<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>High court orders new approach to Iraq abuse inquiry &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-orders-new-approach-to-iraq-abuse-inquiry-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-orders-new-approach-to-iraq-abuse-inquiry-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[armed forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The high court has called for a new approach to an inquiry into allegations that British troops committed &#8216;terrifying acts of brutality&#8217; following the invasion of Iraq.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 24th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The high court has called for a new approach to an inquiry into allegations that British troops committed &#8216;terrifying acts of brutality&#8217; following the invasion of Iraq.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/24/high-court-iraq-abuse-inquiry">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-orders-new-approach-to-iraq-abuse-inquiry-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talent show mum Amanda Webber jailed for benefit fraud &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/talent-show-mum-amanda-webber-jailed-for-benefit-fraud-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/talent-show-mum-amanda-webber-jailed-for-benefit-fraud-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obtaining property by deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A mother of eight who fraudulently received £350,000 in benefits and tax credits has been jailed for four years.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 24th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A mother of eight who fraudulently received £350,000 in benefits and tax credits has been jailed for four years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-22652179#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/talent-show-mum-amanda-webber-jailed-for-benefit-fraud-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court: Sally Bercow&#8217;s Lord McAlpine tweet was libel &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-sally-bercows-lord-mcalpine-tweet-was-libel-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-sally-bercows-lord-mcalpine-tweet-was-libel-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A tweet published by Sally Bercow about Tory peer Lord McAlpine was libellous, the High Court has ruled.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 24th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A tweet published by Sally Bercow about Tory peer Lord McAlpine was libellous, the High Court has ruled.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-22652083#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-sally-bercows-lord-mcalpine-tweet-was-libel-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAILLI: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailli-recent-decisions-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailli-recent-decisions-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Barker v Lancashire County Council [2013] EWCA Civ 582 (23 May 2013) Newbold &#38; Ors v The Coal Authority [2013] EWCA Civ 584 (23 May 2013) Crinion &#38; Anor v IG Markets Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 587 (23 May 2013) Delaney v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/582.html">Barker v Lancashire County Council [2013] EWCA Civ 582 (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/584.html">Newbold &amp; Ors v The Coal Authority [2013] EWCA Civ 584 (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/587.html">Crinion &amp; Anor v IG Markets Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 587 (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/585.html">Delaney v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government &amp; Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 585 (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/578.html">Ben Nevis (Holdings) Ltd. &amp; Anor v Revenue &amp; Customs [2013] EWCA Civ 578 (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/818.html">X Ltd, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 818 (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>High Court (Administrative Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2013/1412.html">Mousa &amp; Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Defence [2013] EWHC 1412 (Admin) (24 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>High Court (Chancery Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2013/1378.html">Cosmichome Ltd v Southampton City Council [2013] EWHC 1378 (Ch) (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>High Court (Commercial Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2013/1323.html">Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v Unitech Ltd. &amp; Ors [2013] EWHC 1323 (Comm) (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2013/1355.html">White Rosebay Shipping SA v Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping Ltd [2013] EWHC 1355 (Comm) (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>High Court (Queen&#8217;s Bench Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2013/1409.html">Rogers &amp; Anor v Hoyle [2013] EWHC 1409 (QB) (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2013/1233.html">Ali v Ali &amp; Ors [2013] EWHC 1233 (QB) (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>High Court (Technology and Construction Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2013/1322.html">Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd v Higgins Construction Plc [2013] EWHC 1322 (TCC) (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2013/1242.html">Venulum Property Investments Ltd v Space Architecture Ltd &amp; Ors [2013] EWHC 1242 (TCC) (22 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org">www.bailii.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailli-recent-decisions-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodman and another v Goodman and another: In re Goodman (decd) &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/goodman-and-another-v-goodman-and-another-in-re-goodman-decd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/goodman-and-another-v-goodman-and-another-in-re-goodman-decd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[executors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goodman and another v Goodman and another: In re Goodman (decd): [2013] EWHC 758 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 197 &#8220;Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985, which contained a power to replace or remove personal representatives, applied to a person named as an executor in a will but who had not been granted [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2013-197">Goodman and another v Goodman and another: In re Goodman (decd): [2013] EWHC 758 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 197</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985, which contained a power to replace or remove personal representatives, applied to a person named as an executor in a will but who had not been granted probate.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 18th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/goodman-and-another-v-goodman-and-another-in-re-goodman-decd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melzer v MF Global UK Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/melzer-v-mf-global-uk-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/melzer-v-mf-global-uk-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conflict of laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Melzer v MF Global UK Ltd: (Case C-228/11); [2013] WLR (D) 196 &#8220;The special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 was not applicable where, in a case in which several people acting in different member states took part in allegedly harmful events, the action was brought [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2013-196">Melzer v MF Global UK Ltd: (Case C-228/11); [2013] WLR (D) 196</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 was not applicable where, in a case in which several people acting in different member states took part in allegedly harmful events, the action was brought against one of them who had not acted within the jurisdiction of the court seised, on the basis of a harmful event imputed to an accomplice or joint participant who was within the jurisdiction of the court, but who was not a party to the dispute.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/melzer-v-mf-global-uk-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re Tambrook Jersey Ltd; HSBC Bank plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/in-re-tambrook-jersey-ltd-hsbc-bank-plc-v-tambrook-jersey-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/in-re-tambrook-jersey-ltd-hsbc-bank-plc-v-tambrook-jersey-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re Tambrook Jersey Ltd: HSBC Bank plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd: [2013] EWCA 576; [2013] WLR (D) 193 &#8220;The English court could &#8216;assist&#8217; a foreign insolvency court for the purposes of section 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 where there were no existing insolvency proceedings in the foreign jurisdiction.&#8221; WLR Daily, 22nd May 2013 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2013-193">In re Tambrook Jersey Ltd: HSBC Bank plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd: [2013] EWCA 576; [2013] WLR (D) 193</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The English court could &#8216;assist&#8217; a foreign insolvency court for the purposes of section 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 where there were no existing insolvency proceedings in the foreign jurisdiction.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/in-re-tambrook-jersey-ltd-hsbc-bank-plc-v-tambrook-jersey-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SS (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ss-nigeria-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ss-nigeria-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SS (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2013] EWCA Civ 550;   [2013] WLR (D)  192 &#8220;A claim under article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms made in reliance on the interests of a child with British citizenship by a foreign criminal seeking to resist deportation [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2013-192">SS (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2013] EWCA Civ 550;   [2013] WLR (D)  192</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A claim under article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms made in reliance on the interests of a child with British citizenship by a foreign criminal seeking to resist deportation under section 32 of the UK Borders Act 2007 needed to be very strong to prevail given the pressing public interest in removal and the great weight to be attached to the policy of deporting foreign criminals by virtue of its origin in primary legislation. Only in extremely rare circumstances should a tribunal exercise an inquisitorial function on its own initiative in evaluating the interests of such a child.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ss-nigeria-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Statutory Instruments &#8211; legislation.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-483/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-483/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tribunal Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2013 The First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) (Amendment) Order 2013 The Qualifications for Appointment of Members to the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Amendment) Order 2013 The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Commencement No. 6) Order 2013 The Mobile Homes Act 2013 (Saving Provisions) (England) Order 2013 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1188/contents/made">The Tribunal Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1187/contents/made">The First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) (Amendment) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1185/contents/made">The Qualifications for Appointment of Members to the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Amendment) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1180/contents/made">The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Commencement No. 6) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1168/contents/made">The Mobile Homes Act 2013 (Saving Provisions) (England) Order 2013</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk">www.legislation.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-483/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Command Papers &#8211; official-documents.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/command-papers-official-documents-gov-uk-185/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/command-papers-official-documents-gov-uk-185/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[parliamentary papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International Tropical Timber, Agreement, 2006: Geneva, 27 January 2006, Cm 8617 (PDF) Source: www.official-documents.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm86/8617/8617.pdf">International Tropical Timber, Agreement, 2006: Geneva, 27 January 2006,<br />
Cm 8617 (PDF)</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.official-documents.gov.uk">www.official-documents.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/command-papers-official-documents-gov-uk-185/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are ready for post-Jackson role, vows High Court judge &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-are-ready-for-post-jackson-role-vows-high-court-judge-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-are-ready-for-post-jackson-role-vows-high-court-judge-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A High Court judge says there is a &#8216;real determination&#8217; among judges to embrace their new &#8216;project management&#8217; role, and dismissed fears that they are not ready for the Jackson reforms.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 24th May 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A High Court judge says there is a &#8216;real determination&#8217; among judges to embrace their new &#8216;project management&#8217; role, and dismissed fears that they are not ready for the Jackson reforms.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/we-ready-post-jackson-role-vows-high-court-judge">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-are-ready-for-post-jackson-role-vows-high-court-judge-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you decide who is to be your unpaid advocate? Eleanor Battie &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/can-you-decide-who-is-to-be-your-unpaid-advocate-eleanor-battie-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/can-you-decide-who-is-to-be-your-unpaid-advocate-eleanor-battie-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigants in person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKenzie friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;RE F (CHILDREN) 14 May 2013, Court of Appeal – A topical case, this, given legal aid cutbacks. It concerns the ability of unrepresented litigants to choose those to help them out as advocates in court. Not an unconstrained right, as this case demonstrates. The High Court ruled that a judge had been entitled to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;RE F (CHILDREN) 14 May 2013, Court of Appeal – A topical case, this, given legal aid cutbacks. It concerns the ability of unrepresented litigants to choose those to help them out as advocates in court. Not an unconstrained right, as this case demonstrates. The High Court ruled that a judge had been entitled to refuse an application for a particular person to act as a McKenzie friend despite that individual not being present in court at the time of the application. The Court of Appeal upheld that decision.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/05/24/can-you-decide-who-is-to-be-your-unpaid-advocate-eleanor-battie/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/can-you-decide-who-is-to-be-your-unpaid-advocate-eleanor-battie-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Date cross border group relief claim is made, not end of accounting period, will determine claim success, says Supreme Court &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/date-cross-border-group-relief-claim-is-made-not-end-of-accounting-period-will-determine-claim-success-says-supreme-court-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/date-cross-border-group-relief-claim-is-made-not-end-of-accounting-period-will-determine-claim-success-says-supreme-court-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Revenue & Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidiary companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The date when a claim for cross border group relief is made should form the basis of a decision about one of the tests for granting that relief under EU law and not the date of the end of the accounting period in which the claim was made, the Supreme Court has ruled.&#8221; Full story [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The date when a claim for cross border group relief is made should form the basis of a decision about one of the tests for granting that relief under EU law and not the date of the end of the accounting period in which the claim was made, the Supreme Court has ruled.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/date-cross-border-group-relief-claim-is-made-not-end-of-accounting-period-will-determine-claim-success-says-supreme-court/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/date-cross-border-group-relief-claim-is-made-not-end-of-accounting-period-will-determine-claim-success-says-supreme-court-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statutes in limbo: the campaign is not won until the law has been brought fully into effect &#8211; Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/statutes-in-limbo-the-campaign-is-not-won-until-the-law-has-been-brought-fully-into-effect-halsburys-law-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/statutes-in-limbo-the-campaign-is-not-won-until-the-law-has-been-brought-fully-into-effect-halsburys-law-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The passing of the Defamation Act 2013 was the cause of great celebration among campaigners for libel reform. This post is not concerned with the legal and social merits of that piece of legislation, which questions I will leave for more learned correspondents. No, amid all the excitement, and prompted by posts on Twitter from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The passing of the Defamation Act 2013 was the cause of great celebration among campaigners for libel reform. This post is not concerned with the legal and social merits of that piece of legislation, which questions I will leave for more learned correspondents. No, amid all the excitement, and prompted by posts on Twitter from @JackofKent and @HalsburysStats, I was struck, as is my wont, by a seemingly minor and technical point of statute law. This post therefore concerns a more general point about the coming into force of Acts of Parliament.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/statutes-in-limbo-the-campaign-is-not-won-until-the-law-has-been-brought-fully-into-effect/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange, 21st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk">www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/statutes-in-limbo-the-campaign-is-not-won-until-the-law-has-been-brought-fully-into-effect-halsburys-law-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Crime Falling? &#8211; Criminal Law and Justice Weekly</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/why-is-crime-falling-criminal-law-and-justice-weekly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/why-is-crime-falling-criminal-law-and-justice-weekly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young offenders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Vicki Helyar-Cardwell reports on a recent debate among criminal justice experts.&#8221; Full story Criminal Law and Justice Weekly, 18th May 2013 Source: www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Vicki Helyar-Cardwell reports on a recent debate among criminal justice experts.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/comment/Why-Crime-Falling">Full story</a></p>
<p>Criminal Law and Justice Weekly, 18th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk">www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/why-is-crime-falling-criminal-law-and-justice-weekly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefits cap will have catastrophic effect on families, court will hear &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/benefits-cap-will-have-catastrophic-effect-on-families-court-will-hear-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/benefits-cap-will-have-catastrophic-effect-on-families-court-will-hear-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Families will suffer catastrophic effects and victims of domestic violence may be forced to return to their abusers, it will be argued in the first test cases challenging the government&#8217;s imposition of a £500-a-week cap on benefits. A judge has already given permission for a full judicial review of claims that involve four vulnerable families [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Families will suffer catastrophic effects and victims of domestic violence may be forced to return to their abusers, it will be argued in the first test cases challenging the government&#8217;s imposition of a £500-a-week cap on benefits. A judge has already given permission for a full judicial review of claims that involve four vulnerable families relying on welfare payments. One household is facing imminent eviction, according to documents filed at the high court.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/may/23/benefits-cap-catastrophic-effect-families">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/benefits-cap-will-have-catastrophic-effect-on-families-court-will-hear-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phone-hacking victims reject newspapers&#8217; charter proposal &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/phone-hacking-victims-reject-newspapers-charter-proposal-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/phone-hacking-victims-reject-newspapers-charter-proposal-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Some of the most prominent victims of phone-hacking have written to the culture secretary, Maria Miller, urging her to reject the royal charter proposed by the press industry, saying that it is unacceptable for &#8216;those responsible for the damage to our lives and the lives of others [to] seek to shrug off responsibility and once [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some of the most prominent victims of phone-hacking have written to the culture secretary, Maria Miller, urging her to reject the royal charter proposed by the press industry, saying that it is unacceptable for &#8216;those responsible for the damage to our lives and the lives of others [to] seek to shrug off responsibility and once again write their own rulebook.&#8217; &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/may/24/phone-hacking-reject-charter-proposal">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/phone-hacking-victims-reject-newspapers-charter-proposal-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bipolar woman wins High Court battle for right to have abortion &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bipolar-woman-wins-high-court-battle-for-right-to-have-abortion-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bipolar-woman-wins-high-court-battle-for-right-to-have-abortion-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A pregnant woman with severe mental health problems is expected to have an abortion after a High Court judge ruled that she was capable of making the decision.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 21st May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A pregnant woman with severe mental health problems is expected to have an abortion after a High Court judge ruled that she was capable of making the decision.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bipolar-woman-wins-high-court-battle-for-right-to-have-abortion-8626217.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 21st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bipolar-woman-wins-high-court-battle-for-right-to-have-abortion-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hunt for Britain&#8217;s Sex Gangs &#8211; Channel 4 Dispatches</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-hunt-for-britains-sex-gangs-channel-4-dispatches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-hunt-for-britains-sex-gangs-channel-4-dispatches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual grooming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In 2010 Telford police allowed cameras to start filming what was to become one of the biggest child sex abuse cases in the UK.&#8221; 4oD Channel 4 Dispatches, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.channel4.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In 2010 Telford police allowed cameras to start filming what was to become one of the biggest child sex abuse cases in the UK.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/4od">4oD</a></p>
<p>Channel 4 Dispatches, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.channel4.com">www.channel4.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-hunt-for-britains-sex-gangs-channel-4-dispatches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talent show mum Amanda Webber guilty of £350,000 benefit fraud &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/talent-show-mum-amanda-webber-guilty-of-350000-benefit-fraud-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/talent-show-mum-amanda-webber-guilty-of-350000-benefit-fraud-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obtaining property by deception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A mother of eight has been found guilty of fraudulently receiving more than £350,000 in benefits and tax credits.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A mother of eight has been found guilty of fraudulently receiving more than £350,000 in benefits and tax credits.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-22648485#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/talent-show-mum-amanda-webber-guilty-of-350000-benefit-fraud-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report into Rochdale grooming a &#8216;damning indictment&#8217; of council &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/report-into-rochdale-grooming-a-damning-indictment-of-council-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/report-into-rochdale-grooming-a-damning-indictment-of-council-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual grooming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A new report into the child sex grooming scandal in Rochdale is a &#8216;damning indictment&#8217; of the local council, the town&#8217;s MP said.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 24th May 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A new report into the child sex grooming scandal in Rochdale is a &#8216;damning indictment&#8217; of the local council, the town&#8217;s MP said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10077528/Report-into-Rochdale-grooming-a-damning-indictment-of-council.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/report-into-rochdale-grooming-a-damning-indictment-of-council-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ban for teacher who spent two years trying to woo pupil, 15 &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ban-for-teacher-who-spent-two-years-trying-to-woo-pupil-15-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ban-for-teacher-who-spent-two-years-trying-to-woo-pupil-15-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breach of trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqualification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A geography teacher has been banned from teaching indefinitely after she &#8216;romantically pursued&#8217; a pupil for almost two years.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 24th May 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A geography teacher has been banned from teaching indefinitely after she<br />
&#8216;romantically pursued&#8217; a pupil for almost two years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10077038/Ban-for-teacher-who-spent-two-years-trying-to-woo-pupil-15.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 24th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ban-for-teacher-who-spent-two-years-trying-to-woo-pupil-15-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaws in fraud case show worrying lapses by judges and lawyers &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/flaws-in-fraud-case-show-worrying-lapses-by-judges-and-lawyers-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/flaws-in-fraud-case-show-worrying-lapses-by-judges-and-lawyers-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Anthony White admitted fraud over mortgages, but analysis seems to show problems that senior judges failed to spot.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anthony White admitted fraud over mortgages, but analysis seems to show problems that senior judges failed to spot.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/23/fraud-case-lapses-judges-lawyers?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/flaws-in-fraud-case-show-worrying-lapses-by-judges-and-lawyers-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GP Davinder Jeet Bains jailed for filming abuse of patients &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/gp-davinder-jeet-bains-jailed-for-filming-abuse-of-patients-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/gp-davinder-jeet-bains-jailed-for-filming-abuse-of-patients-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual offences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video recordings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A family doctor who used a secret camera inside his wristwatch to record himself abusing female patients at his surgery has been jailed for 12 years.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A family doctor who used a secret camera inside his wristwatch to record himself abusing female patients at his surgery has been jailed for 12 years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-22636726#?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/gp-davinder-jeet-bains-jailed-for-filming-abuse-of-patients-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genson Courtney murder: Pair jailed for &#8216;execution&#8217; of drug dealing stepson of gangland author Dave Courtney &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/genson-courtney-murder-pair-jailed-for-execution-of-drug-dealing-stepson-of-gangland-author-dave-courtney-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/genson-courtney-murder-pair-jailed-for-execution-of-drug-dealing-stepson-of-gangland-author-dave-courtney-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Two men have been jailed for life for shooting the stepson of gangland celebrity and author Dave Courtney.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Two men have been jailed for life for shooting the stepson of gangland celebrity and author Dave Courtney.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/genson-courtney-murder-pair-jailed-for-execution-of-drug-dealing-stepson-of-gangland-author-dave-courtney-8629376.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/genson-courtney-murder-pair-jailed-for-execution-of-drug-dealing-stepson-of-gangland-author-dave-courtney-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillsborough &#8211; How They Buried the Truth &#8211; Panorama</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/hillsborough-how-they-buried-the-truth-panorama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/hillsborough-how-they-buried-the-truth-panorama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[health & safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Panorama investigation reveals how police, politicians, lawyers and judges all played a part in burying the truth about Britain&#8217;s worst football disaster. Never-before-broadcast footage of the FA Cup semi-final in which 96 Liverpool fans died reveals a catastrophic failure by the emergency services, how lives might have been saved and how subsequent inquiries were [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Panorama investigation reveals how police, politicians, lawyers and judges all played a part in burying the truth about Britain&#8217;s worst football disaster.</p>
<p>Never-before-broadcast footage of the FA Cup semi-final in which 96 Liverpool fans died reveals a catastrophic failure by the emergency services, how lives might have been saved and how subsequent inquiries were misled.</p>
