<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;I think I&#8217;ve killed Colin &#8211; he was getting on my nerves&#8217;: Gran who smothered terminally ill former partner escapes jail term &#8211; The Indpendent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/i-think-ive-killed-colin-he-was-getting-on-my-nerves-gran-who-smothered-terminally-ill-former-partner-escapes-jail-term-the-indpendent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/i-think-ive-killed-colin-he-was-getting-on-my-nerves-gran-who-smothered-terminally-ill-former-partner-escapes-jail-term-the-indpendent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[carers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspended sentences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A grandmother has been given a suspended sentence for killing her terminally ill former partner. Full story The Independent, 17th May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A grandmother has been given a suspended sentence for killing her terminally ill former partner.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/i-think-ive-killed-colin--he-was-getting-on-my-nerves-gran-who-smothered-terminally-ill-former-partner-escapes-jail-term-8620975.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/i-think-ive-killed-colin-he-was-getting-on-my-nerves-gran-who-smothered-terminally-ill-former-partner-escapes-jail-term-the-indpendent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Litvinenko inquest close to collapse after coroner rules crucial evidence secret &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/litvinenko-inquest-close-to-collapse-after-coroner-rules-crucial-evidence-secret-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/litvinenko-inquest-close-to-collapse-after-coroner-rules-crucial-evidence-secret-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The inquest into the death of Alexander Litvinenko is close to collapse after a coroner partially upheld an application by William Hague to keep crucial evidence secret.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 17th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The inquest into the death of Alexander Litvinenko is close to collapse after a coroner partially upheld an application by William Hague to keep crucial evidence secret.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/17/litvinenko-coroner-crucial-evidence-secret">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/litvinenko-inquest-close-to-collapse-after-coroner-rules-crucial-evidence-secret-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solicitor General welcomes guidance on sentencing complex frauds &#8211; Attorney General&#8217;s Office</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/solicitor-general-welcomes-guidance-on-sentencing-complex-frauds-attorney-generals-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/solicitor-general-welcomes-guidance-on-sentencing-complex-frauds-attorney-generals-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Court of Appeal issues a judgment on sentences for the most serious commercial frauds and increases the sentences of two men.&#8221; Full story Attorney General&#8217;s Office, 16th May 2013 Source: www.gov.uk/ago]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Court of Appeal issues a judgment on sentences for the most serious commercial frauds and increases the sentences of two men.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/solicitor-general-welcomes-guidance-on-sentencing-complex-frauds">Full story</a></p>
<p>Attorney General&#8217;s Office, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/ago">www.gov.uk/ago</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/solicitor-general-welcomes-guidance-on-sentencing-complex-frauds-attorney-generals-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traffic courts in every area &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/traffic-courts-in-every-area-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/traffic-courts-in-every-area-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road traffic offences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Local areas are being urged to work with the judiciary to set up the courts as part of proposals to reduce delays and focus more on serious and contested cases. This forms part of the Government’s vision for a more efficient and effective criminal justice system that meet the needs of victims, witnesses and communities.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Local areas are being urged to work with the judiciary to set up the courts as part of proposals to reduce delays and focus more on serious and contested cases. This forms part of the Government’s vision for a more efficient and effective criminal justice system that meet the needs of victims, witnesses and communities.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/traffic-courts-in-every-area">Full story</a> </p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice">www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/traffic-courts-in-every-area-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your views wanted for EU review on civil and family justice &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/your-views-wanted-for-eu-review-on-civil-and-family-justice-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/your-views-wanted-for-eu-review-on-civil-and-family-justice-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Lawyers, business groups and the public are all being asked to submit their views on the balance of competences between the UK and the European Union on civil judicial cooperation (including family matters).&#8221; Full story Ministry of Justice, 16th May 2013 Source: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lawyers, business groups and the public are all being asked to submit their views on the balance of competences between the UK and the European Union on civil judicial cooperation (including family matters).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/your-views-wanted-for-eu-review-on-civil-and-family-justice">Full story</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice">www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/your-views-wanted-for-eu-review-on-civil-and-family-justice-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preston (formerly Moore) v President of the Methodist Conference &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/preston-formerly-moore-v-president-of-the-methodist-conference-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/preston-formerly-moore-v-president-of-the-methodist-conference-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair dismissal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preston (formerly Moore) v President of the Methodist Conference [2013 UKSC 29; [2013] WLR (D) 179 &#8220;The basis for the rights and duties of an ordained minister of the Methodist Church were to be found in the constitutional provisions of the church and not in any arrangement of a kind which could amount to a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-179">Preston (formerly Moore) v President of the Methodist Conference [2013 UKSC 29; [2013] WLR (D) 179</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The basis for the rights and duties of an ordained minister of the Methodist Church were to be found in the constitutional provisions of the church and not in any arrangement of a kind which could amount to a contract. Therefore a Methodist minister was not an “employee” of the church for the purposes of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and was not entitled to bring proceedings for unfair dismissal against the church.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/preston-formerly-moore-v-president-of-the-methodist-conference-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crime and Courts Act 2013: Consultation on the application of the equal merit provision &#8211; Judicial Appointments Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/crime-and-courts-act-2013-consultation-on-the-application-of-the-equal-merit-provision-judicial-appointments-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/crime-and-courts-act-2013-consultation-on-the-application-of-the-equal-merit-provision-judicial-appointments-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial appointments commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is interested in views on potential approaches to the application of the provisions in Part 2 of Schedule 13 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (CCA) relating to diversity considerations where candidates for judicial office are of equal merit. The provisions in the CCA clarify that the JAC’s duty [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is interested in views on potential approaches to the application of the provisions in Part 2 of Schedule 13 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (CCA) relating to diversity considerations where candidates for judicial office are of equal merit. The provisions in the CCA clarify that the JAC’s duty to make selections ‘solely on merit’ (S63(2) Constitutional Reform Act 2005) does not prevent it from selecting one candidate over another for the purpose of increasing judicial diversity where there are two candidates of equal merit.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/equal-merit-provision/consult_view">Full story</a></p>
<p>Judicial Appointments Commission, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk">www.justice.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/crime-and-courts-act-2013-consultation-on-the-application-of-the-equal-merit-provision-judicial-appointments-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special traffic courts to deal with motoring cases under ministers&#8217; plans &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/special-traffic-courts-to-deal-with-motoring-cases-under-ministers-plans-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/special-traffic-courts-to-deal-with-motoring-cases-under-ministers-plans-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road traffic offences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Traffic-light jumpers and speeding motorists are to be dealt with in special traffic courts in a bid to free up time for more serious cases, the government has announced.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 17th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Traffic-light jumpers and speeding motorists are to be dealt with in special traffic courts in a bid to free up time for more serious cases, the government has announced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/17/special-traffic-courts-for-motoring-cases">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/special-traffic-courts-to-deal-with-motoring-cases-under-ministers-plans-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the new criminal legal aid reforms breach the right to a fair trial? &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/will-the-new-criminal-legal-aid-reforms-breach-the-right-to-a-fair-trial-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/will-the-new-criminal-legal-aid-reforms-breach-the-right-to-a-fair-trial-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;One of the most contentious proposals in the Consultation Paper on the transforming legal aid is the removal of client choice in criminal cases. Under the proposals contracts for the provision of legal aid will be awarded to a limited number of firms in an area. The areas are similar to the existing CPS areas. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One of the most contentious proposals in the Consultation Paper on the transforming legal aid is the removal of client choice in criminal cases. Under the proposals contracts for the provision of legal aid will be awarded to a limited number of firms in an area. The areas are similar to the existing CPS areas. The Green Paper anticipates that there will be four or five such providers in each area. Thus the county of Kent, for example, will have four or five providers in an area currently served by fifty or so legal aid firms. Each area will have a limited number providers that will offer it is argued economies of scale.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/05/16/will-the-new-criminal-legal-aid-reforms-breach-the-right-to-a-fair-trial/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/will-the-new-criminal-legal-aid-reforms-breach-the-right-to-a-fair-trial-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King Arthur Pendragon loses second Stonehenge fight &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/king-arthur-pendragon-loses-second-stonehenge-fight-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/king-arthur-pendragon-loses-second-stonehenge-fight-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[burials and cremation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historic buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A druid who has lost his second legal bid to get human remains reburied at Stonehenge has said he will fight on.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 16th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A druid who has lost his second legal bid to get human remains reburied at Stonehenge has said he will fight on.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-22558293">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/king-arthur-pendragon-loses-second-stonehenge-fight-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conman Kallakis gets four more years in jail &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/conman-kallakis-gets-four-more-years-in-jail-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/conman-kallakis-gets-four-more-years-in-jail-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Achilleas Kallakis, a conman who received a seven-year jail sentence in January, will spend a further four years behind bars after a British government lawyer called on senior judges for a tougher sentence.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Achilleas Kallakis, a conman who received a seven-year jail sentence in January, will spend a further four years behind bars after a British government lawyer called on senior judges for a tougher sentence.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/16/conman-kallakis-four-more-years">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/conman-kallakis-gets-four-more-years-in-jail-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police watchdog criticised for errors in investigation into death in custody &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/police-watchdog-criticised-for-errors-in-investigation-into-death-in-custody-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/police-watchdog-criticised-for-errors-in-investigation-into-death-in-custody-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death in custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restraint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The official police watchdog made a series of errors in an investigation which cleared officers over the death of a man in custody, an independent report has found.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 17th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The official police watchdog made a series of errors in an investigation which cleared officers over the death of a man in custody, an independent report has found.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/may/16/police-watchdog-criticised-death-custody">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/police-watchdog-criticised-for-errors-in-investigation-into-death-in-custody-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay marriage: Review of civil partnerships possible but not until 2019 &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/gay-marriage-review-of-civil-partnerships-possible-but-not-until-2019-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/gay-marriage-review-of-civil-partnerships-possible-but-not-until-2019-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Ministers have said they are prepared to review whether civil partnerships should be extended to heterosexual couples but not until 2019.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 17th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ministers have said they are prepared to review whether civil partnerships should be extended to heterosexual couples but not until 2019.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22564023">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/gay-marriage-review-of-civil-partnerships-possible-but-not-until-2019-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SFO considers criminal inquiry into alleged price fixing by oil firms &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/sfo-considers-criminal-inquiry-into-alleged-price-fixing-by-oil-firms-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/sfo-considers-criminal-inquiry-into-alleged-price-fixing-by-oil-firms-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price fixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serious Fraud Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Serious Fraud Office said on Thursday it is considering a criminal inquiry into alleged price fixing at BP and other oil companies already being investigated by European competition authorities.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Serious Fraud Office said on Thursday it is considering a criminal inquiry into alleged price fixing at BP and other oil companies already being investigated by European competition authorities.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/16/sfo-alleged-price-fixing-oil">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/sfo-considers-criminal-inquiry-into-alleged-price-fixing-by-oil-firms-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Death contracts&#8217; could give terminally ill the right to die &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/death-contracts-could-give-terminally-ill-the-right-to-die-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/death-contracts-could-give-terminally-ill-the-right-to-die-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[assisted suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Terminally ill people could sign a &#8216;death contract&#8217; allowing doctors to help them end their lives under new legal proposals.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 16th May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Terminally ill people could sign a &#8216;death contract&#8217; allowing doctors to help them end their lives under new legal proposals.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/death-contracts-could-give-terminally-ill-the-right-to-die-8619896.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/death-contracts-could-give-terminally-ill-the-right-to-die-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council wrongly classed asylum seeker children as adults &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/council-wrongly-classed-asylum-seeker-children-as-adults-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/council-wrongly-classed-asylum-seeker-children-as-adults-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A London council has had to pay out more than £1m in costs for wrongly assessing asylum seeker children as adults. These wrong decisions have condemned some children to homelessness, prevented them from going to school and led to some being unlawfully held in adult detention centres.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 17th May 2013 Source: [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A London council has had to pay out more than £1m in costs for wrongly assessing asylum seeker children as adults. These wrong decisions have condemned some children to homelessness, prevented them from going to school and led to some being unlawfully held in adult detention centres.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/17/council-asylum-seeker-children-classed-adults">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/council-wrongly-classed-asylum-seeker-children-as-adults-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAILII: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1179/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1179/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v Kallakis &#038; Anor [2013] EWCA Crim 709 (16 May 2013) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Environment Agency v Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd &#038; Anor, R. (On the application of) [2013] EWCA Civ 542 (16 May 2013) D &#038; G Cars Ltd v Essex Police Authority [2013] EWCA [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/709.html">R. v Kallakis &#038; Anor [2013] EWCA Crim 709 (16 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/542.html">Environment Agency v Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd &#038; Anor, R. (On the application of) [2013] EWCA Civ 542 (16 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/514.html">D &#038; G Cars Ltd v Essex Police Authority [2013] EWCA Civ 514 (16 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/544.html">Fish &#038; Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK &#038; Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 544 (16 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/518.html">Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) v O&#8217;Docherty &#038; Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 518 (16 May 2013)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Queen&#8217;s Bench Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2013/1245.html">Thames Chambers Solicitors v Miah (Rev 1) [2013] EWHC 1245 (QB) (16 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2013/1229.html">Cussens v Realreed Ltd [2013] EWHC 1229 (QB) (15 May 2013)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Chancery Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2013/1279.html">Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd &#038; Anor [2013] EWHC 1279 (Ch) (16 May 2013)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Administrative Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2013/1239.html">Soor &#038; Anor v London Borough of Redbridge [2013] EWHC 1239 (Admin) (16 May 2013)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Commercial Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2013/1240.html">Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi Tbk Ltd &#038; Anor [2013] EWHC 1240 (Comm) (16 May 2013)</a>   </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org ">www.bailii.org </a>   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1179/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Statutory Instrument &#8211; legislation.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instrument-legislation-gov-uk-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instrument-legislation-gov-uk-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Energy Supply Company Administration (Scotland) Rules 2013 The Income Tax (Monitoring Schemes Relating to Vulnerable Persons) Order 2013 Source: www.legislation.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1047/made">The Energy Supply Company Administration (Scotland) Rules 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1133/made">The Income Tax (Monitoring Schemes Relating to Vulnerable Persons) Order 2013</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk">www.legislation.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instrument-legislation-gov-uk-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coeliac sufferer made &#8216;violently sick&#8217; at Jamie Oliver restaurant &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/coeliac-sufferer-made-violently-sick-at-jamie-oliver-restaurant-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/coeliac-sufferer-made-violently-sick-at-jamie-oliver-restaurant-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver&#8217;s Italian restaurant chain was fined £8,000 after a woman who told staff three times she was allergic to gluten was served wheat pasta.