<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; parliament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/parliament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:49:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>At-a-glance: Queen&#8217; Speech 2013 bill-by-bill &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/at-a-glance-queen-speech-2013-bill-by-bill-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/at-a-glance-queen-speech-2013-bill-by-bill-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 09:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Queen&#8217;s Speech sets out the government&#8217;s legislative programme for the next year. Here is a guide to all the bills in it.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 8th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Queen&#8217;s Speech sets out the government&#8217;s legislative programme for the next<br />
year. Here is a guide to all the bills in it.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22436103#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 8th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/at-a-glance-queen-speech-2013-bill-by-bill-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queen&#8217;s speeches since 1994: how many bills did they introduce? &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/queens-speeches-since-1994-how-many-bills-did-they-introduce-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/queens-speeches-since-1994-how-many-bills-did-they-introduce-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Ahead of the 2013 state opening of parliament, we look at how long the Queen&#8217;s speech has been over the last two decades, and how many bills it introduced.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 7th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ahead of the 2013 state opening of parliament, we look at how long the Queen&#8217;s speech has been over the last two decades, and how many bills it introduced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2013/may/07/queens-speech-state-opening-parliament">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 7th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/queens-speeches-since-1994-how-many-bills-did-they-introduce-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carers to receive legal rights under new laws &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/carers-to-receive-legal-rights-under-new-laws-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/carers-to-receive-legal-rights-under-new-laws-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 10:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial provision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Hundreds of thousands of people who care for elderly or disabled relations will be given new rights to state support for the first time, Norman Lamb, the Care and Support Minister, says.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 7th May 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hundreds of thousands of people who care for elderly or disabled relations will be given new rights to state support for the first time, Norman Lamb, the Care and Support Minister, says.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10040248/Carers-to-receive-legal-rights-under-new-laws.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 7th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/carers-to-receive-legal-rights-under-new-laws-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queen&#8217;s speech: consumer bill of rights to cover faulty apps or downloads &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/queens-speech-consumer-bill-of-rights-to-cover-faulty-apps-or-downloads-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/queens-speech-consumer-bill-of-rights-to-cover-faulty-apps-or-downloads-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 08:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Consumer rights covering products such as cars and white goods are to be extended to apps and music downloads in a consumer bill of rights to be unveiled in the Queen&#8217;s speech on Wednesday.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 6th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Consumer rights covering products such as cars and white goods are to be extended to apps and music downloads in a consumer bill of rights to be unveiled in the Queen&#8217;s speech on Wednesday.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2013/may/06/queens-speech-consumer-bill-of-rights">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 6th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/queens-speech-consumer-bill-of-rights-to-cover-faulty-apps-or-downloads-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should parliament give itself more powers? &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/should-parliament-give-itself-more-powers-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/should-parliament-give-itself-more-powers-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[constitutional reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Should parliament give itself more powers? That&#8217;s the intriguing question posed by a paper to be published next week by the Constitution Society, an educational charity established five years ago.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 2nd May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Should parliament give itself more powers? That&#8217;s the intriguing question posed by a paper to be published next week by the Constitution Society, an educational charity established five years ago.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/may/02/parliament-give-itself-more-powers">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 2nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/should-parliament-give-itself-more-powers-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs’ expenses: copies of receipts are subject to FOIA &#8211; Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/mps-expenses-copies-of-receipts-are-subject-to-foia-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/mps-expenses-copies-of-receipts-are-subject-to-foia-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Following the MPs’ expenses scandal, the then newly-founded Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) decided that it would not routinely publish images of the receipts submitted to IPSA by MPs in support of their expenses claims. Rather, only text transcribed from the submitted receipts was to be published.&#8221; Full story Panopticon, 29th April 2013 Source: www.panopticonblog.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Following the MPs’ expenses scandal, the then newly-founded Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) decided that it would not routinely publish images of the receipts submitted to IPSA by MPs in support of their expenses claims.  Rather, only text transcribed from the submitted receipts was to be published.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com/2013/04/29/mps-expenses-copies-of-receipts-are-subject-to-foia/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Panopticon, 29th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com">www.panopticonblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/mps-expenses-copies-of-receipts-are-subject-to-foia-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice and Security Act 2013 &#8211; legislation.