<p>And a former home secretary and former police chiefs are put on the spot about why a succession of official investigations left the truth hidden for a generation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01svp5s/Panorama_Hillsborough_How_They_Buried_the_Truth/">iPlayer</a></p>
<p>BBC Panorama, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/hillsborough-how-they-buried-the-truth-panorama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Command Papers &#8211; official-documents.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/command-papers-official-documents-gov-uk-184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/command-papers-official-documents-gov-uk-184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[parliamentary papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consultation on options to reduce electricity demand &#8211; Government Response, Cm 8631 (PDF) Source: www.official-documents.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm86/8631/8631.pdf?utm_source=feedly">Consultation on options to reduce electricity demand &#8211; Government Response, Cm 8631</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.official-documents.gov.uk">www.official-documents.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/command-papers-official-documents-gov-uk-184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Statutory Instruments &#8211; legislation.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-482/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-482/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cash Ratio Deposits (Value Bands and Ratios) Order 2013 The Chemical Weapons (Licence Appeal Provisions) (Revocation) (No. 2) Order 2013 The Merchant Shipping (Categorisation of Registries of Relevant British Possessions) (Amendment) Order 2013 The Penalties for Disorderly Behaviour (Amount of Penalty) (Amendment) Order 2013 The Gas and Petroleum (Consents) Charges Regulations 2013 The Official [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1189/made?utm_source=feedly">The Cash Ratio Deposits (Value Bands and Ratios) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1129/made?utm_source=feedly">The Chemical Weapons (Licence Appeal Provisions) (Revocation) (No. 2) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1115/made?utm_source=feedly">The Merchant Shipping (Categorisation of Registries of Relevant British Possessions) (Amendment) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1165/made?utm_source=feedly">The Penalties for Disorderly Behaviour (Amount of Penalty) (Amendment) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1138/made?utm_source=feedly">The Gas and Petroleum (Consents) Charges Regulations 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1163/made?utm_source=feedly">The Official Statistics Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1147/made?utm_source=feedly">The Street Works (Charges for Occupation of the Highway) (Kent County Council) Order 2013</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1118/made?utm_source=feedly">The Inspectors of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (No. 4) Order 2013</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk">www.legislation.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-482/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAILII: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hobson v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 819 (23 May 2013) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd v Ampurius Nu Homes Holdings Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 577 (23 May 2013) High Court (Queen&#8217;s Bench Division) Corbett v Cumbria Kart Racing Club &#038; Ors [2013] EWHC 1362 (QB) (22 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/819.html">Hobson v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 819 (23 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/577.html">Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd v Ampurius Nu Homes Holdings Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 577 (23 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p>High Court (Queen&#8217;s Bench Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2013/1362.html">Corbett v Cumbria Kart Racing Club &#038; Ors [2013] EWHC 1362 (QB) (22 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p>High Court (Administrative Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2013/1379.html">Mustafa, R (on the application of) v The Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2013] EWHC 1379 (Admin) (23 May 2013) </a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org">www.bailii.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Law and Cohabitation &#8211; BBC Unreliable Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-law-and-cohabitation-bbc-unreliable-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-law-and-cohabitation-bbc-unreliable-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In the first of a new series, Clive Anderson&#8217;s guests struggle to reconcile their differences regarding reform of the way the law treats unmarried cohabiting couples when their relationships break up.&#8221; Listen BBC Unreliable Evidence, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the first of a new series, Clive Anderson&#8217;s guests struggle to reconcile their differences regarding reform of the way the law treats unmarried cohabiting couples when their relationships break up.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01sjj7z">Listen </a></p>
<p>BBC Unreliable Evidence, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source:<a href="http:// www.bbc.co.uk"> www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/the-law-and-cohabitation-bbc-unreliable-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers protest outside parliament against legal aid cuts &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lawyers-protest-outside-parliament-against-legal-aid-cuts-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lawyers-protest-outside-parliament-against-legal-aid-cuts-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[criminal justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscarriage of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Hundreds, some wearing wigs and gowns, demonstrate against justice secretary&#8217;s plans, which they say undermine UK justice.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hundreds, some wearing wigs and gowns, demonstrate against justice secretary&#8217;s plans, which they say undermine UK justice.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/22/lawyers-protest-parliament-legal-aid-cuts">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lawyers-protest-outside-parliament-against-legal-aid-cuts-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man jailed for smothering mother &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/man-jailed-for-smothering-mother-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/man-jailed-for-smothering-mother-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[diminished responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guilty pleas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlawful killing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A man who smothered and strangled his mother has been jailed for 13 years, police said today.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A man who smothered and strangled his mother has been jailed for 13 years, police said today.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/22/cumbria-mother-killing?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/man-jailed-for-smothering-mother-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commissioners for Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Marks and Spencer plc (Respondent); Commissioners for Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v Marks and Spencer plc (Appellant) &#8211; Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/commissioners-for-her-majestys-revenue-and-customs-appellant-v-marks-and-spencer-plc-respondent-commissioners-for-her-majestys-revenue-and-customs-respondent-v-marks-and-spencer-plc-appell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/commissioners-for-her-majestys-revenue-and-customs-appellant-v-marks-and-spencer-plc-respondent-commissioners-for-her-majestys-revenue-and-customs-respondent-v-marks-and-spencer-plc-appell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Revenue & Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidiary companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commissioners for Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Marks and Spencer plc (Respondent); Commissioners for Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v Marks and Spencer plc (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 30 (YouTube) Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4QCzjpX4gM">Commissioners for Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Marks and Spencer plc (Respondent); Commissioners for Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v Marks and Spencer plc (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 30</a> (YouTube)</p>
