A Stitch in Time Saves Nine – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted May 16th, 2017 in amendments, civil justice, civil procedure rules, news, time limits by sally

‘In the well-known case of Cobbold v London Borough of Greenwich (LTL 24/5/2001) Gibson LJ said:

‘The overriding objective (of the CPR) is that the court should deal with cases justly. That includes, so far as is practicable, ensuring that each case is dealt with not only expeditiously but also fairly. Amendments in general ought to be allowed so that the real dispute between the parties can be adjudicated upon provided that any prejudice to the other party or parties caused by the amendment can be compensated in costs, and the public interest in the efficient administration of justice is not significantly harmed…’.’

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 11th April 2017

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk