Court discretion and dispute resolution clauses – Law Society’s Gazette

‘In Lancashire Schools SPC Phase 2 Ltd v Lendlease Construction (Europe) Ltd and others [2024] EWHC 37 (TCC), the Technology and Construction Court considered whether a dispute resolution clause (DR clause) which required the parties to engage with adjudication before proceeding to litigation, ousted the jurisdiction of the court.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 2nd February 2024

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

“Sufficient interest” in faculty petitions – II – Law & Religion UK

Posted January 25th, 2024 in ecclesiastical law, faculties, jurisdiction, news by sally

‘Re St. Nicholas Leicester [2023] ECC Lei 3 is the third consideration of an on-going faculty application for the introduction of a new altar frontal in the form of a Progress Pride image with a white cross applied to it. Two potential designs have been provided and the petitioners are seeking to have permission for the frontal to be displayed during Sunday worship and on Saturdays when the church is open to the public, Re St. Nicholas Leicester [2023] ECC Lei 1 (28 January 2023).’

Full Story

Law & Religion UK, 25th January 2024

Source: lawandreligionuk.com

Reassurances, Assurances or Uncertainties? – Hailsham Chambers

Posted November 15th, 2023 in appeals, chambers articles, insurance, jurisdiction, news by sally

‘In this case note Simon Howarth KC discusses the CoA’s review of R (Assurant) V FOS [2023] EWCA Civ 1049 and the jurisdiction issues that arose as a result.’

Full Story

Hailsham Chambers, 5th October 2023

Source: www.hailshamchambers.com

Court of Appeal adds additional hurdle to pension trustees recouping payments – OUT-LAW.com

Posted November 13th, 2023 in appeals, courts, enforcement, jurisdiction, local government, news, ombudsmen, pensions by tracey

‘Pension trustees in the UK will have to take an extra step to recover a disputed overpayment, as the English Court of Appeal has recently ruled that the Pensions Ombudsman (PO) is not a “competent court” for such purpose.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 10th November 2023

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

The Pensions Ombudsman – competent but not a court – Pensions Barrister

Posted November 9th, 2023 in appeals, chambers articles, courts, jurisdiction, news, ombudsmen, pensions by sally

‘The trustees of a pension scheme discover that members have been mistakenly overpaid: perhaps because the trustees misinterpreted the scheme rules, or perhaps because certain provisions of the scheme rules that were assumed to be valid were in fact invalid. The trustees decide to recoup the overpayments by setting them off against members’ instalments of future pension. A member raises a dispute, either as to the amount to be recouped or the rate of deduction.’

Full Story

Pensions Barrister, 9th November 2023

Source: www.pensionsbarrister.com

Pub murder conviction quashed over procedural error – BBC News

Posted October 25th, 2023 in appeals, Crown Court, imprisonment, jurisdiction, murder, news, sentencing by sally

‘A man who was jailed for murdering another man outside a pub has had his conviction quashed because of a procedural error.’

Full Story

BBC News, 25th October 2023

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Forced marriage and the inherent jurisdiction – Local Government Lawyer

‘The Court of Appeal recently considered the use of the inherent jurisdiction in a forced marriage case. Rhys Hadden analyses the ruling.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 15th September 2023

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Court of Appeal hands down judgment in the Trucks Collective Proceedings: Conflicts of Interest, Rival CPO Applications, and Jurisdiction to Appeal – Henderson Chambers

‘On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in UK Trucks Claim Limited v Stellantis NV (formerly Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV) & Others [2023] EWCA Civ 875. The appeal raised important issues in the continued development of the collective proceedings regime, including as to how conflicts of interest within a class might be addressed, the willingness of the Court of Appeal to interfere with the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (“CAT”) assessment of two rival applications for a collective proceedings order (“CPO”), and the scope of the statutory jurisdiction to appeal. The judgment is accessible here.’

Full Story

Henderson Chambers, 28th July 2023

Source: www.hendersonchambers.co.uk

Coronial powers and the rights of the unborn (Part 1) – UK Human Rights Blog

‘In this two-part article, Maya Sikand KC, Tom Stoate, and Ruby Peacock, explore two difficult questions arising from the inquest into the “harrowing circumstances” of the death of a baby, Aisha Cleary, at HMP Bronzefield. This first part seeks to answer the question: should coroners have jurisdiction to investigate stillbirths?’

Full Story

UK Human Rights Blog, 11th August 2023

Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com

Court of Appeal hands down judgment in the FX Collective Proceedings – Jurisdiction to Appeal, Opt-in vs Opt-out, and Carriage – Henderson Chambers

Posted August 3rd, 2023 in appeals, carriage of goods, chambers articles, competition, jurisdiction, news by sally

‘On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Evans v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 876, widely known as ‘the FX collective proceedings’. The judgment was handed down on the same day as the Court’s judgment in UK Trucks Claim Limited v Stellantis NV (formerly Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV) & Others [2023] EWCA Civ 875. Both judgments provide welcome additional clarity on matters of certification, and the FX judgment in particular provides useful guidance on (i) the statutory jurisdiction to appeal under section 49(1A) of the Competition Act 1998, (ii) the assessment of whether proceedings should be brought on an opt-in or an opt-out basis, and (iii) and the determination of carriage disputes.’

