<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; national insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/national-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:34:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Government consults on new tax rules for UK workers employed through offshore intermediaries &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/government-consults-on-new-tax-rules-for-uk-workers-employed-through-offshore-intermediaries-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/government-consults-on-new-tax-rules-for-uk-workers-employed-through-offshore-intermediaries-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;New rules aimed at ensuring that businesses which employ UK-based workers through offshore structures pay the correct employment taxes have been published for consultation by the Government.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 31st May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;New rules aimed at ensuring that businesses which employ UK-based workers through offshore structures pay the correct employment taxes have been published for consultation by the Government.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/government-consults-on-new-tax-rules-for-uk-workers-employed-through-offshore-intermediaries/?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 31st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/government-consults-on-new-tax-rules-for-uk-workers-employed-through-offshore-intermediaries-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment tribunal to lose power to make wider recommendations in discrimination cases &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/employment-tribunal-to-lose-power-to-make-wider-recommendations-in-discrimination-cases-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/employment-tribunal-to-lose-power-to-make-wider-recommendations-in-discrimination-cases-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 10:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health & safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government is to remove the Employment Tribunal&#8217;s power to make recommendations to employers that go beyond the specifics of a particular discrimination claim, it has announced.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 10th May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government is to remove the Employment Tribunal&#8217;s power to make recommendations to employers that go beyond the specifics of a particular discrimination claim, it has announced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/employment-tribunal-to-lose-power-to-make-wider-recommendations-in-discrimination-cases/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 10th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/employment-tribunal-to-lose-power-to-make-wider-recommendations-in-discrimination-cases-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No sick pay, no maternity pay: Chancellor targets employers&#8217; tax loophole that damages teachers&#8217; and nurses&#8217; rights &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/no-sick-pay-no-maternity-pay-chancellor-targets-employers-tax-loophole-that-damages-teachers-and-nurses-rights-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/no-sick-pay-no-maternity-pay-chancellor-targets-employers-tax-loophole-that-damages-teachers-and-nurses-rights-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternity leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sick leave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A tax loophole which allows firms to dodge around £100 million a year in National Insurance will be closed in the Budget, it was announced.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 16th March 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A tax loophole which allows firms to dodge around £100 million a year in National Insurance will be closed in the Budget, it was announced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/no-sick-pay-no-maternity-pay-chancellor-targets-employers-tax-loophole-that-damages-teachers-and-nurses-rights-8537192.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 16th March 2013</p>
<p>Source:<a href="http:// www.independent.co.uk"> www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/no-sick-pay-no-maternity-pay-chancellor-targets-employers-tax-loophole-that-damages-teachers-and-nurses-rights-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flat-rate pensions plan revealed &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/flat-rate-pensions-plan-revealed-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/flat-rate-pensions-plan-revealed-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contracting out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Details of the government&#8217;s plans to introduce a flat-rate pension by 2017 &#8211; equivalent to £144 per week in today&#8217;s money &#8211; have emerged ahead of an official announcement next week.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 12th January 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Details of the government&#8217;s plans to introduce a flat-rate pension by 2017 &#8211; equivalent to £144 per week in today&#8217;s money &#8211; have emerged ahead of an official announcement next week.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20996912#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 12th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/flat-rate-pensions-plan-revealed-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Uncut makes high court challenge to Goldman Sachs tax deal &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/uk-uncut-makes-high-court-challenge-to-goldman-sachs-tax-deal-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/uk-uncut-makes-high-court-challenge-to-goldman-sachs-tax-deal-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=73923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A deal worth at least £10m between banking giant Goldman Sachs and the head of HM Revenue and Customs is set to be challenged in the high court on Wednesday by tax-avoidance campaign group, UK Uncut Legal Action.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 13th June 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A deal worth at least £10m between banking giant Goldman Sachs and the head of HM Revenue and Customs is set to be challenged in the high court on Wednesday by tax-avoidance campaign group, UK Uncut Legal Action.