R (L) v Merton London Borough Council – WLR Daily

Posted June 16th, 2008 in children, disabled persons, law reports, residential care by sally

R (L) v Merton London Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 191

“The Arrangements for Placement of Children (General) Regulations 1991 (SI 1991/890), reg 13 did not impose a maximum of 120 days of respite care in a 12-month period, although Department of Health guidance (‘Respite care: series of short-term placements of children’ (LAC (95) 14) ) appeared to indicate otherwise.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.