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 16th May 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver&#8217;s Italian restaurant chain was fined £8,000 after a woman who told staff three times she was allergic to gluten was served wheat pasta.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10061165/Coeliac-sufferer-made-violently-sick-at-Jamie-Oliver-restaurant.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/coeliac-sufferer-made-violently-sick-at-jamie-oliver-restaurant-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man jailed for abuse of &#8216;enslaved&#8217; woman in London &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/man-jailed-for-abuse-of-enslaved-woman-in-london-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/man-jailed-for-abuse-of-enslaved-woman-in-london-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trafficking in human beings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A man has been jailed for 11 years for raping an Indian woman who was treated like a &#8216;slave&#8217; at his home.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 16th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A man has been jailed for 11 years for raping an Indian woman who was treated like a &#8216;slave&#8217; at his home.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-22552912">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/man-jailed-for-abuse-of-enslaved-woman-in-london-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICO updates guidance on dealing with vexatious FOI requests following Tribunal criticism &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ico-updates-guidance-on-dealing-with-vexatious-foi-requests-following-tribunal-criticism-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ico-updates-guidance-on-dealing-with-vexatious-foi-requests-following-tribunal-criticism-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Public bodies should consider whether freedom of information (FOI) requests are &#8216;likely to cause a disproportionate or unjustified level of disruption, irritation or distress&#8217; when determining whether those requests are vexatious or not, the Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office (ICO) has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 16th May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Public bodies should consider whether freedom of information (FOI) requests are &#8216;likely to cause a disproportionate or unjustified level of disruption, irritation or distress&#8217; when determining whether those requests are vexatious or not, the Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office (ICO) has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/ico-updates-guidance-on-dealing-with-vexatious-foi-requests-following-tribunal-criticism/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ico-updates-guidance-on-dealing-with-vexatious-foi-requests-following-tribunal-criticism-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT expert jailed for attacks on Oxford and Cambridge websites &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/it-expert-jailed-for-attacks-on-oxford-and-cambridge-websites-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/it-expert-jailed-for-attacks-on-oxford-and-cambridge-websites-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A man who used his IT expertise to launch cyber-attacks on the websites of Oxford and Cambridge universities has been jailed for two years.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A man who used his IT expertise to launch cyber-attacks on the websites of Oxford and Cambridge universities has been jailed for two years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/16/jailed-attacks-oxford-cambridge-websites">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/it-expert-jailed-for-attacks-on-oxford-and-cambridge-websites-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lulzsec hacker group handed jail sentences &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lulzsec-hacker-group-handed-jail-sentences-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lulzsec-hacker-group-handed-jail-sentences-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;British hackers who were behind a series of high profile cyber-attacks in 2011 have been sentenced.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 16th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;British hackers who were behind a series of high profile cyber-attacks in 2011 have been sentenced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22552753">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lulzsec-hacker-group-handed-jail-sentences-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EVENT: IALS &#8211; The European Public Prosecutor: Coming Soon To A Country Near You?</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/event-ials-the-european-public-prosecutor-coming-soon-to-a-country-near-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/event-ials-the-european-public-prosecutor-coming-soon-to-a-country-near-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forthcoming events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The European Union Act 2011 requires a referendum in the UK before we can appoint an EPP here; but other member states may do so without our participation. Why would they want to, and how would we work with such an official if he were to be appointed?&#8221; Date: 20 May 2013, 2.00-6:00pm Location: Institute [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The European Union Act 2011 requires a referendum in the UK before we can appoint an EPP here; but other member states may do so without our participation. Why would they want to, and how would we work with such an official if he were to be appointed?&#8221;</p>
<p>Date: 20 May 2013, 2.00-6:00pm</p>
<p>Location: Institute of Advanced Legal Studies</p>
<p>Charge: Free event</p>
<p>More information is available <a href="http://events.sas.ac.uk/events/view/13569">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/event-ials-the-european-public-prosecutor-coming-soon-to-a-country-near-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (F) v Director of Public Prosecutions &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-f-v-director-of-public-prosecutions-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-f-v-director-of-public-prosecutions-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown Prosecution Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (F) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] EWHC 945 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 178 &#8220;For the purposes of an offence of rape contrary to the Sexual Offences Act 2003, choice was crucial to the issue of &#8216;consent&#8217; to sexual intercourse. Evidence relating to &#8216;choice&#8217; and the &#8216;freedom&#8217; to make any particular choice had to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-178">Regina (F) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] EWHC 945 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 178</a></p>
<p>&#8220;For the purposes of an offence of rape contrary to the Sexual Offences Act 2003, choice was crucial to the issue of &#8216;consent&#8217; to sexual intercourse. Evidence relating to &#8216;choice&#8217; and the &#8216;freedom&#8217; to make any particular choice had to be approached in a broad common sense way. Where a man deliberately ignored the basis of his partner’s consent to penetration as a manifestation of his control over her consent to penetration could be vitiated and give rise to a conviction for rape.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 24th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-f-v-director-of-public-prosecutions-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (A) v Lowestoft Magistrates’ Court &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-a-v-lowestoft-magistrates-court-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-a-v-lowestoft-magistrates-court-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting restrictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (A) v Lowestoft Magistrates’ Court [2013] EWHC 659 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 177 &#8220;The child specifically referred to in any charge under section 2(1) of the Licensing Act 1902 was a subject of criminal proceedings which were taken &#8216;in respect of&#8217;, and thus “concerned”, that child for the purposes of the court’s power to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-177">Regina (A) v Lowestoft Magistrates’ Court [2013] EWHC 659 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 177</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The child specifically referred to in any charge under section 2(1) of the Licensing Act 1902 was a subject of criminal proceedings which were taken &#8216;in respect of&#8217;, and thus “concerned”, that child for the purposes of the court’s power to impose reporting restrictions under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 26th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-a-v-lowestoft-magistrates-court-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC ( by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) and another v City of York Council &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/pc-by-her-litigation-friend-the-official-solicitor-and-another-v-city-of-york-council-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/pc-by-her-litigation-friend-the-official-solicitor-and-another-v-city-of-york-council-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning difficulties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) and another v City of York Council [2013] EWCA Civ 478; [2013] WLR (D) 176 &#8220;The test for whether a person had capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to decide was specific to the decision in question in its particular factual matrix and context.&#8221; WLR Daily, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-176">PC (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) and another v City of York Council [2013] EWCA Civ 478; [2013] WLR (D) 176</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The test for whether a person had capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to decide was specific to the decision in question in its particular factual matrix and context.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 1st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/pc-by-her-litigation-friend-the-official-solicitor-and-another-v-city-of-york-council-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina v Johal &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-v-johal-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-v-johal-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina v Johal [2013] EWCA Crim 647; [2013] WLR (D) 175 &#8220;When a court postponed confiscation proceedings the omission of a &#8216;specified period&#8217; of postponement was plainly a procedural rather than a substantive error so that a court would not be deprived of its duty to make a confiscation order where such a breach did [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-175">Regina v Johal [2013] EWCA Crim 647; [2013] WLR (D) 175</a></p>
<p>&#8220;When a court postponed confiscation proceedings the omission of a &#8216;specified period&#8217; of postponement was plainly a procedural rather than a substantive error so that a court would not be deprived of its duty to make a confiscation order where such a breach did not prejudice the defendant in any way. Alternatively, if such a failure was indeed procedural it would fall within the ambit of section 14(11) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 which stipulated that such a failure should not be the basis for quashing an otherwise valid confiscation order.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 19th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-v-johal-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (William Hill Organization Ltd) v Horserace Betting Levy Board and others &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-william-hill-organization-ltd-v-horserace-betting-levy-board-and-others-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-william-hill-organization-ltd-v-horserace-betting-levy-board-and-others-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horse racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (William Hill Organization Ltd) v Horserace Betting Levy Board and others [2013] EWCA Civ 487; [2013] WLR (D) 174 &#8220;A customer which as part of its business did betting on a betting exchange did not receive or negotiate bets so was not a bookmaker for the purposes of the Betting, Gaming and Lotteries Act [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-174">Regina (William Hill Organization Ltd) v Horserace Betting Levy Board and others [2013] EWCA Civ 487;  [2013] WLR (D)  174</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A customer which as part of its business did betting on a betting exchange did not receive or negotiate bets so was not a bookmaker for the purposes of the Betting, Gaming and Lotteries Act 1963 and was not liable to pay the horserace betting levy.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 3rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-william-hill-organization-ltd-v-horserace-betting-levy-board-and-others-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loveridge v Lambeth London Borough Council &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/loveridge-v-lambeth-london-borough-council-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/loveridge-v-lambeth-london-borough-council-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord & tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repossession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loveridge v Lambeth London Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 494; [2013] WLR (D) 173 &#8220;The valuation required by section 28(1) of the Housing Act 1988, in respect of damages for unlawful eviction under section 27, required that the propensity for the rights of a tenant of a local authority to change from those of a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-173">Loveridge v Lambeth London Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 494; [2013] WLR (D) 173</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The valuation required by section 28(1) of the Housing Act 1988, in respect of damages for unlawful eviction under section 27, required that the propensity for the rights of a tenant of a local authority to change from those of a secure tenant to those of an assured tenant on a sale of the reversion to a private landlord was to be factored into the hypothetical valuation of the landlord’s interest subject to the tenant’s rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 10th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/loveridge-v-lambeth-london-borough-council-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bar Council and Bar Standards Board 2nd biennial survey of the profession &#8211; The Bar Council</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bar-council-and-bar-standards-board-2nd-biennial-survey-of-the-profession-the-bar-council/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bar-council-and-bar-standards-board-2nd-biennial-survey-of-the-profession-the-bar-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[barristers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a time of unprecedented change in the way in which legal services are delivered, it has never been more important to gather the views of the profession about their experience of life at the Bar. The Bar Council and the Bar Standards Board (BSB) are carrying out the second biennial survey of the Bar, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a time of unprecedented change in the way in which legal services are delivered, it has never been more important to gather the views of the profession about their experience of life at the Bar. The Bar Council and the Bar Standards Board (BSB) are carrying out the second biennial survey of the Bar, the results of which will inform strategic planning and provide information on the working lives of barristers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/media-centre/news-and-press-releases/2013/may/bar-council-and-bar-standards-board-2nd-biennial-survey-of-the-profession/">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Bar Council, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.barcouncil.org.uk">www.barcouncil.org.