<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; judgments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/judgments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>When Can Judges Change Their Minds? The Supreme Court’s judgment in L and B (Children) &#8211; Family Law Week</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/when-can-judges-change-their-minds-the-supreme-courts-judgment-in-l-and-b-children-family-law-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/when-can-judges-change-their-minds-the-supreme-courts-judgment-in-l-and-b-children-family-law-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Martha Gray, Pupil at 1 Garden Court, considers whether and in what circumstances a judge who has announced her decision is entitled to change her mind, particularly in the context of fact-finding hearings in care proceedings, in the light of the Supreme Court’s recent judgment.&#8221; Full story Family Law Week, 22nd February 2013 Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Martha Gray, Pupil at 1 Garden Court, considers whether and in what circumstances a judge who has announced her decision is entitled to change her mind, particularly in the context of fact-finding hearings in care proceedings, in the light of the Supreme Court’s recent judgment.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed112000">Full story</a></p>
<p>Family Law Week, 22nd February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.familylawweek.co.uk">www.familylawweek.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/when-can-judges-change-their-minds-the-supreme-courts-judgment-in-l-and-b-children-family-law-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re L and another (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/in-re-l-and-another-children-preliminary-finding-power-to-reverse-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/in-re-l-and-another-children-preliminary-finding-power-to-reverse-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re L and another (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] WLR (D) 69 &#8220;Contrary to the practice previously adopted, a judge’s power to reverse his or her decision at any time before the court order had been sealed was not reserved for exceptional circumstances. A carefully considered change of mind [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-069">In re L and another (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) [2013] UKSC 8;  [2013] WLR (D)  69</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Contrary to the practice previously adopted, a judge’s power to reverse his or her decision at any time before the court order had been sealed was not reserved for exceptional circumstances. A carefully considered change of mind by the judge was permisssible in the interests of the overriding objective of dealing with a case justly.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 20th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/in-re-l-and-another-children-preliminary-finding-power-to-reverse-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the matter of L and B (Children) &#8211; Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/in-the-matter-of-l-and-b-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/in-the-matter-of-l-and-b-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the matter of L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 8 &#124; UKSC 2012/0263 (YouTube) Supreme Court, 20th February 2013 Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSgJrUFdvr8&#038;feature=youtube_gdata">In the matter of L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 8 | UKSC 2012/0263</a> (YouTube)</p>
<p>Supreme Court, 20th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt">www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/in-the-matter-of-l-and-b-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enforcement of foreign insolvency judgments  in England and Wales ~ Rubin, New Cap and beyond &#8211; 11 Stone Buildings</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/enforcement-of-foreign-insolvency-judgments-in-england-and-wales-rubin-new-cap-and-beyond-11-stone-buildings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/enforcement-of-foreign-insolvency-judgments-in-england-and-wales-rubin-new-cap-and-beyond-11-stone-buildings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;After the euphoria engendered by the Court of Appeal judgments in Rubin v Eurofinance SA and New Cap Reinsurance v Grant, the longawaited judgment of the Supreme Court which was handed down on 23 October 2012, has left the insolvency profession scratching its collective head. Lexa Hilliard QC takes a closer look at the judgment [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After the euphoria engendered by the Court of Appeal judgments in Rubin v Eurofinance SA and New Cap Reinsurance v Grant, the longawaited judgment of the Supreme Court which was handed down on 23 October 2012, has left the insolvency profession scratching its collective head. Lexa Hilliard QC takes a closer look at the judgment and explains why its reasoning is not entirely convincing.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.11sb.com/pdf/insider-enforcement-foreign-judgments-jan-2013.pdf">Full story</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>11 Stone Buildings, January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.11sb.com">www.11sb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/enforcement-of-foreign-insolvency-judgments-in-england-and-wales-rubin-new-cap-and-beyond-11-stone-buildings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The supreme court&#8217;s YouTube channel is a welcome step for open justice &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/the-supreme-courts-youtube-channel-is-a-welcome-step-for-open-justice-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/the-supreme-courts-youtube-channel-is-a-welcome-step-for-open-justice-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video recordings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Judgment summaries are a good start, but it would be useful to watch recordings of full hearings. Do you agree?