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/13/uk-uncut-challenge-goldman-sachs-tax">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 13th June 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/uk-uncut-makes-high-court-challenge-to-goldman-sachs-tax-deal-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cathie and another v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/cathie-and-another-v-secretary-of-state-for-business-innovation-and-skills-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/cathie-and-another-v-secretary-of-state-for-business-innovation-and-skills-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqualification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=73539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cathie and another v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWCA Civ 739; [2012] WLR (D) 168 &#8220;In the context of determining whether to disqualify a company director for misconduct in the direction of an insolvent company the use of the expression &#8216;exceptional circumstances&#8217; was better avoided. The expression &#8216;extenuating circumstances&#8217; was [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2012-168">Cathie and another v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWCA Civ 739; [2012] WLR (D) 168</a></p>
<p>&#8220;In the context of determining whether to disqualify a company director for misconduct in the direction of an insolvent company the use of the expression &#8216;exceptional circumstances&#8217; was better avoided. The expression &#8216;extenuating circumstances&#8217; was to be preferred, because the fact finder’s task was to consider the evidence as a whole, including extenuating circumstances, and to decide whether the director had fallen below the standards of probity and competence appropriate for persons fit to be company directors.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 1st June 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/cathie-and-another-v-secretary-of-state-for-business-innovation-and-skills-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Payments to funded unapproved retirement benefit schemes attract NI contributions as earnings, court says &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/payments-to-funded-unapproved-retirement-benefit-schemes-attract-ni-contributions-as-earnings-court-says-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/payments-to-funded-unapproved-retirement-benefit-schemes-attract-ni-contributions-as-earnings-court-says-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=73483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Payments made by an employer for the benefit of an employee into a funded unapproved retirement benefit scheme (FURBS) are classed as &#8216;earnings&#8217; on which the employer must pay national insurance contributions (NICs), the Court of Appeal has ruled.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 31st May 2012 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Payments made by an employer for the benefit of an employee into a funded unapproved retirement benefit scheme (FURBS) are classed as &#8216;earnings&#8217; on which the employer must pay national insurance contributions (NICs), the Court of Appeal has ruled.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/may/payments-to-funded-unapproved-retirement-benefit-schemes-attract-ni-contributions-as-earnings-court-says/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 31st May 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/payments-to-funded-unapproved-retirement-benefit-schemes-attract-ni-contributions-as-earnings-court-says-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue to appear in court over Goldman Sachs &#8216;sweetheart&#8217; deal &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/04/revenue-to-appear-in-court-over-goldman-sachs-sweetheart-deal-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/04/revenue-to-appear-in-court-over-goldman-sachs-sweetheart-deal-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Revenue & Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=70940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs will be forced to defend itself in court against allegations that it gave one of the world&#8217;s most profitable banks a sweetheart deal on the repayment of unpaid taxes worth up to £20m.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 18th April 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs will be forced to defend itself in court against allegations that it gave one of the world&#8217;s most profitable banks a sweetheart deal on the repayment of unpaid taxes worth up to £20m.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/apr/18/hmrc-goldmansachs">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 18th April 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/04/revenue-to-appear-in-court-over-goldman-sachs-sweetheart-deal-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mirrlees Review recommends &#8220;radical&#8221; tax reform &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/mirrlees-review-recommends-radical-tax-reform-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/mirrlees-review-recommends-radical-tax-reform-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stamp duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=58095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Stamp duty on property transactions is &#8216;inefficient and damaging&#8217; and should be abolished, while VAT should be levied on financial services business and income tax merged with national insurance, an independent report on taxation in the UK has claimed.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 14th September 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Stamp duty on property transactions is &#8216;inefficient and damaging&#8217; and should be abolished, while VAT should be levied on financial services business and income tax merged with national insurance, an independent report on taxation in the UK has claimed.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2011/september/mirrlees-review-recommends-radical-tax-reform/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 14th September 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/mirrlees-review-recommends-radical-tax-reform-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lump sum motoring expenses subject to NICs if not linked to mileage, tribunal says &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/lump-sum-motoring-expenses-subject-to-nics-if-not-linked-to-mileage-tribunal-says-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/lump-sum-motoring-expenses-subject-to-nics-if-not-linked-to-mileage-tribunal-says-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=57445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Employers will have to be more careful about how they pay their employees for motoring expenses after a tax tribunal ruling that lump-sum allowances could be subject to national insurance contributions (NICs).