What the Ashley Madison case highlights about jurisdiction in data protection cases – OUT-LAW.com

Posted August 26th, 2015 in data protection, EC law, internet, jurisdiction, news by sally

‘FOCUS: The Ashley Madison data breach case highlights the unsatisfactory lack of clarity that exists over which data protection laws apply to businesses that operate across the world.’

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 24th August 2015

Source: www.out-law.com

Comments Off on What the Ashley Madison case highlights about jurisdiction in data protection cases – OUT-LAW.com

Merton London Borough Council v B (Central Authority of the Republic of Latvia, intervening) – WLR Daily

Merton London Borough Council v B (Central Authority of the Republic of Latvia, intervening) [2015] EWCA Civ 888; [2015] WLR (D) 365

‘Notwithstanding that concerns might be expressed in many parts of Europe about the law and practice in England and Wales in relation to non-consensual adoption where care proceedings involving foreign nationals were in contemplation, domestic law was not incompatible with the United Kingdom’s international obligations or, specifically, its obligations under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.’

WLR Daily, 6th August 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Merton London Borough Council v B (Central Authority of the Republic of Latvia, intervening) – WLR Daily

Surrogacy in the UK vs Surrogacy Abroad – entirely different, or one and the same? – Family Law Week

Posted August 12th, 2015 in consent, jurisdiction, news, surrogacy by sally

‘Nicola Scott, fertility lawyer at Porter Dodson LLP, considers those issues that often arise in UK surrogacy arrangements.’
Full story

Family Law Week, 4th August 2015

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

Comments Off on Surrogacy in the UK vs Surrogacy Abroad – entirely different, or one and the same? – Family Law Week

Saga delayed: A report on the continuing West Tankers saga – No. 5 Chambers

Posted July 27th, 2015 in arbitration, EC law, injunctions, jurisdiction, news by sally

‘The injustice of delay is a “long standing principle of the common law” (Moore v SSCLG [2015] EWHC44 (Admin)), at least from Magna Carta’s “… we will not… defer… Justice or Right”. ECHRs’ Art6(1) begins “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations… everyone is entitled to a… hearing within a reasonable time…” The ECJ’s West Tankers judgment seems to depart from this.’

Full story

No. 5 Chambers, 6th July 2015

Source: www.no5.com

Comments Off on Saga delayed: A report on the continuing West Tankers saga – No. 5 Chambers

A key new case on jurisdiction where an accident happens abroad during a holiday booked from the UK: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated [2015] EWCA Civ 665 – Henderson Chambers

‘In a wide-ranging decision earlier this month, the Court of Appeal has clarified a number of key questions on jurisdiction where an accident happens abroad during a holiday booked from UK. Most significantly, Arden LJ (giving the leading judgment) held that direct damage in the jurisdiction is required to come within the tort jurisdictional gateway in the CPR, effectively overruling earlier first instance decisions that indirect or consequential damage was sufficient. While this would prevent many overseas accidents from being litigated in the UK, Arden LJ did carve out an exception for Fatal Accident Act claims, which she considered involved “direct damage” in the UK. She also took the opportunity to provide her own “gloss” on the so-called “Canada Trust gloss”. Peppered throughout the judgment are some blistering but instructive observations on defective witness statements.’

Full story

Henderson Chambers, 24th July 2015

Source: www.hendersonchambers.co.uk

Comments Off on A key new case on jurisdiction where an accident happens abroad during a holiday booked from the UK: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated [2015] EWCA Civ 665 – Henderson Chambers

Insolvency–when can secondary proceedings in other member states be opened? – 11 Stone Buildings

Posted July 25th, 2015 in EC law, insolvency, jurisdiction, news, subsidiary companies by sally

‘Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: Discussing the European Court of Justice’s (ECJ) judgment in Comité d’entreprise de Nortel Networks SA, John Jessup of 11 Stone Buildings says the significant point to be taken from this case is that those who plan to open, or have opened, main insolvency proceedings can do little to prevent secondary proceedings being opened in another member state.’

Full story (PDF)

11 Stone Buildings, July 2015

Source: www.11sb.com

Comments Off on Insolvency–when can secondary proceedings in other member states be opened? – 11 Stone Buildings

Court of Appeal comments on deprivation of liberty and being party to proceedings – Local Government Lawyer

‘The Court of Appeal has held that it did not have jurisdiction to determine appeals against the President of the Court of Protection’s Re X rulings in which he sought to streamline procedures for dealing with certain types of deprivation of liberty cases.’

Full story

Local Government Lawyer, 16th June 2015

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Comments Off on Court of Appeal comments on deprivation of liberty and being party to proceedings – Local Government Lawyer

Stress-testing Schedule 3: cross-border placements and the Court of Protection

‘In Re PA, PB and PC [2015] EWCOP 38, Baker J has conducted a detailed analysis of the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection to recognise and enforce foreign protective measures under Schedule 3 to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005. That Schedule represents the implementation in English law of obligations contained within the 2000 Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults (the Convention) (which the United Kingdom has ratified in respect of Scotland, but not England).’

Full story

Halsbury’s Law Exchange, 9th June 2015

Source: www.halsburyslawechange.co.uk

Comments Off on Stress-testing Schedule 3: cross-border placements and the Court of Protection

The Conservative Party’s Proposals for human rights – John Wadham – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted June 3rd, 2015 in consultations, human rights, jurisdiction, news, political parties by sally

‘End the ability of the European Court of Human Rights to force the UK to change the law. Every judgement that UK law is incompatible with the Convention will be treated as advisory and we will introduce a new Parliamentary procedure to formally consider the judgement.’

