Day: 28 April 2025

‘In this case, the Registrant had examined two female patients who were unknown to each other at different A & E Departments nine months apart. Both patients complained of a degree of mental disorder. Each described the Registrant chanting in a “hypnotic” fashion or speaking in a “soothing” voice with a “weird” tone. Patient A’s evidence was that the Registrant had said that when she woke up she would “lust for me” and “love me and kiss me.” He asked her to remove her top before touching her breast and squeezing her nipple. Patient B’s evidence was that the Registrant had said that her boyfriend was the source of her problems and that she should wait at a bus stop for him so he could pick her up to take her home. He also repeatedly asked her to remove her clothes including her vest and sports bra.’

Full Story

2 Hare Court, 15th April 2025

Source: www.2harecourt.com

‘As readers may be aware, on 16 April 2025 the UK Supreme Court in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16, ruled that the legal definition of “woman” under the Equality Act 2010 is based on biological sex assigned at birth. This judgment, arising from a dispute over gender balance quotas on public sector boards, determined that “sex” within the Act is a binary concept rooted in biology, and that a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) does not alter this biological sex for the purposes of sex-based legal protections. This decision, while not directly legislating for the sporting world, may carry weight for how sporting bodies in the UK may interpret their own regulations concerning single-sex competition, particularly when considering the core tenets of inclusion and the maintenance of a level and competitive playing field – both central to sporting integrity.’

Full Story

4-5 Gray's Inn Square, 24th April 2025

Source: www.4-5.co.uk

‘Collective actions in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) have been beset by challenges to funding agreements on the grounds that: (i) it is impermissible for funders (and lawyers) to be paid from aggregate damages before distribution to the class; and (ii) by agreeing to funding agreements (“LFAs”) that provide for payment to funders before the class, the Proposed Class Representative is not acting in the interests of the class.’

Full Story

4 New Square, 17th April 2025

Source: www.4newsquare.com

‘Last week, the UK Supreme Court held that the terms “man,” “woman,” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 (EA) refer only to birth-assigned sex (‘biological’ sex) and not acquired or certificated sex on a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). It rejected the Scottish Ministers’ position that trans women with GRCs should be recognised as women under the EA. While the ruling has been criticised on multiple fronts, it raises particularly pressing questions about the adequacy of anti-discrimination protections for trans persons and the continued relevance of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA).’

Full Story

Oxford Human Rights Hub, 25th April 2025

Source: ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk

‘This was an appeal of a possession order made by HHJ Luba KC. Ms Thiam was the assured tenant of Richmond Housing. A possession order had been sought on grounds 8 (rent arrears), ground 14 (anti social behaviour by the tenant’s son), ground 12 (breach of tenancy in failure to allow access for inspection and repairs), and ground 13 – the condition of the premises had deteriorate by acts of waste, neglect and default.’

Full Story

Nearly Legal, 27th April 2025

Source: nearlylegal.co.uk

‘Shabana Mahmood risks putting more pregnant women behind bars through her bill to prevent new guidelines which highlighted the need for pre-sentencing reports based on “different personal characteristics” including age, sex and ethnicity, charities have warned.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 27th April 2025

Source: www.theguardian.com

‘A man has been jailed for a minimum of 27 years for the murder​ of his estranged wife.’

Full Story

BBC News, 25th April 2025

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

‘Surrogacy arrangements are more popular than ever. The legal framework surrounding the making of parental orders in surrogacy cases in the UK is well-established. It is governed by section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, whose criteria are considered by the court together with the overall lifelong welfare of the child. Where those criteria are satisfied, the intended parents of a child born to surrogacy can obtain a parental order and become the child’s only legal parents.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 25th April 2025

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk