Second application for security for costs “not an abuse of process” – Litigation Futures

Posted December 14th, 2016 in abuse of process, consent orders, costs, news by sally

‘A businessman involved in a £132m dispute with property tycoons Nick and Christian Candy has been ordered to provide £5.5m security for costs after the High Court rejected arguments that the application was an abuse of process because the Candys had withdrawn a previous application.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 13th December 2016