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/justice-and-security-act-2013-legislation-gov-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/justice-and-security-act-2013-legislation-gov-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Full text of Act Source: www.legislation.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/18/contents/enacted">Full text of Act</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk">www.legislation.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/justice-and-security-act-2013-legislation-gov-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health and safety automatic civil liability to end as House of Lords accepts Government&#8217;s plans &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/health-and-safety-automatic-civil-liability-to-end-as-house-of-lords-accepts-governments-plans-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/health-and-safety-automatic-civil-liability-to-end-as-house-of-lords-accepts-governments-plans-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health & safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strict liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The House of Lords has approved Government plans to prevent companies from being automatically liable for some workplace injuries after a second vote on the issue.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 24th April 2013 Soure: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The House of Lords has approved Government plans to prevent companies from being<br />
automatically liable for some workplace injuries after a second vote on the<br />
issue.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/april/health-and-safety-civil-liability-to-end-as-house-of-lords-accepts-governments-plans/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 24th April 2013</p>
<p>Soure: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/health-and-safety-automatic-civil-liability-to-end-as-house-of-lords-accepts-governments-plans-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bar Council welcomes House of Lords report on EU Opt-out &#8211; The Bar Council</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/bar-council-welcomes-house-of-lords-report-on-eu-opt-out-the-bar-council/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/bar-council-welcomes-house-of-lords-report-on-eu-opt-out-the-bar-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[barristers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has welcomed the finding of the House of Lords EU Committee that the Government has not made a convincing case to opt-out of about 130 EU police and criminal justice measures and that to do so would have significant negative repercussions for the UK&#8217;s internal [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has welcomed the finding of the House of Lords EU Committee that the Government has not made a convincing case to opt-out of about 130 EU police and criminal justice measures and that to do so would have significant negative repercussions for the UK&#8217;s internal security.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/media-centre/news-and-press-releases/2013/april/bar-council-welcomes-house-of-lords-report-on-eu-opt-out/">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Bar Council, 23rd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.barcouncil.org.uk">www.barcouncil.org.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/bar-council-welcomes-house-of-lords-report-on-eu-opt-out-the-bar-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast-track legislation preventing proper scrutiny, says rights committee &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/fast-track-legislation-preventing-proper-scrutiny-says-rights-committee-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/fast-track-legislation-preventing-proper-scrutiny-says-rights-committee-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[select committees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The increasing use emergency legislation, lack of adequate debating time and insertion of last-minute amendments are preventing effective parliamentary scrutiny of new laws, a committee has said.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 15th April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The increasing use emergency legislation, lack of adequate debating time and insertion of last-minute amendments are preventing effective parliamentary scrutiny of new laws, a committee has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/apr/15/fast-track-legislation-scutiny-committee">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 15th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/fast-track-legislation-preventing-proper-scrutiny-says-rights-committee-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complexity of parliamentary legislation &#8216;undermining the rule of law&#8217; &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/complexity-of-parliamentary-legislation-undermining-the-rule-of-law-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/complexity-of-parliamentary-legislation-undermining-the-rule-of-law-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule of law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Parliamentary legislation is excessively complex and its confusions undermine the rule of law, according to the official in charge of drafting government statutes.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Parliamentary legislation is excessively complex and its confusions undermine the rule of law, according to the official in charge of drafting government statutes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/apr/16/parliamentary-legislation-too-complex-report">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/complexity-of-parliamentary-legislation-undermining-the-rule-of-law-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blow to freedom of speech as key libel reform the Defamation Bill is blocked &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-the-inde/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-the-inde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government is to block plans to reform Britain’s &#8216;chilling&#8217; libel laws and to prevent large companies from silencing their critics with the threat of being sued.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 15th April 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government is to block plans to reform Britain’s &#8216;chilling&#8217; libel laws and to prevent large companies from silencing their critics with the threat of being sued.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-8574218.html">Full story</a> </p>