&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 21st January 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Judgment summaries are a good start, but it would be useful to watch recordings of full hearings. Do you agree?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jan/21/supreme-court-youtube-open-justice">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/the-supreme-courts-youtube-channel-is-a-welcome-step-for-open-justice-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christians and working on Sundays: what the tribunal really said &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/christians-and-working-on-sundays-what-the-tribunal-really-said-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/christians-and-working-on-sundays-what-the-tribunal-really-said-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Written rulings should be published when tribunals give judgments in order to properly inform public debate.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 10th Janaury 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Written rulings should be published when tribunals give judgments in order to properly inform public debate.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jan/10/employment-tribunal-christians-working-sundays">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 10th Janaury 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/christians-and-working-on-sundays-what-the-tribunal-really-said-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abbey Forwarding Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Hone and others &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/abbey-forwarding-ltd-in-liquidation-and-another-v-hone-and-others-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/abbey-forwarding-ltd-in-liquidation-and-another-v-hone-and-others-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abbey Forwarding Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Hone and others: [2012] EWHC 3525 (Ch);   [2012] WLR (D)  375 &#8220;There was no general bar in principle to the award of general damages for emotional distress where a freezing order was wrongly obtained but any such award would be sensitive to the facts of a particular [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2012-375">Abbey Forwarding Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Hone and others: [2012] EWHC 3525 (Ch);   [2012] WLR (D)  375</a></p>
<p>&#8220;There was no general bar in principle to the award of general damages for emotional distress where a freezing order was wrongly obtained but any such award would be sensitive to the facts of a particular case.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 11th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/abbey-forwarding-ltd-in-liquidation-and-another-v-hone-and-others-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Academics: Forgotten Players or Interlopers? &#8211; The Hon. Mr Justice Beatson</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/legal-academics-forgotten-players-or-interlopers-the-hon-mr-justice-beatson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/legal-academics-forgotten-players-or-interlopers-the-hon-mr-justice-beatson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lectures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legal Academics: Forgotten Players or Interlopers? (PDF) The Hon. Mr Justice Beatson Inner Temple Reader&#8217;s Lecture Series, November 2012 Source: www.innertemple.org.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.innertemple.org.uk/downloads/education/lectures/lecture_beatson.pdf">Legal Academics: Forgotten Players or Interlopers?</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>The Hon. Mr Justice Beatson</p>
<p>Inner Temple Reader&#8217;s Lecture Series, November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.innertemple.org.uk">www.innertemple.org.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/legal-academics-forgotten-players-or-interlopers-the-hon-mr-justice-beatson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Admission of hearsay evidence: the six principle questions &#8211; Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/admission-of-hearsay-evidence-the-six-principle-questions-halsburys-law-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/admission-of-hearsay-evidence-the-six-principle-questions-halsburys-law-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearsay evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In R v Riat the Court of Appeal provided valuable guidance concerning the approach that the domestic courts should adopt when hearsay evidence is tendered in criminal proceedings.&#8221; Full story Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange, 26th November 2012 Source: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In R v Riat the Court of Appeal provided valuable guidance concerning the approach that the domestic courts should adopt when hearsay evidence is tendered in criminal proceedings.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/admission-of-hearsay-evidence-the-six-principle-questions/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange, 26th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk">www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/admission-of-hearsay-evidence-the-six-principle-questions-halsburys-law-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Judgment – No Justice &#8211; Lord Neuberger</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/no-judgment-no-justice-lord-neuberger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/no-judgment-no-justice-lord-neuberger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Judgment – No Justice (PDF) Lord Neuberger The First Annual BAILII Lecture, 20th November 2012 Source: www.supremecourt.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk/docs/speech-121120.pdf">No Judgment – No Justice</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Lord Neuberger</p>