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bar-council-and-bar-standards-board-2nd-biennial-survey-of-the-profession-the-bar-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal profession joins forces to oppose unreasonable legal aid proposals &#8211; The Bar Council</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/legal-profession-joins-forces-to-oppose-unreasonable-legal-aid-proposals-the-bar-council/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/legal-profession-joins-forces-to-oppose-unreasonable-legal-aid-proposals-the-bar-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[criminal justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Representatives of the Law Society and the Bar Council have joined forces with wider practitioner bodies to oppose the Ministry of Justice Consultation on proposed savage cuts to the funding of the Criminal Legal Aid Budget, the introduction of Price Competitive Tendering and other changes to the criminal justice system.&#8221; Full story The Bar Council, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Representatives of the Law Society and the Bar Council have joined forces with wider practitioner bodies to oppose the  Ministry of Justice Consultation on proposed savage cuts to the funding of the Criminal Legal Aid Budget, the introduction of Price Competitive Tendering and other changes to the criminal justice system.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/media-centre/news-and-press-releases/2013/may/legal-profession-joins-forces-to-oppose-unreasonable-legal-aid-proposals/">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Bar Council, 14th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.barcouncil.org.uk">www.barcouncil.org.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/legal-profession-joins-forces-to-oppose-unreasonable-legal-aid-proposals-the-bar-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government response to the report on the operation in 2012 of the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011 &#8211; Home Office</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/government-response-to-the-report-on-the-operation-in-2012-of-the-terrorism-prevention-and-investigation-measures-act-2011-home-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/government-response-to-the-report-on-the-operation-in-2012-of-the-terrorism-prevention-and-investigation-measures-act-2011-home-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Theresa May): In accordance with section 20(2), 20(3), 20(4) and 20(5) of the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation (David Anderson QC) prepared a report on the operation of the Act in 2012, which I laid before the House on [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Theresa May): In accordance with section 20(2), 20(3), 20(4) and 20(5) of the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation (David Anderson QC) prepared a report on the operation of the Act in 2012, which I laid before the House on 14 March 2013.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/government-response-to-the-report-on-the-operation-in-2012-of-the-terrorism-prevention-and-investigation-measures-act-2011">Full story</a></p>
<p>Home Office, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/home-office">www.gov.uk/home-office</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/government-response-to-the-report-on-the-operation-in-2012-of-the-terrorism-prevention-and-investigation-measures-act-2011-home-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stopping poor quality and time-wasting expert evidence in family courts &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stopping-poor-quality-and-time-wasting-expert-evidence-in-family-courts-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stopping-poor-quality-and-time-wasting-expert-evidence-in-family-courts-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;New national standards to raise the quality of experts used in family courts and get rid of time-consuming evidence which adds little value in helping judges reach a decision were announced by the Government today.&#8221; Full story Ministry of Justice, 16th May 2013 Source: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;New national standards to raise the quality of experts used in family courts and get rid of time-consuming evidence which adds little value in helping judges reach a decision were announced by the Government today.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/stopping-poor-quality-and-time-wasting-expert-evidence-in-family-courts">Full story</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice">www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stopping-poor-quality-and-time-wasting-expert-evidence-in-family-courts-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The President of the Methodist Conference (Appellant) v Preston (Respondent) &#8211; Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-president-of-the-methodist-conference-appellant-v-preston-respondent-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-president-of-the-methodist-conference-appellant-v-preston-respondent-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair dismissal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President of the Methodist Conference (Appellant) v Preston (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 29 &#124; UKSC 2012/0015 (YouTube) Supreme Court, 15th May 2013 Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsYOPSnunJA">The President of the Methodist Conference (Appellant) v Preston (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 29 | UKSC 2012/0015</a> (YouTube)</p>
<p>Supreme Court, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt">www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-president-of-the-methodist-conference-appellant-v-preston-respondent-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standards for expert witnesses in the family courts in England and Wales &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/standards-for-expert-witnesses-in-the-family-courts-in-england-and-wales-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/standards-for-expert-witnesses-in-the-family-courts-in-england-and-wales-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This is a consultation on minimum standards for expert witnesses providing evidence in the family courts in proceedings relating to children in England and Wales.&#8221; Full story Ministry of Justice, 16th May 2013 Source: www.justice.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is a consultation on minimum standards for expert witnesses providing evidence in the family courts in proceedings relating to children in England and Wales.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/expert-witnesses/consult_view">Full story</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk">www.justice.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/standards-for-expert-witnesses-in-the-family-courts-in-england-and-wales-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Uncut loses legal challenge over Goldman Sachs tax deal with HMRC &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/uk-uncut-loses-legal-challenge-over-goldman-sachs-tax-deal-with-hmrc-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/uk-uncut-loses-legal-challenge-over-goldman-sachs-tax-deal-with-hmrc-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HM Revenue & Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Campaign group UK Uncut Legal Action has lost its high court challenge over the legality of the &#8216;sweetheart&#8217; tax deal between HM Revenue and Customs and Goldman Sachs.