<p>The Independent, 15th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-the-inde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice and Security Bill: The “Secret Courts” Endgame? &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/justice-and-security-bill-the-secret-courts-endgame-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/justice-and-security-bill-the-secret-courts-endgame-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Today we will see the beginning of the end of the passage of the Justice and Security Bill through Parliament: the process commonly known as parliamentary &#8216;ping-pong&#8217;.&#8221; Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 26th March 2013 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Today we will see the beginning of the end of the passage of the  Justice and Security Bill through Parliament:  the process commonly known as parliamentary &#8216;ping-pong&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/26/justice-and-security-bill-the-secret-courts-endgame-angela-patrick/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 26th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/justice-and-security-bill-the-secret-courts-endgame-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lords to vote on restoring safeguards to plan for secret courts &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/lords-to-vote-on-restoring-safeguards-to-plan-for-secret-courts-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/lords-to-vote-on-restoring-safeguards-to-plan-for-secret-courts-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Peers vote on Tuesday on whether to restore extra safeguards to the justice and security bill – amendments that the government has warned will make the expansion of secret courts unworkable.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 26th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Peers vote on Tuesday on whether to restore extra safeguards to the justice and security bill – amendments that the government has warned will make the expansion of secret courts unworkable.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/mar/26/lords-vote-safeguards-secret-courts">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 26th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/lords-to-vote-on-restoring-safeguards-to-plan-for-secret-courts-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lords plan parliamentary &#8216;ping pong&#8217; to win battle over secret courts &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/lords-plan-parliamentary-ping-pong-to-win-battle-over-secret-courts-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/lords-plan-parliamentary-ping-pong-to-win-battle-over-secret-courts-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Peers intend to change justice and security bill as it shuttles between houses of parliament, government is warned.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 21st March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Peers intend to change justice and security bill as it shuttles between houses of parliament, government is warned.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/mar/21/lords-ping-pong-secret-courts">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/lords-plan-parliamentary-ping-pong-to-win-battle-over-secret-courts-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicians agree deal on post-Leveson Royal Charter for press regulation &#8211; but Daily Mail Group, News International and Telegraph Media Group refuse to sign up &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/politicians-agree-deal-on-post-leveson-royal-charter-for-press-regulation-but-daily-mail-group-news-international-and-telegraph-media-group-refuse-to-sign-up-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/politicians-agree-deal-on-post-leveson-royal-charter-for-press-regulation-but-daily-mail-group-news-international-and-telegraph-media-group-refuse-to-sign-up-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Britain’s largest newspaper groups are on a collision course with the Government over press regulation, after last night signalling their anger at the imposition of &#8216;several deeply contentious&#8217; issues in a Royal Charter announced in Parliament by the Prime Minister.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 19th March 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Britain’s largest newspaper groups are on a collision course with the Government over press regulation, after last night signalling their anger at the imposition of &#8216;several deeply contentious&#8217; issues in a Royal Charter announced in Parliament by the Prime Minister.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/politicians-agree-deal-on-postleveson-royal-charter-for-press-regulation--but-daily-mail-group-news-international-and-telegraph-media-group-refuse-to-sign-up-8539779.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 19th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/politicians-agree-deal-on-post-leveson-royal-charter-for-press-regulation-but-daily-mail-group-news-international-and-telegraph-media-group-refuse-to-sign-up-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jacob Rowbottom: Entrenching a Royal Charter – some initial thoughts &#8211; UK Constitutional Law Group</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/jacob-rowbottom-entrenching-a-royal-charter-some-initial-thoughts-uk-constitutional-law-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/jacob-rowbottom-entrenching-a-royal-charter-some-initial-thoughts-uk-constitutional-law-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;After much political manoeuvring over the weekend, a deal has been struck on the Royal Charter to implement Leveson. A key point is that it will prevent the Charter being unilaterally changed by future governments.&#8221; Full story UK Constitutional Law Group, 18th March 2013 Source: www.ukconstitutionallaw.org]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After much political manoeuvring over the weekend, a deal has been struck on the Royal Charter to implement Leveson. A key point is that it will prevent the Charter being unilaterally changed by future governments.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/03/18/jacob-rowbottom-entrenching-a-royal-charter-some-initial-thoughts/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Constitutional Law Group, 18th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukconstitutionallaw.org">www.ukconstitutionallaw.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/jacob-rowbottom-entrenching-a-royal-charter-some-initial-thoughts-uk-constitutional-law-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameron pulls the plug on press talks – and sets stage for fight &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/cameron-pulls-the-plug-on-press-talks-and-sets-stage-for-fight-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/cameron-pulls-the-plug-on-press-talks-and-sets-stage-for-fight-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;PM&#8217;s ejector-seat diplomacy over Leveson leaves him facing a complex parliamentary battle.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 14th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;PM&#8217;s ejector-seat diplomacy over Leveson leaves him facing a complex parliamentary battle.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/14/cameron-press-regulation-negotiations">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 14th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/cameron-pulls-the-plug-on-press-talks-and-sets-stage-for-fight-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caste discrimination should be outlawed, say Lords &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/caste-discrimination-should-be-outlawed-say-lords-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/caste-discrimination-should-be-outlawed-say-lords-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The House of Lords voted on Monday to outlaw discrimination against people on the basis of their caste.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 5th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The House of Lords voted on Monday to outlaw discrimination against people on the basis of their caste.