Full Story

Henderson Chambers, 28th July 2023

Source: www.hendersonchambers.co.uk

Strasbourg ‘had no jurisdiction’ to block Rwanda flight – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted June 6th, 2023 in airlines, asylum, deportation, human rights, jurisdiction, news, Rwanda by sally

‘Interim measures by the European Court of Human Rights including the one stopping deportation flights to Rwanda are not binding on governments, human rights law experts claim in a report published by a centre-right thinktank today. Rule 39 and the Rule of Law, published by Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, concludes that the Strasbourg court’s “rule 39” procedure was never approved by member states and that the government should challenge its lawfulness “robustly”.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 5th June 2023

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

High Court Considers Cart JR Ouster Clause – EIN Blog

‘Oceana, R (On the Application Of) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration And Asylum Chamber) [2023] EWHC 791 (Admin) is a High Court judgment on a preliminary issue as to jurisdiction in a claim for judicial review; essentially a ‘Cart JR’ following the partial ouster of the High Court’s ‘Cart’ jurisdiction by the coming into force of section 2 of the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 on 14 July 2022.’

Full Story

EIN Blog, 9th May 2023

Source: www.ein.org.uk

Can an adult child seek maintenance from their parents? – Family Law

‘There have recently been two cases in which adult children have begun court proceedings seeking a formal court order to force their parents into providing ongoing financial support to them.’

Full Story

Family Law, 12th April 2023

Source: www.familylaw.co.uk

The English courts found to have jurisdiction where an alternative forum was available – Mills & Reeve

Posted April 5th, 2023 in chambers articles, dispute resolution, fraud, insolvency, jurisdiction, news by sally

‘In a complex piece of litigation in which international fraud is alleged, four defendants contested the jurisdiction of the English courts to hear the claims and the associated insolvency applications. Applying the two-stage test in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987], the Court dismissed the applications.’

Full Story

Mills & Reeve, 3rd April 2023

Source: www.mills-reeve.com

R (Milburn) v Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman – St John’s Buildings

‘In R (Milburn) v Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman [2023] EWCA Civ 207, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of HHJ Sephton KC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) that the Claimant’s complaints regarding the local authority’s conduct in an appeal before the First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) well within the remit of the Tribunal, and therefore fell outside of the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction due to s.26(6) of the Local Government Act 1974.’

Full Story

St John's Buildings, 15th March 2023

Source: stjohnsbuildings.com

Jurisdiction and choice of law clauses in international contracts – OUT-LAW.com

‘All commercial contracts contain a number of “boilerplate” clauses, which are often seen as standard add-ons to the main terms and conditions of the contract.
One such boilerplate clause relates to jurisdiction and choice of law, and although these can be relatively straightforward when both parties are based in the same jurisdiction, they deserve proper consideration – particularly when the parties to the contract are based in different jurisdictions.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 27th October 2022

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

Re S: A short lesson on jurisdiction in international children cases post-Brexit – Family Law

Posted July 22nd, 2022 in brexit, children, families, family courts, jurisdiction, kidnapping, news by tracey

‘The President of the Family Division has very recently handed down his decision in this matter of Re: S (A Child) (Jurisdiction) [2022] EWHC 1720 (Fam), in which we acted for the successful applicant mother. Whilst the facts of the case are unique, the judgment serves as a helpful reminder of the jurisdictional framework of international children cases following our departure from the European Union.’

Full Story

Family Law, 21st July 2022

Source: www.familylaw.co.uk

Adjudicator reaches decision in “procedurally unjust manner” so not enforced – Practical Law: Construction Blog

‘Sometimes it feels that, as an adjudicator, you are damned if you do and are also damned if you don’t. In this case – Liverpool CC v Vital Infrastructure Asset Management (Viam) Ltd (In Administration) – it was both what the adjudicator did do and what he didn’t do that led the judge to issue a declaration that his decision was unenforceable. But how did the judge, HHJ Stephen Davies, arrive at this point?’

Full Story

Practical Law: Construction Blog, 21st June 2022

Source: constructionblog.practicallaw.com

Barrister given green light to pursue outstanding fees claim – Legal Futures

Posted May 16th, 2022 in barristers, fees, jurisdiction, law firms, news by tracey

‘The High Court has rejected an Italian law firm’s bid to stay a barrister’s claim for outstanding fees because of an action it took against him in its home country.’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 16th May 2022

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Children law cases and parents with learning disabilities – Local Government Lawyer

‘Eleanor Suthern reports on a recent Family Court ruling where a judge considered the international elements of the case and also gave guidance on proceedings involving a parent with a learning disability.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 29th April 2022

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk