Counter-restitution not required
Court of Appeal
“It was not necessarily the case that a party wishing to obtain rescission of a contract on the ground of duress had to be able to provide counter-restitution. The Court of Appeal so stated, inter alia, when: (i) allowing an appeal by the defendants, Nochum Halpern, David Halpern, Bezalel Halpern, Akiva Halpern and Eshter Vaisfische, against a decision of Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in the commercial court ( 2 All ER (Comm) 251) and (ii) allowing their appeal against a decision of Mr Nigel Teare, QC, sitting as a deputy Queen’s Bench Division judge ( The Times July 18, 2006;  3 WLR 946) on a preliminary issue whether rescission was available as a remedy for duress if substantial restitution could not be given.”
The Times, 14th May 2007
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.