<p>Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt">www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/commissioners-for-her-majestys-revenue-and-customs-appellant-v-marks-and-spencer-plc-respondent-commissioners-for-her-majestys-revenue-and-customs-respondent-v-marks-and-spencer-plc-appell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now called mvf3 Apps) and others (Appellants) v Bestnet Europe Limited and others (Respondents) &#8211; Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/vestergaard-frandsen-as-now-called-mvf3-apps-and-others-appellants-v-bestnet-europe-limited-and-others-respondents-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/vestergaard-frandsen-as-now-called-mvf3-apps-and-others-appellants-v-bestnet-europe-limited-and-others-respondents-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract of employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now called mvf3 Apps) and others (Appellants) v Bestnet Europe Limited and others (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 31 &#124; UKSC 2011/0144 (YouTube) Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCSUYUaQqbU">Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now called mvf3 Apps) and others (Appellants) v Bestnet Europe Limited and others (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 31 | UKSC 2011/0144</a> (YouTube)</p>
<p>Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt">www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/vestergaard-frandsen-as-now-called-mvf3-apps-and-others-appellants-v-bestnet-europe-limited-and-others-respondents-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Prosecution Service (Respondent) v McKee (Appellant) &#8211; Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/public-prosecution-service-respondent-v-mckee-appellant-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/public-prosecution-service-respondent-v-mckee-appellant-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[admissibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public Prosecution Service (Respondent) v McKee (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 32 &#124; UKSC 2012/0007 (YouTube) Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tcsdx3fYg6E">Public Prosecution Service (Respondent) v McKee (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 32 | UKSC 2012/0007</a> (YouTube)</p>
<p>Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt">www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/public-prosecution-service-respondent-v-mckee-appellant-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 36: Dominic Regan’s cut out &amp; keep survival guide &#8211; New Law Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/part-36-dominic-regans-cut-out-keep-survival-guide-new-law-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/part-36-dominic-regans-cut-out-keep-survival-guide-new-law-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil procedure rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 36 offers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Dominic Regan’s exclusive Pt 36 survival guide.&#8221; Full story New Law Journal, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.newjournal.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dominic Regan’s exclusive Pt 36 survival guide.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/part-36-dominic-regan%E2%80%99s-cut-out-keep-survival-guide">Full story</a></p>
<p>New Law Journal, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.newjournal.co.uk">www.newjournal.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/part-36-dominic-regans-cut-out-keep-survival-guide-new-law-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marks &amp; Spencer plc v Revenue and Customs Commissioners &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/marks-spencer-plc-v-revenue-and-customs-commissioners-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/marks-spencer-plc-v-revenue-and-customs-commissioners-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Revenue & Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidiary companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marks &#038; Spencer plc v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKSC 30; [2013] WLR (D) 191 &#8220;The inquiry as to whether a parent company established in the United Kingdom was entitled to cross-border group relief in respect of the losses of its non-resident subsidiaries was to be conducted on the basis of the circumstances existing [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-191">Marks &#038; Spencer plc v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKSC 30; [2013] WLR (D) 191</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The inquiry as to whether a parent company established in the United Kingdom was entitled to cross-border group relief in respect of the losses of its non-resident subsidiaries was to be conducted on the basis of the circumstances existing as at the date of its claim, and not at the end of the accounting period in which those losses crystallised.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/marks-spencer-plc-v-revenue-and-customs-commissioners-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (EO and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-eo-and-others-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-eo-and-others-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (EO and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1236 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 190 &#8220;In deciding when an immigrant into the United Kingdom should not be detained because they had been tortured the definition of torture in the Secretary of State’s detention policy in force before January 2013 was [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-190">Regina (EO and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1236 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 190</a></p>
<p>&#8220;In deciding when an immigrant into the United Kingdom should not be detained because they had been tortured the definition of torture in the Secretary of State’s detention policy in force before January 2013 was any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, was intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person had committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based upon discrimination of any kind.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-eo-and-others-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/aaa-v-associated-newspapers-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/aaa-v-associated-newspapers-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paternity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 554; [2013] WLR (D) 189 &#8220;Where a judge at first instance had carried out the careful balancing exercise required in respect of an individual’s right of privacy and a publisher’s right of freedom of expression, an appellate court should not intervene unless the judge had erred in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-189">AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 554; [2013] WLR (D) 189</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Where a judge at first instance had carried out the careful balancing exercise required in respect of an individual’s right of privacy and a publisher’s right of freedom of expression, an appellate court should not intervene unless the judge had erred in principle, or reached a conclusion which was plainly wrong or outside the ambit of conclusions that could reasonably be reached.