Halpern and Another v Halpern and Others (No. 2) – Times Law Reports

Posted May 14th, 2007 in contracts, duress, law reports by sally

Counter-restitution not required

Halpern and Another v. Halpern and Others (No. 2) 

Court of Appeal

“It was not necessarily the case that a party wishing to obtain rescission of a contract on the ground of duress had to be able to provide counter-restitution. The Court of Appeal so stated, inter alia, when: (i) allowing an appeal by the defendants, Nochum Halpern, David Halpern, Bezalel Halpern, Akiva Halpern and Eshter Vaisfische, against a decision of Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in the commercial court ([2006] 2 All ER (Comm) 251) and (ii) allowing their appeal against a decision of Mr Nigel Teare, QC, sitting as a deputy Queen’s Bench Division judge ( The Times July 18, 2006; [2006] 3 WLR 946) on a preliminary issue whether rescission was available as a remedy for duress if substantial restitution could not be given.”

The Times, 14th May 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.