R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham – WLR Daily

Posted December 4th, 2007 in juries, law reports, verdicts by sally

R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham [2007] EWCA Crim 2869

“Where the defendant admitted a lesser or different crime from that charged in the indictment it did not necessarily follow that the trial judge was obliged to leave the alternative verdict for a jury’s consideration; sometimes it would be appropriate, but sometimes it would not.”

WLR Daily, 3rd December 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. 

R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham – WLR Daily

Posted December 3rd, 2007 in juries, law reports, verdicts by sally

 R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham [2007] EWCA Crim 2869

Where the defendant admitted a lesser or different crime from that charged in the indictment it did not necessarily follow that the trial judge was obliged to leave the alternative verdict for a jury’s consideration; sometimes it would be appropriate, but sometimes it would not.”

WLR Daily, 3rd December 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note: once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.