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/mar/05/caste-discrimination-outlawed-lords">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 5th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/caste-discrimination-should-be-outlawed-say-lords-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret courts: Former top judge Lord Woolf backs government changes &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/secret-courts-former-top-judge-lord-woolf-backs-government-changes-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/secret-courts-former-top-judge-lord-woolf-backs-government-changes-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The former head of the judiciary, Lord Woolf, has thrown his support behind plans to allow more civil courts to examine secret intelligence in private.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 4th March 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The former head of the judiciary, Lord Woolf, has thrown his support behind plans to allow more civil courts to examine secret intelligence in private.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21653211">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 4th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/secret-courts-former-top-judge-lord-woolf-backs-government-changes-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peers compromise over press regulation &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/peers-compromise-over-press-regulation-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/peers-compromise-over-press-regulation-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Peers have staged a partial climbdown in their clash with the government over the introduction of Leveson-style controls on the press.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 26th February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Peers have staged a partial climbdown in their clash with the government over the introduction of Leveson-style controls on the press.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/26/peers-compromise-press-regulation-leveson">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 26th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/peers-compromise-over-press-regulation-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upper Tribunal issues further decision in Prince Charles’ letters saga &#8211; Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/upper-tribunal-issues-further-decision-in-prince-charles-letters-saga-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/upper-tribunal-issues-further-decision-in-prince-charles-letters-saga-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In the latest round of the legal and political boxing match that the Evans case has become, the Upper Tribunal (&#8216;UT&#8217;), chaired by Walker J, has decided that the government should release its &#8216;schedules and lists&#8217; of &#8216;advocacy correspondence&#8217; between Prince Charles and various government departments.&#8221; Full story Panopticon, 21st February 2013 Source: www.panopticonblog.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the latest round of the legal and political boxing match that the Evans case has become, the Upper Tribunal (&#8216;UT&#8217;), chaired by Walker J, has decided that the government should release its &#8216;schedules and lists&#8217; of &#8216;advocacy correspondence&#8217; between Prince Charles and various government departments.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com/2013/02/21/upper-tribunal-issues-further-decision-in-prince-charles-letters-saga/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Panopticon, 21st February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com">www.panopticonblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/upper-tribunal-issues-further-decision-in-prince-charles-letters-saga-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A human rights reality check for the Home Secretary &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/a-human-rights-reality-check-for-the-home-secretary-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/a-human-rights-reality-check-for-the-home-secretary-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministers' powers and duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Home Secretary, Theresa May, is no stranger to ill-founded outbursts concerning the evils of human rights. Against that background, her recent article in the Mail on Sunday (to which Adam Wager has already drawn attention) does not disappoint. May’s ire is drawn by certain recent judicial decisions in which the deportation of foreign criminals [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Home Secretary, Theresa May, is no stranger to ill-founded outbursts concerning the evils of human rights. Against that background, her recent article in the Mail on Sunday (to which Adam Wager has already drawn attention) does not disappoint. May’s ire is drawn by certain recent judicial decisions in which the deportation of foreign criminals has been ruled unlawful on the ground that it would breach their right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Some of these judgments, May contends, flout instructions issued to judges by Parliament about how such cases should be decided.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/02/18/a-human-rights-reality-check-for-the-home-secretary-dr-mark-elliott/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 18th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/a-human-rights-reality-check-for-the-home-secretary-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gerry McCann calls for press control laws – and 75% of the public agree &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/gerry-mccann-calls-for-press-control-laws-and-75-of-the-public-agree-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/gerry-mccann-calls-for-press-control-laws-and-75-of-the-public-agree-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Poll shows overwhelming support for missing Madeleine&#8217;s father on how Leveson inquiry findings must be enforced.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 9th February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Poll shows overwhelming support for missing Madeleine&#8217;s father on how Leveson inquiry findings must be enforced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/09/gerry-mccann-leveson-inquiry-press-control-laws">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 9th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/gerry-mccann-calls-for-press-control-laws-and-75-of-the-public-agree-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveson report: Lords unveil proposals in frustration at lack of progress &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/leveson-report-lords-unveil-proposals-in-frustration-at-lack-of-progress-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/leveson-report-lords-unveil-proposals-in-frustration-at-lack-of-progress-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Frustration in the Lords at the lack of progress over the Leveson report has led four peers to table measures to introduce a low-cost arbitration service for defamation, as recommended by Lord Justice Leveson in the defamation bill.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 4th February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Frustration in the Lords at the lack of progress over the Leveson report has led four peers to table measures to introduce a low-cost arbitration service for defamation, as recommended by Lord Justice Leveson in the defamation bill.