&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 1st September 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Employers will have to be more careful about how they pay their employees for motoring expenses after a tax tribunal ruling that lump-sum allowances could be subject to national insurance contributions (NICs).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2011/september/lump-sum-motoring-expenses-subject-to-nics-if-not-linked-to-mileage-tribunal-says/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 1st September 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/lump-sum-motoring-expenses-subject-to-nics-if-not-linked-to-mileage-tribunal-says-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning over national insurance and income tax merger plans &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/warning-over-national-insurance-and-income-tax-merger-plans-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/warning-over-national-insurance-and-income-tax-merger-plans-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=49414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Government plans to merge national insurance and income tax expected in this week&#8217;s budget could be &#8216;politically explosive&#8217; and create a new system of winners and losers, tax experts have warned.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 20th March 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government plans to merge national insurance and income tax expected in this week&#8217;s budget could be &#8216;politically explosive&#8217; and create a new system of winners and losers, tax experts have warned.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/mar/20/national-insurance-income-tax-merger-warning">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 20th March 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/warning-over-national-insurance-and-income-tax-merger-plans-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixed share partners are not employees, EAT rules &#8211; The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/11/fixed-share-partners-are-not-employees-eat-rules-the-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/11/fixed-share-partners-are-not-employees-eat-rules-the-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=43158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;An attempt to have fixed share partners legally defined as employees has failed at the Employment Appeal Tribunal.&#8221; Full story The Lawyer, 26th November 2010 Source: www.thelawyer.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;An attempt to have fixed share partners legally defined as employees has failed at the Employment Appeal Tribunal.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/fixed-share-partners-are-not-employees-eat-rules/1006232.article">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Lawyer, 26th November 2010</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com">www.thelawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/11/fixed-share-partners-are-not-employees-eat-rules-the-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Kearney &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/revenue-and-customs-commissioners-v-kearney-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/revenue-and-customs-commissioners-v-kearney-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=32241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Kearney [2010] EWCA Civ 288; [2010] WLR (D) 89 &#8220;To obtain an extension of time to pay Class 3 national insurance contributions a taxpayer had to show that his failure to make the payments on time was due to ignorance not caused by his own lack of care and diligence. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2010/CACiv/Revenue_&amp;_Customs_v_Kearney.htm">Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Kearney [2010] EWCA Civ 288; [2010] WLR (D) 89</a></p>
<p>&#8220;To obtain an extension of time to pay Class 3 national insurance contributions a taxpayer had to show that his failure to make the payments on time was due to ignorance not caused by his own lack of care and diligence. All relevant circumstances were factors to be balanced together to assess or evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether due care and diligence had been exercised, and if not, whether that failure had been the cause of the contributor’s ignorance of his obligation to pay the contributions.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 24th March 2010</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk">www.lawreports.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/revenue-and-customs-commissioners-v-kearney-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Insurance Contributions Act</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/07/national-insurance-contributuions-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/07/national-insurance-contributuions-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=8390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Insurance Contributions Act published Full text of Act (PDF) Source: www.opsi.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Insurance Contributions Act published</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/pdf/ukpga_20080016_en.pdf">Full text of Act</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk">www.opsi.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/07/national-insurance-contributuions-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anger as pension reform rejected &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/12/anger-as-pension-reform-rejected-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/12/anger-as-pension-reform-rejected-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[national insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/12/21/anger-as-pension-reform-rejected-bbc-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The government has rejected a plan to let women boost their state pensions by buying up to nine years&#8217; worth of extra National Insurance (NI) contributions.&#8221; Full story  BBC News, 20th December 2007 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The government has rejected a plan to let women boost their state pensions by buying up to nine years&#8217; worth of extra National Insurance (NI) contributions.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7153401.stm">Full story </a></p>
<p>BBC News, 20th December 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/12/anger-as-pension-reform-rejected-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