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Campaign group UK Uncut Legal Action has lost its high court challenge over the legality of the &#8216;sweetheart&#8217; tax deal between HM Revenue and Customs and Goldman Sachs.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/16/uk-uncut-goldman-sachs-tax-deal-hmrc">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/uk-uncut-loses-legal-challenge-over-goldman-sachs-tax-deal-with-hmrc-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAILII: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1178/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1178/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court Methodist Conference v Preston (Rev 1) [2013] UKSC 29 (15 May 2013) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Odegbune &#038; Ors v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 711 (15 May 2013) Norris v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 712 (15 May 2013) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Doy v Gunn [2013] EWCA Civ 547 (08 May [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/29.html">Methodist Conference v Preston (Rev 1) [2013] UKSC 29 (15 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/711.html">Odegbune &#038; Ors v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 711 (15 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/712.html">Norris v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 712 (15 May 2013)</a>  </p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/547.html">Doy v Gunn [2013] EWCA Civ 547 (08 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/515.html">Hotak v London Borough of Southwark (Rev 1) [2013] EWCA Civ 515 (15 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/513.html">Watson, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames [2013] EWCA Civ 513 (15 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/516.html">United Marine Aggregates Ltd. v GM Welding &#038; Engineering Ltd &#038; Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 516 (14 May 2013)</a>    </p>
<p>High Court (Chancery Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2013/1278.html">Fons HF v Corporal Ltd [2013] EWHC 1278 (Ch) (09 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2013/1274.html">Kemsley v Barclays Bank Plc &#038; Ors [2013] EWHC 1274 (Ch) (15 May 2013)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Technology and Construction Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2013/1161.html">Hammersmatch Properties (Welwyn) Ltd v Saint -Gobain Ceramics and Plastics Ltd &#038; Anor [2013] EWHC 1161 (TCC) (14 May 2013)</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org">www.bailii.org</a>   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1178/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charity unable to claim rates relief &#8211; Wi-Fi transmitters were &#8220;minimal&#8221; use, says High Court &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/charity-unable-to-claim-rates-relief-wi-fi-transmitters-were-minimal-use-says-high-court-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/charity-unable-to-claim-rates-relief-wi-fi-transmitters-were-minimal-use-says-high-court-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A registered charity that provides free Wi-Fi services and broadcasts public safety messages using transmitters installed in otherwise empty commercial properties cannot claim business rates relief, the High Court has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 15th May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A registered charity that provides free Wi-Fi services and broadcasts public safety messages using transmitters installed in otherwise empty commercial properties cannot claim business rates relief, the High Court has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/charity-unable-to-claim-rates-relief---wi-fi-transmitters-were-minimal-use-says-high-court/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/charity-unable-to-claim-rates-relief-wi-fi-transmitters-were-minimal-use-says-high-court-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saudi princes fail to win sovereign immunity in UK court case &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/saudi-princes-fail-to-win-sovereign-immunity-in-uk-court-case-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/saudi-princes-fail-to-win-sovereign-immunity-in-uk-court-case-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Two senior Saudi princes have failed to extract themselves from English justice after the court of appeal upheld a ruling that they are not entitled to sovereign immunity in a case involving their London-based business interests.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Two senior Saudi princes have failed to extract themselves from English justice after the court of appeal upheld a ruling that they are not entitled to sovereign immunity in a case involving their London-based business interests.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/16/saudi-princes-fail-sovereign-immunity">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/saudi-princes-fail-to-win-sovereign-immunity-in-uk-court-case-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victoria station killing: Odegbune minimum tariff reduced &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/victoria-station-killing-odegbune-minimum-tariff-reduced-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/victoria-station-killing-odegbune-minimum-tariff-reduced-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grievous bodily harm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violent disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young offenders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A teenager convicted of murdering a schoolboy in Victoria Station has had his sentence&#8217;s minimum term reduced.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 15th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A teenager convicted of murdering a schoolboy in Victoria Station has had his sentence&#8217;s minimum term reduced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-22543537">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/victoria-station-killing-odegbune-minimum-tariff-reduced-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court rules that God is above the law &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/supreme-court-rules-that-god-is-above-the-law-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/supreme-court-rules-that-god-is-above-the-law-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair dismissal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It has passed judgments affecting multimillionaires, multinational banks and MPs but now Britain’s highest court has made clear that it does not have jurisdiction over God.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 15th May 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It has passed judgments affecting multimillionaires, multinational banks and MPs but now Britain’s highest court has made clear that it does not have jurisdiction over God.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10059489/Supreme-Court-rules-that-God-is-above-the-law.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/supreme-court-rules-that-god-is-above-the-law-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Priority need &#8211; NearlyLegal</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/priority-need-nearlylegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/priority-need-nearlylegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning difficulties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Hotak v Southwark LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 515 concerned a short point on whether an authority was entitled to have regard to the assistance that a homeless person would receive, in the event he became homeless, when determining whether he was vulnerable or not.&#8221; Full story NearlyLegal, 15th May 2013 Source: www.nearlylegal.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hotak v Southwark LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 515 concerned a short point on whether an authority was entitled to have regard to the assistance that a homeless person would receive, in the event he became homeless, when determining whether he was vulnerable or not.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2013/05/priority-need/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Nearlylegal+%28nearlylegal%29&#038;utm_term=feed">Full story</a></p>
