BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted May 8th, 2025 in law reports by michael

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Johnston v Financial Ombudsman Service [2025] EWCA Civ 551 (08 May 2025)

Betta Oceanway Company v SC Tomini Trading SRL [2025] EWCA Civ 595 (08 May 2025)

Z (A Child), Re [2025] EWCA Civ 594 (07 May 2025)

Nazir & Anor v Begum [2025] EWCA Civ 587 (07 May 2025)

The Czech Republic v Diag Human SE & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 588 (07 May 2025)

Fasano v Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 592 (07 May 2025)

Bratt v Jones [2025] EWCA Civ 562 (02 May 2025)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

King & Anor, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 596 (08 May 2025)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Possible (The 10:10 Foundation), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Transport [2025] EWHC 1101 (Admin) (08 May 2025)

Social Work England v Brown [2025] EWHC 1087 (Admin) (06 May 2025)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Carl v Hawkins & Ors [2025] EWHC 1104 (Ch) (07 May 2025)

Sanrose Investment Ltd v Foley & Ors [2025] EWHC 1071 (Ch) (07 May 2025)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Alta Trading UK Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Ors [2025] EWHC 1097 (Comm) (08 May 2025)

A Corporation v Firm B & Anor [2025] EWHC 1092 (Comm) (08 May 2025)

Malhotra Leisure Ltd v Aviva Insurance Ltd [2025] EWHC 1090 (Comm) (07 May 2025)

High Court (Family Division)

AB v CD (Rev1) [2025] EWHC 985 (Fam) (01 May 2025)

Source: www.bailii.org

EAT clarifies principles of territorial and international jurisdiction in CNN v Bhatti – Old Square Chambers

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘The EAT has dismissed CNN’s appeal against a decision of the Employment Tribunal which held that it had both territorial and international jurisdiction to hear the claims of British presenter and international correspondent, Saima Mohsin, injured on assignment and later fired.’

Full Story

Old Square Chambers, 7th May 2025

Source: oldsquare.co.uk

Racially Determined Case Characteristics: Exploring Disparities in the Use of Sentencing Factors in England and Wales – British Journal of Criminology

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘There is little understanding of how documented ethnic disparities in sentencing outcomes in England and Wales come to be and, consequently, how to address them. We argue that disparities in sentence outcomes could stem from how cases are constructed. We hypothesize that case characteristics determined through a high degree of judicial discretion and an assessment of the offender have a high risk of being racially determined, and therefore, operate as precursors of ethnic disparities in sentencing. We test this using Crown Court Sentencing Survey and Court Proceedings data. We identify three sentencing factors (remorse, good character and ability to rehabilitate) clearly favouring White offenders. We contextualize their operation and argue that all three should be classified as racially determined and sources of ethnic disparity. We conclude by setting out targeted policy solutions.’

Full Story

British Journal of Criminology, March 2025

Source: academic.oup.com

Gonorrhoea and Presumed Sexual Abuse – Court of Appeal Clarifies Re A, B and C – Parklane Plowden

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘The matter concerned F, a six-year-old girl, (referred to in the first instance decision as ‘C’ and in the appeal as ‘F’) who presented at A&E in mid-2023 and was tested positive for gonorrhoea. At this time, F lives with her maternal grandmother and maternal uncle, X (referred to in the first instance decision as ‘P’ and in the appeal as ‘X’). X had also tested positive for gonorrhoea prior to F’s diagnosis, F’s mother, M, also tested positive.’

Full Story

Parklane Plowden, 7th May 2025

Source: www.parklaneplowden.co.uk

The Limits of Positive Action under the Equality Act 2010 – UK Labour Law

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘Some British media outlets ran stories in April 2025 on how a regional Police Force (West Yorkshire) has put ‘applications from white Brits on hold’ and how the Chief Constable wants to discriminate against white candidates (Foreman, 2025; Bolton & Martin, 2025; Siddell, 2025). However, as may be inferred from the inconsistent tense, only a very limited version of positive discrimination is permitted under British law – and the facts of the story are not what may be, perhaps intentionally, implied from the phrasing used.’

