Regina v Billingham (Mark) Regina v Billingham (Justin) – Times Law Reports

Posted March 25th, 2009 in evidence, jury directions, law reports by sally

Regina v Billingham (Mark) Regina v Billingham (Justin)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“While the present Judicial Studies Board direction in respect of previous inconsistent statements required the jury to be sure that a previous statement exculpatory of a defendant was true, it was sufficient for the jury to conclude that it might be true.”

The Times, 25th March 2009


Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.