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 20th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/aaa-v-associated-newspapers-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re ITN News and others &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/in-re-itn-news-and-others-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/in-re-itn-news-and-others-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witnesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re ITN News and others [2013] EWCA Crim 773; [2013] WLR (D) 187 &#8220;The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) had jurisdiction under section 159 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to entertain an appeal against an order under section 46 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 prohibiting the reporting of any [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-187">In re ITN News and others [2013] EWCA Crim 773; [2013] WLR (D) 187</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) had jurisdiction under section 159 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to entertain an appeal against an order under section 46 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 prohibiting the reporting of any matter relating to a witness, even where the court was not otherwise concerned with any proceedings between the defendant at trial and the Crown or any issue arising from it.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 21st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/in-re-itn-news-and-others-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (Trail Riders Fellowship and another) v Dorset County Council &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-trail-riders-fellowship-and-another-v-dorset-county-council-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-trail-riders-fellowship-and-another-v-dorset-county-council-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights of way]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (Trail Riders Fellowship and another) v Dorset County Council [2013] EWCA Civ 553; [2013] WLR (D) 186 &#8220;A map produced to a scale of 1:25,000, even if digitally derived from an original map of a different scale, satisfied the requirements for a map accompanying an application to modify a right of way that were [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-186">Regina (Trail Riders Fellowship and another) v Dorset County Council [2013] EWCA Civ 553; [2013] WLR (D)  186</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A map produced to a scale of 1:25,000, even if digitally derived from an original map of a different scale, satisfied the requirements for a map accompanying an application to modify a right of way that were set out in paragraph 1(a) of Schedule 14 to the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 20th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-trail-riders-fellowship-and-another-v-dorset-county-council-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Birmingham City Council v James (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/birmingham-city-council-v-james-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-intervening-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/birmingham-city-council-v-james-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-intervening-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASBOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Birmingham City Council v James (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2013] EWCA Civ 552; [2013] WLR (D) 185 &#8220;If the conditions in section 34 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009 were met then an injunction to prevent gang-related violence was appropriate. The court would not be required to ask itself whether [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-185">Birmingham City Council v James (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2013] EWCA Civ 552; [2013] WLR (D) 185</a></p>
<p>&#8220;If the conditions in section 34 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009 were met then an injunction to prevent gang-related violence was appropriate. The court would not be required to ask itself whether an anti-social behaviour order under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 would have provided an adequate remedy.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/birmingham-city-council-v-james-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-intervening-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court bares post-Jackson teeth with stricter approach to relief from sanctions &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-with-stricter-approach-to-relief-from-sanctions-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-with-stricter-approach-to-relief-from-sanctions-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil procedure rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The High Court has sent the first sign of a hardened stance against missed deadlines since the new Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) came into force.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The High Court has sent the first sign of a hardened stance against missed deadlines since the new Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) came into force.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-stricter-approach-relief-sanctions?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-with-stricter-approach-to-relief-from-sanctions-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing the loophole: Care services and human rights protection &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/closing-the-loophole-care-services-and-human-rights-protection-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/closing-the-loophole-care-services-and-human-rights-protection-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elderly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Much of the House of Lords debate surrounding yesterday’s Second Reading of the Care and Support Bill focused on seeking solutions to complex issues around the future provision of care. Additionally, as several peers flagged, the Bill also provides a timely opportunity to clarify which bodies have legal obligations to uphold protections under the Human [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Much of the House of Lords debate surrounding yesterday’s Second Reading of the Care and Support Bill focused on seeking solutions to complex issues around the future provision of care. Additionally, as several peers flagged, the Bill also provides a timely opportunity to clarify which bodies have legal obligations to uphold protections under the Human Rights Act. Baroness Campbell noted &#8216;those who receive their care not from a public authority but from a private body lack the full protection of the Human Rights Act…[This] is a loophole that must be closed.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/05/22/closing-the-loophole-care-services-and-human-rights-protection-sanchita-hosali-and-helen-wildbore/?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/closing-the-loophole-care-services-and-human-rights-protection-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out-of-date planning guidance will not be cancelled immediately, says Boles &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/out-of-date-planning-guidance-will-not-be-cancelled-immediately-says-boles-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/out-of-date-planning-guidance-will-not-be-cancelled-immediately-says-boles-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government has rejected a recommendation in a planning guidance review by Lord Taylor of Goss Moor to immediately cancel all out-of-date guidance before new guidance is published.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government has rejected a recommendation in a planning guidance review by Lord Taylor of Goss Moor to immediately cancel all out-of-date guidance before new guidance is published.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/out-of-date-planning-guidance-will-not-be-cancelled-immediately-says-boles/?