Category: news

‘Clive Moys recently featured in the June edition of LexisNexis Corporate Rescue and Insolvency for his article, “Another piece in the jigsaw: non-domestic rate liability for unoccupied commercial property despite a CVA.” In this article, Clive examines the Divisional Court’s recent decision in the Robinson Webster (Holdings) Limited (RWHL) appeal and its implications for tenants, landlords and billing authorities.’

Full Story

Radcliffe Chambers, 15th July 2026

Source: radcliffechambers.com

‘Matthew Mills has recently published an article in Private Client Business on the jurisdiction to make administrative schemes for charities. The article draws together the key English authorities, including the recent Dasji v Bhudia [2026] EWHC 455 (Ch), and the key Australian decisions. It explains the test for making an administrative scheme, the evidence which the court and the Charity Commission will want to see, the terms which may be included in an administrative scheme, and the future of administrative schemes generally.’

Full Story

Radcliffe Chambers, 21st July 2026

Source: radcliffechambers.com

‘The case concerns a partnership founded during the COVID-19 pandemic to sell lateral flow tests (“LFTs”). Following the dissolution of the partnership, both partners continued selling COVID-19 LFTs through different entities, making substantial sums of money.’

Full Story

Radcliffe Chambers, 28th July 2026

Source: radcliffechambers.com

‘The legal and economic foundations of “class action”-style competition claims are being tested with increased vigour in the UK. The evidence for this view lies in how the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) and appeal courts have scrutinised whether claims, settlements and funding arrangements are proportionate, workable and aligned with class members’ interests in a raft of recent competition collective proceedings. That trend is now unfolding alongside a new UK government consultation on making opt-out collective actions, regulatory appeals and competition enforcement “swifter and simpler”.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 29th July 2026

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

‘An Employment Tribunal has recently given its reasons for concluding why pride displays in a workplace were not discriminatory against a claimant’s religious belief or disability. Robin White and Rachel Wall examine the ruling.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘Paul Henty examines how the first significant application of the rewritten procurement protocol in the 2026 TCC Guide changes what contracting authorities should expect when faced with a procurement challenge.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘In London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Garrett [2026] EAT 77, the employer (“Respondent”) appealed against a decision of the Employment Tribunal (“ET”) which had, by majority, found that the Respondent had directly discriminated against the employee (“Claimant”) on the grounds of belief. The ET also upheld one complaint of direct race discrimination.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘This piece focuses on the central principles of the proposed reforms to financial remedies law: a starting point of sharing matrimonial property, with the possibility of a departure from an equal division where this is required to meet needs. There are two reasons for this narrow focus. The first is a lack of space to consider every potential issue with the proposed scheme. The second is more pragmatic. Law reform in this area is important. This is particularly true in relation to the law relating to cohabitants, where the current lack of protection is highly problematic, and to the law relating to pre-nuptial agreements where, as Sharon Thompson has convincingly argued, there is a real need for legislative safeguards.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 28th July 2026

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

‘FAZ v MAZ [2026] EWFC 131. This judgment of Poole J concerned allegations of sexual abuse in private law children proceedings. At the outset Poole J observed, expectedly, that where the court has to determine allegations of sexual abuse of a child by a parent “the stakes are high”.’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 13th July 2026

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com

‘A client asked me a simple question at court recently: “If the court makes a money order, does that mean they get a CCJ?”

The instinctive answer is “yes”. A County Court money judgment is, in ordinary language, a CCJ. But in possession proceedings the answer is more complicated, and rather odd.’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 15th July 2026

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com

‘Two complainants, similar stories, one registered professional: should fitness to practise committees consider the accounts together to rebut coincidence? High Court guidance in Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v The General Medical Council and Dr Neill Charles Garrard [2025] EWHC 318 (Admin) (‘Garrard’) clarifies when and how fitness to practise panels may cross‑admit evidence to assess the improbability of coincidence. This post explains the coincidence approach to cross‑admissibility and highlights the importance of being live to the issue throughout the life of a case.’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 27th July 2026

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com

‘The former captain of a prestigious London yacht club, who led a campaign against the club’s commodore over mooring fees for his 80-foot Dutch barge, has been cleared of harassment allegations at London’s High Court.’

Full Story

The Independent, 29th July 2026

Source: www.independent.co.uk

‘A fan of TV serial killer Dexter has been found guilty of murdering two homeless men whose bodies were dismembered and hidden in woodland before he killed his cellmate while awaiting trial.’

Full Story

The Independent, 28th July 2026

Source: www.independent.co.uk

‘The campaign group Led By Donkeys has received £27,000 in compensation after a giant banner it displayed in Parliament Square saying “Yes It’s A Genocide” was seized by Greater London Authority officials and destroyed.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 28th July 2026

Source: www.theguardian.com

‘A mother and her new boyfriend have been found guilty of murdering her two-year-old daughter, with the man also convicted of sexually abusing the girl.’

Full Story

BBC News, 28th July 2026

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

‘Parklane Plowden barrister Cait Sweeney and head of the Chancery team, Nicola Phillipson, are joined by Henry Straw, associate solicitor at IDR Law, to explore the legal principles, challenges and considerations when children seek financial provision from a deceased person’s estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.’

Full Story

Park Lane Plowden, 24th July 2026

Source: www.parklaneplowden.co.uk

‘Nicola Newbegin KC and Ben Jones, instructed by Brendan Costello of Gordons Partnership, successfully represented the Defendant in a high-profile judicial review concerning the prescription of gender affirming hormones to under 18s, in which MacDonald J refused the Claimant permission to apply for judicial review.’

Full Story

Old Square Chambers, 1st July 2026

Source: oldsquare.co.uk

‘A new initiative by the Ethics and Integrity Commission (EIC) will examine existing Codes of Ethical Conduct to formulate “practical, non-statutory guidance”.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 28th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘In HB, Re (Appointment of Personal Welfare Deputy) [2026] EWCA Civ 960 (24 July 2026), Sir Stephen Cobb, President of the Family Division and President of the Court of Protection concluded that the judge was wrong to refuse the application, finding that the appointment of a deputy would in practice enhance rather than diminish the effectiveness of decision-making for the appellants’ son, HB.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 27th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘The issue arose from uncertainty as to whether amendments made in 1992 had effectively equalised Normal Retirement Ages at 65. The compromise reflected a 66:34 assessment of the competing arguments and provides for an NRA of 60 for service from 17 May 1990 to 12 May 1992, 61.7 for service from 13 May 1992 to 5 April 1999, and 65 thereafter. Adam Johnson J approved the settlement as striking a fair balance between the competing positions and providing certainty as to the future administration of the Plan. The judgment contains a useful, although largely orthodox, application of the principles governing court approval of compromises in pensions proceedings.‘

Full Story

Pensions Barrister, 27th July 2026

Source: www.pensionsbarrister.com