‘Dr Charlotte Proudman applied for £353,017, arguing that she should be awarded costs on an indemnity basis as the charges against her were “so doomed to fail that they should never have been proceeded with”. She claimed her prosecution was “the equivalent of a malicious prosecution” and that she was “improperly pursued and harassed” by the Bar Standards Board “in a way that a man would not have been” had he been the author of the tweets that gave rise to her prosecution.’
Law Society Gazette, 18th September 2025
Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk
