Noble v Owens – WLR Daily

Posted March 12th, 2010 in appeals, evidence, fraud, judgments, law reports, setting aside by sally

Noble v Owens [2010] EWCA Civ 224; [2010] WLR (D) 73

 “Where fresh evidence was adduced in the Court of Appeal tending to show that the judge at first instance had been deliberately misled the court would only allow the appeal and order a retrial where the fraud was either admitted or the evidence of it was incontrovertible. In any other case, the issue of fraud had to be determined before the judgment of the court below could be set aside.”

WLR Daily, 11th March 2010


Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.