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/04/leveson-report-lords-proposals-frustration">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 4th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/leveson-report-lords-unveil-proposals-in-frustration-at-lack-of-progress-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lobbyists&#8217; code of conduct bill to be debated for first time in parliament &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/lobbyists-code-of-conduct-bill-to-be-debated-for-first-time-in-parliament-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/lobbyists-code-of-conduct-bill-to-be-debated-for-first-time-in-parliament-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Lobbyists working in Westminster or local government would have to sign a public register and agree to a code of conduct under a bill being debated for the first time in parliament on Friday.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 1st February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lobbyists working in Westminster or local government would have to sign a public register and agree to a code of conduct under a bill being debated for the first time in parliament on Friday.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/01/lobbyists-code-conduct-bill-debated">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 1st February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/lobbyists-code-of-conduct-bill-to-be-debated-for-first-time-in-parliament-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banning drugs drives a &#8216;rising tide&#8217; of legal highs, peers warn &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/banning-drugs-drives-a-rising-tide-of-legal-highs-peers-warn-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/banning-drugs-drives-a-rising-tide-of-legal-highs-peers-warn-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug offences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The current classification system simply cannot keep up as a new legal high emerges every six days in the UK and young people share links to where they can be bought online and via their mobile phones, Baroness Meacher, chairwoman of the parliamentary inquiry into legal highs, said.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 14th January 2013 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The current classification system simply cannot keep up as a new legal high emerges every six days in the UK and young people share links to where they can be bought online and via their mobile phones, Baroness Meacher, chairwoman of the parliamentary inquiry into legal highs, said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9798702/Banning-drugs-drives-a-rising-tide-of-legal-highs-peers-warn.html">Full story </a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 14th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/banning-drugs-drives-a-rising-tide-of-legal-highs-peers-warn-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord Phillips to challenge government on Supreme Court admin appointments &#8211; The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/lord-phillips-to-challenge-government-on-supreme-court-admin-appointments-the-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/lord-phillips-to-challenge-government-on-supreme-court-admin-appointments-the-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial appointments commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The former president of the Supreme Court, Lord Phillips, will challenge the right of the government to appoint the court’s chief executive in a proposed amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill this week.&#8221; Full story The Lawyer, 17th December 2012 Source: www.thelawyer.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The former president of the Supreme Court, Lord Phillips, will challenge the right of the government to appoint the court’s chief executive in a proposed amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill this week.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/lord-phillips-to-challenge-government-on-supreme-court-admin-appointments/1016054.article">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Lawyer, 17th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com">www.thelawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/lord-phillips-to-challenge-government-on-supreme-court-admin-appointments-the-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baroness D&#8217;Souza &#8211; The Role of the House of Lords in the Parliamentary Process &#8211; UCL Constitution Unit</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/baroness-dsouza-the-role-of-the-house-of-lords-in-the-parliamentary-process-ucl-constitution-unit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/baroness-dsouza-the-role-of-the-house-of-lords-in-the-parliamentary-process-ucl-constitution-unit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Looking above and beyond current debates about the House of Lords&#8217; composition, Baroness D&#8217;Souza will discuss the Lords in terms of its place in the parliamentary process. Having now been in post for over a year, Baroness D&#8217;Souza will present her vision for the Lords&#8217; future, its contribution to the political system, changes to its [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Looking above and beyond current debates about the House of Lords&#8217; composition, Baroness D&#8217;Souza will discuss the Lords in terms of its place in the parliamentary process. Having now been in post for over a year, Baroness D&#8217;Souza will present her vision for the Lords&#8217; future, its contribution to the political system, changes to its working practices and the role of the Lord Speaker. She will also cover public perceptions of the Upper House and the importance of outreach.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/55521123">Video</a></p>
<p>UCL Constitution Unit, 14th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit">ww.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/baroness-dsouza-the-role-of-the-house-of-lords-in-the-parliamentary-process-ucl-constitution-unit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges take on ministers over supreme court &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/judges-take-on-ministers-over-supreme-court-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/judges-take-on-ministers-over-supreme-court-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The government is facing a clash with some of the country&#8217;s most senior judges who will this week attempt to force ministers to relinquish control of the running of the supreme court.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th December 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The government is facing a clash with some of the country&#8217;s most senior judges who will this week attempt to force ministers to relinquish control of the running of the supreme court.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/dec/16/judges-ministers-supreme-court">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/judges-take-on-ministers-over-supreme-court-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Labour MP Margaret Moran escapes jail and criminal conviction despite fiddling £53,000 of expenses from taxpayer &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/former-labour-mp-margaret-moran-escapes-jail-and-criminal-conviction-despite-fiddling-53000-of-expenses-from-taxpayer-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/former-labour-mp-margaret-moran-escapes-jail-and-criminal-conviction-despite-fiddling-53000-of-expenses-from-taxpayer-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The former Labour MP, Margaret Moran, has been given a two-year supervision and treatment order for fiddling her expenses in order to gain £53,000 she was not entitled to.