<p>NearlyLegal, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.nearlylegal.co.uk">www.nearlylegal.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/priority-need-nearlylegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministers seek to cut £50m legal aid bill for expert witnesses in family courts &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ministers-seek-to-cut-50m-legal-aid-bill-for-expert-witnesses-in-family-courts-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ministers-seek-to-cut-50m-legal-aid-bill-for-expert-witnesses-in-family-courts-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Too many expert witnesses are being paid to give evidence of little value in family courts, according to the Ministry of Justice which is proposing a fresh round of cuts to legal aid.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Too many expert witnesses are being paid to give evidence of little value in family courts, according to the Ministry of Justice which is proposing a fresh round of cuts to legal aid.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/16/ministers-legal-aid-expert-witnesses">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ministers-seek-to-cut-50m-legal-aid-bill-for-expert-witnesses-in-family-courts-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We should have anonymity for people who have been arrested but not charged, says Theresa May &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministers' powers and duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Criminal suspects who have been arrested should not normally be named until they are charged, the Home Secretary has said.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 16th May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Criminal suspects who have been arrested should not normally be named until they are charged, the Home Secretary has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-8618255.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Widower to receive £150,000 payout linked to wife&#8217;s death in Oxfordshire &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/widower-to-receive-150000-payout-linked-to-wifes-death-in-oxfordshire-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/widower-to-receive-150000-payout-linked-to-wifes-death-in-oxfordshire-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alcohol abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A widower left with brain damage from alcohol abuse linked to the shock of his wife&#8217;s sudden death is to receive a £150,000 payout from the NHS.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 15th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A widower left with brain damage from alcohol abuse linked to the shock of his wife&#8217;s sudden death is to receive a £150,000 payout from the NHS.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-22539641">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/widower-to-receive-150000-payout-linked-to-wifes-death-in-oxfordshire-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Son jailed for 18 years at least for murdering mother after she threatened to disinherit him &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/son-jailed-for-18-years-at-least-for-murdering-mother-after-she-threatened-to-disinherit-him-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/son-jailed-for-18-years-at-least-for-murdering-mother-after-she-threatened-to-disinherit-him-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A carpet fitter who smothered his frail mother to death after she threatened to write him out of her will has been jailed for life and ordered to serve a minimum of 18 years.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 15th May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A carpet fitter who smothered his frail mother to death after she threatened to write him out of her will has been jailed for life and ordered to serve a minimum of 18 years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/son-jailed-for-18-years-at-least-for-murdering-mother-after-she-threatened-to-disinherit-him-8617691.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/son-jailed-for-18-years-at-least-for-murdering-mother-after-she-threatened-to-disinherit-him-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal aid cuts prompt top lawyers to leave the bar for careers on the bench &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/legal-aid-cuts-prompt-top-lawyers-to-leave-the-bar-for-careers-on-the-bench-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/legal-aid-cuts-prompt-top-lawyers-to-leave-the-bar-for-careers-on-the-bench-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[barristers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It has been dubbed the stampede for &#8216;the purple lifeboat&#8217; – applications to become judges have more than doubled over the past four years as senior lawyers seek professional sanctuary on the bench.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It has been dubbed the stampede for &#8216;the purple lifeboat&#8217; – applications to become judges have more than doubled over the past four years as senior lawyers seek professional sanctuary on the bench.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/16/lawyers-rush-to-become-judges-legal-aid">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/legal-aid-cuts-prompt-top-lawyers-to-leave-the-bar-for-careers-on-the-bench-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Lawrence judges: why we threw out David Norris appeal plea &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stephen-lawrence-judges-why-we-threw-out-david-norris-appeal-plea-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stephen-lawrence-judges-why-we-threw-out-david-norris-appeal-plea-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Appeal court justices say conviction was &#8216;unarguable&#8217; for racist murder of London teenager in 1993.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 15th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Appeal court justices say conviction was &#8216;unarguable&#8217; for racist murder of London teenager in 1993.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/15/stephen-lawrence-david-norris-appeal-racist-murder">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stephen-lawrence-judges-why-we-threw-out-david-norris-appeal-plea-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consent should be needed for anonymised data sharing to be lawful, say campaigners &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/consent-should-be-needed-for-anonymised-data-sharing-to-be-lawful-say-campaigners-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/consent-should-be-needed-for-anonymised-data-sharing-to-be-lawful-say-campaigners-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Businesses should have to ask for individuals&#8217; consent before sharing anonymised personal data with third parties, digital rights campaigners have said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 15th May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Businesses should have to ask for individuals&#8217; consent before sharing anonymised personal data with third parties, digital rights campaigners have said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/consent-should-be-needed-for-anonymised-data-sharing-to-be-lawful-say-campaigners/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 15th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/consent-should-be-needed-for-anonymised-data-sharing-to-be-lawful-say-campaigners-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
