Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd and another – WLR Daily

Posted December 19th, 2008 in judgments, law reports, reasons by sally

“The universal obligation of judicial tribunals to give reasons which were candid, intelligible, transparent and coherent were qualities which litigants and the public were entitled to expect in all reasoned judgments. Transparency meant that properly drawn reasons should make it possible for the reader to find sources especially, but not only, sources of law, which were referred to but not recited in the judgment.”

Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd and another [2008] EWCA Civ 1446; [2008] WLR (D) 396

WLR Daily, 18th December 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.