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 14th December 2012 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The former Labour MP, Margaret Moran, has been given a two-year supervision and treatment order for fiddling her expenses in order to gain £53,000 she was not entitled to.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/former-labour-mp-margaret-moran-escapes-jail-and-criminal-conviction-despite-fiddling-53000-of-expenses-from-taxpayer-8414037.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 14th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/former-labour-mp-margaret-moran-escapes-jail-and-criminal-conviction-despite-fiddling-53000-of-expenses-from-taxpayer-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peers vote to remove law banning insulting language &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/peers-vote-to-remove-law-banning-insulting-language-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/peers-vote-to-remove-law-banning-insulting-language-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The House of Lords on Wednesday night voted to remove a law that criminalises the use of insulting language in Britain.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 12th December 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The House of Lords on Wednesday night voted to remove a law that criminalises the use of insulting language in Britain.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/12/peers-law-banning-insulting-language">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 12th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/peers-vote-to-remove-law-banning-insulting-language-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Snooper&#8217;s charter&#8217; faces rough ride through parliament &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/snoopers-charter-faces-rough-ride-through-parliament-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/snoopers-charter-faces-rough-ride-through-parliament-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigatory powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Civil liberties are said to have been the political glue that brought the two coalition parties together before the general election, and nothing joined them more strongly than their joint opposition to Labour&#8217;s &#8216;Big Brother&#8217; database.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 11th December 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Civil liberties are said to have been the political glue that brought the two coalition parties together before the general election, and nothing joined them more strongly than their joint opposition to Labour&#8217;s &#8216;Big Brother&#8217; database.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/dec/11/snoopers-charter-report">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 11th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/snoopers-charter-faces-rough-ride-through-parliament-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillsborough probe bill supported in House of Commons &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/hillsborough-probe-bill-supported-in-house-of-commons-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/hillsborough-probe-bill-supported-in-house-of-commons-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;New powers to help the investigation of police officers involved in the Hillsborough disaster have been approved by MPs in the Commons.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 5th December 2012 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;New powers to help the investigation of police officers involved in the Hillsborough disaster have been approved by MPs in the Commons.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-20614524">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 5th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/hillsborough-probe-bill-supported-in-house-of-commons-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Cameron statement in response to the Leveson Inquiry report &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/david-cameron-statement-in-response-to-the-leveson-inquiry-report-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/david-cameron-statement-in-response-to-the-leveson-inquiry-report-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Prime Minister delivered the statement to the House of Commons on the day that Leveson report was published.&#8221; Full statement The Guardian, 29th November 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Prime Minister delivered the statement to the House of Commons on the day that Leveson report was published.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/nov/29/leveson-inquiry-david-cameron-statement">Full statement</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 29th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/david-cameron-statement-in-response-to-the-leveson-inquiry-report-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveson report calls for new press law &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/leveson-report-calls-for-new-press-law-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/leveson-report-calls-for-new-press-law-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Lord Justice Leveson has recommended the introduction of the first press law in Britain since the 17th century – proposing that a statutory body such as Ofcom should take responsibility for monitoring an overhauled Press Complaints Commission.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 29th November 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk Related link: An inquiry into the culture, practices and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lord Justice Leveson has recommended the introduction of the first press law in Britain since the 17th century – proposing that a statutory body such as Ofcom should take responsibility for monitoring an overhauled Press Complaints Commission.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/nov/29/leveson-report-new-press-law">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 29th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
<p>Related link: <a href="http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc1213/hc07/0780/0780.asp">An inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press: report [Leveson]</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/leveson-report-calls-for-new-press-law-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveson: some of the key questions awaiting answers &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/leveson-some-of-the-key-questions-awaiting-answers-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/leveson-some-of-the-key-questions-awaiting-answers-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Lord Justice Leveson&#8217;s report is expected to cover much ground, and to set the stage for the next debate: what about the internet?&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 28th November 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lord Justice Leveson&#8217;s report is expected to cover much ground, and to set the stage for the next debate: what about the internet?