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 2nd June 2015

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Comments Off on The Conservative Party’s Proposals for human rights – John Wadham – UK Human Rights Blog

Patel v Mussa – WLR Daily

Posted May 11th, 2015 in appeals, county courts, human rights, jurisdiction, law reports by sally

Patel v Mussa [2015] EWCA Civ 434; [2015] WLR (D) 195

‘There was no justification for extending the residual appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to encompass decisions of the county court which were alleged to breach article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms since appropriate forms of procedure existed by which a suitable remedy could be obtained.’

WLR Daily, 29th April 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Patel v Mussa – WLR Daily

Al-Saadoon and others v Secretary of State for Defence – WLR Daily

Al-Saadoon and others v Secretary of State for Defence [2015] EWHC 715 (Admin); [2015] WLR (D) 168

‘Individuals in certain test cases who had been shot by British forces in Iraq were within the United Kingdom’s jurisdiction, for the purposes of article 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, because they had been shot in the course of security operations in which British forces were exercising public powers normally exercised by the Iraqi government and because shooting someone involved the exercise of physical power over that person.

WLR Daily, 17th March 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Al-Saadoon and others v Secretary of State for Defence – WLR Daily

Christofi v National Bank of Greece (Cyprus) Ltd – WLR Daily

Christofi v National Bank of Greece (Cyprus) Ltd [2015] EWHC 986 (QB); [2015] WLR (D) 170

‘There was no general power to extend the mandatory two-month time limit for an appeal against the registration of a settlement order by a party not domiciled within the jurisdiction under article 43(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.’

WLR Daily, 14th April 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Christofi v National Bank of Greece (Cyprus) Ltd – WLR Daily

News focus: law and justice pledges – Law Society’s Gazette

‘The general election manifestos are in – here’s our quick-fire summary of their headline pledges on law and justice.’

Full story

Law Society’s Gazette, 20th April 2015

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Comments Off on News focus: law and justice pledges – Law Society’s Gazette

TV ‘exposure’ of Scientology halted by UK libel law split – The Guardian

‘Plans to broadcast HBO’s Church of Scientology exposé, Going Clear, have been shelved by Sky Atlantic in a virtual repeat of events two years ago, when UK publishers abandoned publication of the book on which the hard-hitting new TV documentary is based.’

Full story

The Guardian, 18th April 2015

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Comments Off on TV ‘exposure’ of Scientology halted by UK libel law split – The Guardian

Ariadne’s Golden Thread: Placing Children in Secure Accommodation – Family Law Week

Posted April 10th, 2015 in care orders, children, jurisdiction, news by tracey

‘Alex Laing, pupil at Coram Chambers, provides a step-by-step guide through the secure accommodation labyrinth when determining whether to use section 25 of the Children Act 1989 or the inherent jurisdiction.’

Full story

Family Law Week, 9th April 2015

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

Comments Off on Ariadne’s Golden Thread: Placing Children in Secure Accommodation – Family Law Week

Daedalus’s Twist? Secure Accommodation after a Child’s 16th Birthday – Family Law Week

Posted April 10th, 2015 in care orders, children, jurisdiction, news by tracey

‘Alex Laing, pupil at Coram Chambers, examines whether, and if so on what basis, the court can place in secure accommodation a child who has celebrated his 16th birthday.’

Full story

Family Law Week, 9th April 2015

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

Comments Off on Daedalus’s Twist? Secure Accommodation after a Child’s 16th Birthday – Family Law Week

Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Information Commissioner intervening) – WLR Daily

Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Information Commissioner intervening) [2015] EWCA Civ 311; [2015] WLR (D) 156

‘A claim for misuse of private information should be categorised as a tort for the purposes of service of proceedings out of the jurisdiction.’

WLR Daily, 18th March 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Information Commissioner intervening) – WLR Daily

Stranded Spouses and Immigration Control – Family Law Week

‘Sulema Jahangir, solicitor with Dawson Cornwell, explains the plight of wives and mothers who are stranded in foreign countries, often separated from their children, and unable to return to England because of immigration restrictions.’

Full story

Family Law Week, 31st March 2015

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

Comments Off on Stranded Spouses and Immigration Control – Family Law Week

The Cat’s Out of the Bag: legal advice privilege and the risks of being caught with a divorce lawyer – Family Law Week

‘Samuel Littlejohns, pupil at 1 Hare Court, examines whether the very fact that a party consulted a lawyer at a given time is privileged information, and the practical consequences of this for practitioners.’

Full story

Family Law Week, 27th March 2015

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

Comments Off on The Cat’s Out of the Bag: legal advice privilege and the risks of being caught with a divorce lawyer – Family Law Week

Google’s misuse of private browsing data entitles individuals to damages – Court of Appeal – UK Human Rights Blog

‘This case concerned the misuse of private information by an internet provider based in the United States. Google had secretly tracked private information about users’ internet browsing without their knowledge or consent, and then handed the information on to third parties (a practice known as supplying Browser-Generated Information, or ‘BGI’).’

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 31st March 2015

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Comments Off on Google’s misuse of private browsing data entitles individuals to damages – Court of Appeal – UK Human Rights Blog