Full Story

UK Labour Law, 8th May 2025

Source: uklabourlawblog.com

Hotel manager sacked for ‘having sex with colleague after loud partying’ wins claim for unfair dismissal – The Independent

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘A hotel manager who was fired for playing loud music and allegedly having sex with a colleague in one of the rooms has won an unfair dismissal claim.’

Full Story

The Independent, 7th May 2025

Source: www.independent.co.uk

The deprivation of children’s liberty: the Human Rights Act exists for a reason – Administrative Court Blog

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘It is a rare event where, in an appeal against a first instance judgment, all parties unequivocally say that the judgment was wrong. So it was in J v Bath and North East Somerset Council [2025] EWCA Civ 478, which concerned a profoundly disabled 14 year-old (‘J’) in respect of whom the respondent local authority had been granted a full care order under section 31 of the Children Act 1989. Everyone agreed that J’s liberty needed to be restricted to a certain extent to properly look after him. The question was whether this meant that the elements of a ‘deprivation of liberty’ under Article 5 ECHR (the right to liberty) were satisfied as respects J’s care arrangements, so that a court had to make a deprivation of liberty (‘DoL’) order to render those care arrangements a lawful deprivation of liberty. In the High Court, Lieven J had held that the elements were not satisfied, and so no DoL order was necessary because there was no deprivation of liberty under Article 5 ([2024] EWHC 1690 (Fam)). The Court of Appeal (Sir Andrew McFarlane PFD, King and Singh LJJ) came to the opposite conclusion: J’s care arrangements amounted to a deprivation of liberty, and so a DoL Order was necessary to render those arrangements lawful under Article 5 and section 6 HRA 1998. The Court drew particular assistance from the submissions of the Secretary of State for Education, who intervened in the appeal. The Education Secretary was represented by Joanne Clement KC, who led this Blog’s very own Samuel Willis.’

Full Story

Administrative Court Blog, 7th May 2025

Source: administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com

Report urges Bar Standards Board to tackle systemic obstacles to tech uptake – Local Government Lawyer

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘The inconsistent use of technology at the Bar is driven by structural factors such as limited funding, time constraints, and the self-employed nature of the profession, a report for the Bar Standards Board has found.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 7th May 2025

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

NHS blood donation worker wins £30k compensation after ‘insulting’ comparison to Darth Vader – The Independent

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘A woman has won almost £30,000 in an employment tribunal after she was compared to Darth Vader by her co-worker.’

Full Story

The Independent, 7th May 2025

Source: www.independent.co.uk

You say potato… – Pensions Barrister

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘James McCreath looks at the different approaches adopted by the Court of Appeal to the construction of pension scheme documents and pensions legislation, and considers whether those differences are justified.’

Full Story

Pensions Barrister, 8th May 2025

Source: www.pensionsbarrister.com

The UK Supreme Court Judgment Has Brought Much Needed Confusion: Why For Women Scotland Did Not Change UK Discrimination Law – UK Labour Law

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘What did the Supreme Court decide in For Women Scotland? The case concerned quotas in the representation of women in public boards in Scotland, under the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018. It was brought on appeal by For Women Scotland Ltd, a feminist organisation campaigning for women’s and children’s rights. The question, for the Court, was whether the Scottish quotas should include trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC), as provided for by the Gender Recognition Act 2004. To answer this question the Court turned to the interpretation of the Equality Act 2010, which is a consolidating act on matters of equality and non-discrimination. The Court found for the appellants, ruling that the quotas in the Scottish Act do not include trans women with a GRC.’

Full Story

UK Labour Law Blog, 7th May 2025

Source: uklabourlawblog.com

Ministers call on tech firms for ‘bold ideas’ to tackle justice system crisis – The Independent

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘Top technology firms are set to meet with the Justice Secretary for the first time to look at how artificial intelligence and technology could be used to tackle violence in prisons and cut re-offending.’

Full Story

The Independent, 7th May 2025

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Judge condemns “continued saga” of excessive family law costs – Legal Futures

Posted May 8th, 2025 in news by sally

‘A deputy district judge and leading family law solicitor has condemned what he called the “continued saga” of “excessive costs” charged by family lawyers.’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 8th May 2025

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk