Regina v Dobson [2011] WLR (D) 221
“The principle that, even where there was a logical inconsistency in the verdicts of a jury, a conviction might be safe if the court found that there was an explanation for the inconsistency was subject to the limitation that the explanation had to fall within the parameters of the case as summed up by the trial judge.”
WLR Daily, 6th July 2011
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
