Q v Q; In re B (A Child); In re C (A Child) – WLR Daily

Posted August 12th, 2014 in appeals, children, law reports, legal aid by sally

Q v Q; In re B (A Child); In re C (A Child) [2014] EWFC 31; [2014] WLR (D) 372

‘Since public funding was not in general available for private law children cases, in some circumstances the court could properly direct that the cost of certain activities should be borne by Her Majesty’s Courts & Tribunals Service (“HMCTS” ), although it was to be emphasised that, the provision of interpreters and translators apart, that was an order of last resort. No such order should be made except by, or having first consulted, a High Court judge or a designated family judge.’

WLR Daily, 6th August 2014

Source: www.iclr.co.uk