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/out-of-date-planning-guidance-will-not-be-cancelled-immediately-says-boles-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court rules that billionaire fraudster should lose three luxury properties &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-rules-that-billionaire-fraudster-should-lose-three-luxury-properties-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-rules-that-billionaire-fraudster-should-lose-three-luxury-properties-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[assets recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceeds of crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A billionaire fraudster is set to lose three of his luxury properties in Britain&#8217;s most exclusive postcodes after a High Court ruling.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A billionaire fraudster is set to lose three of his luxury properties in Britain&#8217;s most exclusive postcodes after a High Court ruling.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/high-court-rules-that-billionaire-fraudster-should-lose-three-luxury-properties-8628053.html?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-rules-that-billionaire-fraudster-should-lose-three-luxury-properties-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banned driver who mowed down cyclists is jailed for 10 years &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/banned-driver-who-mowed-down-cyclists-is-jailed-for-10-years-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/banned-driver-who-mowed-down-cyclists-is-jailed-for-10-years-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqualification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perverting the course of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A disqualified driver fleeing police was jailed for 10 years and six months on Wednesday for killing a couple he mowed down in a car as they rode their tandem bike.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A disqualified driver fleeing police was jailed for 10 years and six months on Wednesday for killing a couple he mowed down in a car as they rode their tandem bike.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/22/driver-mowed-down-tandem-jailed?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/banned-driver-who-mowed-down-cyclists-is-jailed-for-10-years-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAILII: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court Vestergaard Frandsen A/S &#038; Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd &#038; Ors [2013] UKSC 31 (22 May 2013) Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc [2013] UKSC 30 (22 May 2013) Public Prosecution Service v McKee (Northern Ireland) [2013] UKSC 32 (22 May 2013) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sandiford, R (on the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/31.html">Vestergaard Frandsen A/S &#038; Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd &#038; Ors [2013] UKSC 31 (22 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/30.html">Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc [2013] UKSC 30 (22 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/32.html">Public Prosecution Service v McKee (Northern Ireland) [2013] UKSC 32 (22 May 2013)</a>  </p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/581.html">Sandiford, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign &#038; Commonwealth Affairs [2013] EWCA Civ 581 (22 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/576.html">HSBC Bank Plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 576 (22 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/586.html">Mohan v Mohan [2013] EWCA Civ 586 (22 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/583.html">Novartis AG v Hospira UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 583 (22 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/555.html">Hill, R (on the application of) v Institute of Chartered Accountants In England and Wales [2013] EWCA Civ 555 (22 May 2013) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/545.html">Hide v The Steeplechase Company (Cheltenham) Ltd &#038; Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 545 (22 May 2013)</a> </p>
<p>High Court (Chancery Division)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2013/1364.html">Doosan Power Systems Ltd v Babcock International Group Plc &#038; Anor [2013] EWHC 1364 (Ch) (22 May 2013)</a>   </p>
<p>High Court (Administrative Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2013/1360.html">M, R (on the application of) v The Parole Board &#038; Anor [2013] EWHC 1360 (Admin) (22 May 2013)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2013/1272.html">A B C v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1272 (Admin) (22 May 2013)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Commercial Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2013/895.html">E &#038; Ors v M [2013] EWHC 895 (Comm) (08 May 2013)</a>  </p>
<p>High Court (Patents Court)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2013/886.html">Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Novartis Ag [2013] EWHC 886 (Pat) (12 April 2013)</a> </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org">www.bailii.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/bailii-recent-decisions-1183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closed material and closed proceedings in FOIA litigation: authoritative guidance from the Upper Tribunal &#8211; Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/closed-material-and-closed-proceedings-in-foia-litigation-authoritative-guidance-from-the-upper-tribunal-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/closed-material-and-closed-proceedings-in-foia-litigation-authoritative-guidance-from-the-upper-tribunal-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Closed material and closed proceedings are commonplace in FOIA litigation. As regards the disputed information itself, the need is self-explanatory. But what about closed material other than the disputed information, such as evidence in support of a public authority’s reliance on exemptions? To what extent is it appropriate for FOIA proceedings to be determined by [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Closed material and closed proceedings are commonplace in FOIA litigation. As regards the disputed information itself, the need is self-explanatory. But what about closed material other than the disputed information, such as evidence in support of a public authority’s reliance on exemptions? To what extent is it appropriate for FOIA proceedings to be determined by reference to such material which the requester is unable to see and challenge? Also, if the public authority’s concern is with public disclosure of such material, is the solution to be found in a readiness to bring the requester’s legal representatives into a ‘confidentiality ring’? In other words, do natural and open justice demand that requesters’ legal representatives be allowed to attend the closed part of the hearing and see the closed material?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com/2013/05/22/closed-material-and-closed-proceedings-in-foia-litigation-authoritative-guidance-from-the-upper-tribunal/?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>Panopticon, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com">www.panopticonblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/closed-material-and-closed-proceedings-in-foia-litigation-authoritative-guidance-from-the-upper-tribunal-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two win sickness benefit test legal challenge &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/two-win-sickness-benefit-test-legal-challenge-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/two-win-sickness-benefit-test-legal-challenge-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Two people with mental health problems, who claimed the test for sickness benefit would discriminate against them, have won their legal challenge.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Two people with mental health problems, who claimed the test for sickness benefit would discriminate against them, have won their legal challenge.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22620894#?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/two-win-sickness-benefit-test-legal-challenge-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
