‘The Administrative Court’s decision in R (CGT) v West Sussex County Council is an important restatement of principle in community care law. It decisively rejects attempts by local authorities to invoke ‘double recovery’ as a basis for refusing Care Act funding where a disabled person has received personal injury compensation which is held in trust for them. It also closes the door on the revival of ‘Peters undertakings’ by indirect means, and confirms that local authorities should not seek to involve the Court of Protection in disputes with deputies about care funding eligibility in these cases.’
Law Society's Gazette, 13th March 2026
Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk