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/nov/28/leveson-inquiry-margaretthatcher">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 28th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/leveson-some-of-the-key-questions-awaiting-answers-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret courts suffer humiliating defeat in House of Lords &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/secret-courts-suffer-humiliating-defeat-in-house-of-lords-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/secret-courts-suffer-humiliating-defeat-in-house-of-lords-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Peers delivered a series of humiliating defeats on Wednesday night to government plans to introduce secret courts.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 21st November 2012 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Peers delivered a series of humiliating defeats on Wednesday night to government plans to introduce secret courts.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9694776/Secret-courts-suffer-humiliating-defeat-in-House-of-Lords.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/secret-courts-suffer-humiliating-defeat-in-house-of-lords-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prisoner vote bill to be outlined &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/prisoner-vote-bill-to-be-outlined-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/prisoner-vote-bill-to-be-outlined-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The government&#8217;s draft bill on prisoner voting is to be outlined by the justice secretary on Thursday, the BBC understands.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 18th November 2012 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The government&#8217;s draft bill on prisoner voting is to be outlined by the justice secretary on Thursday, the BBC understands.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20381222">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 18th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/prisoner-vote-bill-to-be-outlined-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“No-one should be under any doubt – prisoners are not getting the vote under this government” &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/no-one-should-be-under-any-doubt-prisoners-are-not-getting-the-vote-under-this-government-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/no-one-should-be-under-any-doubt-prisoners-are-not-getting-the-vote-under-this-government-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It is being reported that Parliament will, after all, get the opportunity to decide whether the blanket ban on convicted prisoners being able to vote will be lifted. MPs could get three options to choose from, including removing the ban for prisoners serving six months or less and those serving four years or less. A [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is being reported that Parliament will, after all, get the opportunity to decide whether the blanket ban on convicted prisoners being able to vote will be lifted. MPs could get three options to choose from, including removing the ban for prisoners serving six months or less and those serving four years or less. A third option will be to maintain the status quo, with no convicted prisoners being able to vote.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/11/18/no-one-should-be-under-any-doubt-prisoners-are-not-getting-the-vote-under-this-government/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 18th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/no-one-should-be-under-any-doubt-prisoners-are-not-getting-the-vote-under-this-government-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crucial battle against UK &#8216;secret courts&#8217; begins in earnest &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/crucial-battle-against-uk-secret-courts-begins-in-earnest-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/crucial-battle-against-uk-secret-courts-begins-in-earnest-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The House of Lords on Monday is due to vote on one of the most contentious but important pieces of legislation to come before this parliament.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 14th November 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The House of Lords on Monday is due to vote on one of the most contentious but important pieces of legislation to come before this parliament.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/defence-and-security-blog/2012/nov/14/mi5-mi6-house-of-lords">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 14th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/crucial-battle-against-uk-secret-courts-begins-in-earnest-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaret Moran received £53,000 in bogus MP expenses, jury finds -The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/margaret-moran-received-53000-in-bogus-mp-expenses-jury-finds-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/margaret-moran-received-53000-in-bogus-mp-expenses-jury-finds-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supervision orders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Margaret Moran, former Labour MP for Luton South, received more than £53,000 in fraudulent expenses, a jury has found, despite her being mentally unfit to stand trial.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 13th November 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Margaret Moran, former Labour MP for Luton South, received more than £53,000 in fraudulent expenses, a jury has found, despite her being mentally unfit to stand trial.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/nov/13/margaret-moran-bogus-mp-expenses">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 13th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/margaret-moran-received-53000-in-bogus-mp-expenses-jury-finds-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peers scrap hundreds of ancient laws in minutes &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/peers-scrap-hundreds-of-ancient-laws-in-minutes-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/peers-scrap-hundreds-of-ancient-laws-in-minutes-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Peers took just minutes tonight to back the repeal of hundreds of outdated laws, stretching back over nearly 700 years.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 5th November 2012 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Peers took just minutes tonight to back the repeal of hundreds of outdated laws, stretching back over nearly 700 years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/peers-scrap-hundreds-of-ancient-laws-in-minutes-8282733.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 5th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/peers-scrap-hundreds-of-ancient-laws-in-minutes-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prisoners’ votes: what’s the government up to? And are they missing a trick? &#8211; Head of Legal</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/prisoners-votes-whats-the-government-up-to-and-are-they-missing-a-trick-head-of-legal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/prisoners-votes-whats-the-government-up-to-and-are-they-missing-a-trick-head-of-legal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It’s well known that the government faces a problem when it comes to prisoners’ votes.&#8221; Full story Head of Legal, 30th October 2012 Source: www.headoflegal.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s well known that the government faces a problem when it comes to prisoners’ votes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.headoflegal.com/2012/10/30/prisoners-votes-whats-government-up-to-missing-trick/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Head of Legal, 30th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.headoflegal.com">www.headoflegal.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/prisoners-votes-whats-the-government-up-to-and-are-they-missing-a-trick-head-of-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prisoner votes: Strasbourg should give way to national independence &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/prisoner-votes-strasbourg-should-give-way-to-national-independence-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/prisoner-votes-strasbourg-should-give-way-to-national-independence-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The constitutional crisis predicted for years by Professor Vernon Bogdanor is upon us. He warned that the human rights reforms of the 1990s created a potential conflict between the sovereignty of parliament and the rule of law. &#8216;What happens if there is a clash between the two principles?&#8217; he asked in his Magna Carta lecture [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The constitutional crisis predicted for years by Professor Vernon Bogdanor is upon us. He warned that the human rights reforms of the 1990s created a potential conflict between the sovereignty of parliament and the rule of law. &#8216;What happens if there is a clash between the two principles?&#8217; he asked in his Magna Carta lecture of 2006. A very senior judge to whom he had posed the conundrum had replied &#8216;That is a question that ought not to be asked.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/oct/29/prisoner-votes-strasbourg-national-independence">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 29th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/prisoner-votes-strasbourg-should-give-way-to-national-independence-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parliament and the judiciary &#8211; Speech by the Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC MP</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/parliament-and-the-judiciary-speech-by-the-attorney-general-dominic-grieve-qc-mp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/parliament-and-the-judiciary-speech-by-the-attorney-general-dominic-grieve-qc-mp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parliament and the judiciary Speech by the Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC MP BPP Law School, 25th October 2012 Source: www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Speeches/Pages/AttorneyGeneralSpeechtoBPPLawSchool.aspx">Parliament and the judiciary</a></p>
<p>Speech by the Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC MP</p>
<p>BPP Law School, 25th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk">www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/parliament-and-the-judiciary-speech-by-the-attorney-general-dominic-grieve-qc-mp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs reject government plans for pilot badger cull &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/mps-reject-government-plans-for-pilot-badger-cull-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/mps-reject-government-plans-for-pilot-badger-cull-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pilot schemes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;MPs have voted against the government&#8217;s policy of culling badgers in two pilot schemes in England.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 25th October 2012 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;MPs have voted against the government&#8217;s policy of culling badgers in two pilot schemes in England.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-20085441#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 25th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/mps-reject-government-plans-for-pilot-badger-cull-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boundary changes: Revised proposals for English constituencies &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/boundary-changes-revised-proposals-for-english-constituencies-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/boundary-changes-revised-proposals-for-english-constituencies-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Revised proposals have been published for the shape of future parliamentary boundaries in England.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 16th October 2012 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Revised proposals have been published for the shape of future parliamentary boundaries in England.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19960567#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 16th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/boundary-changes-revised-proposals-for-english-constituencies-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing scope of anti-piracy code would need Parliamentary and EU approval, says Ofcom &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/changing-scope-of-anti-piracy-code-would-need-parliamentary-and-eu-approval-says-ofcom-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/changing-scope-of-anti-piracy-code-would-need-parliamentary-and-eu-approval-says-ofcom-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Ofcom would have to consult on and gain Parliamentary and EU approval for any changes it wishes to make to the scope of its proposed new anti-piracy code once the initial code is finalised, it has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-Law.com, 4th October 2012 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ofcom would have to consult on and gain Parliamentary and EU approval for any changes it wishes to make to the scope of its proposed new anti-piracy code once the initial code is finalised, it has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/october/changing-scope-of-anti-piracy-code-would-need-parliamentary-and-eu-approval-says-ofcom/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-Law.com, 4th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/changing-scope-of-anti-piracy-code-would-need-parliamentary-and-eu-approval-says-ofcom-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright reforms needed now, but future &#8216;tweaking&#8217; without consultation must be avoided, says expert &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/copyright-reforms-needed-now-but-future-tweaking-without-consultation-must-be-avoided-says-expert-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/copyright-reforms-needed-now-but-future-tweaking-without-consultation-must-be-avoided-says-expert-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artistic works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government must reform UK copyright law in order to restore the public and business’s &#8216;respect&#8217; in the &#8216;integrity&#8217; of the framework, an expert has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 19th September 2012 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government must reform UK copyright law in order to restore the public and business’s &#8216;respect&#8217; in the &#8216;integrity&#8217; of the framework, an expert has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/september/copyright-reforms-needed-now-but-future-tweaking-without-consultation-must-be-avoided-says-expert/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 19th September 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/copyright-reforms-needed-now-but-future-tweaking-without-consultation-must-be-avoided-says-expert-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