<p>The First Annual BAILII Lecture, 20th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk">www.supremecourt.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/no-judgment-no-justice-lord-neuberger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dissenting voices in Rahmatullah: no time for political sensitivities &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/the-dissenting-voices-in-rahmatullah-no-time-for-political-sensitivities-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/the-dissenting-voices-in-rahmatullah-no-time-for-political-sensitivities-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habeas corpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Only a few weeks after giving the Birkenhead lecture entitled &#8216;Dissenting judgments – self indulgence or self sacrifice?&#8217; (See David Hart QC’s previous post), Lord Kerr delivered the leading judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Rahmatullah. Given that the issue of a man’s liberty was at stake, it could be no real [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Only a few weeks after giving the Birkenhead lecture entitled &#8216;Dissenting judgments – self indulgence or self sacrifice?&#8217; (See David Hart QC’s previous post), Lord Kerr delivered the leading judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Rahmatullah.   Given that the issue of a man’s liberty was at stake, it could be no real surprise for Lord Kerr or anyone else that there were two dissenting judgments in the cross-appeal provided by Lord Carnwath and Lady Hale. They made clear that in their view the UK should have done more to secure the release of detainee Yunis Rahmatullah and in doing so raised questions as to the proper limits of judicial intervention into the &#8216;forbidden area&#8217; of foreign policy.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/11/03/the-dissenting-voices-in-rahmatullah-no-time-for-political-sensitivities/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 3rd November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/the-dissenting-voices-in-rahmatullah-no-time-for-political-sensitivities-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blow to Sarah&#8217;s Law as judges rule paedophiles&#8217; human rights should be considered &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/blow-to-sarahs-law-as-judges-rule-paedophiles-human-rights-should-be-considered-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/blow-to-sarahs-law-as-judges-rule-paedophiles-human-rights-should-be-considered-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[criminal records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual offences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A High Court ruling said paedophiles should be allowed to make representations before their details are revealed to members of the public.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 24th October 2012 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A High Court ruling said paedophiles should be allowed to make representations before their details are revealed to members of the public.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9630706/Blow-to-Sarahs-Law-as-judges-rule-paedophiles-human-rights-should-be-considered.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 24th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/blow-to-sarahs-law-as-judges-rule-paedophiles-human-rights-should-be-considered-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disclosure of sex offender information – new high court judgment &#8211; Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/disclosure-of-sex-offender-information-new-high-court-judgment-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/disclosure-of-sex-offender-information-new-high-court-judgment-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[criminal records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual offences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The High Court has today handed down an important judgment on the legality of the Government’s Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme (CSOD): X(South Yorkshire) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2954 (Admin). CSOD is a non statutory scheme which police forces nationally have been free to adopt since 2010. It enables [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The High Court has today handed down an important judgment on the legality of the Government’s Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme (CSOD): X(South Yorkshire) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2954 (Admin). CSOD is a non statutory scheme which police forces nationally have been free to adopt since 2010. It enables members of the public to ask the police to provide details of a person who has some form of contact with children with a view to ascertaining whether that person had convictions for sexual offences against children or whether there is other relevant information about him or her which ought to be made available.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com/2012/10/24/disclosure-of-sex-offender-information-new-high-court-judgment/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Panopticon, 24th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com">www.panopticonblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/disclosure-of-sex-offender-information-new-high-court-judgment-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we allow dissent – by our judges &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/why-we-allow-dissent-by-our-judges-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/why-we-allow-dissent-by-our-judges-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Why do judges disagree and publish their disagreements when cases get decided? After all, the Cabinet does not do so (openly at least), and our FTSE-100 companies do not generally do so, when their executives propose a merger or launch a new product. Surely, judicial dissent is a recipe for diminishing the authority of the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why do judges disagree and publish their disagreements when cases get decided? After all, the Cabinet does not do so (openly at least), and our FTSE-100 companies do not generally do so, when their executives propose a merger or launch a new product. Surely, judicial dissent is a recipe for diminishing the authority of the majority answer, and an invitation to self-indulgence on the part of the minority to re-fight lost and irrelevant battles.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/10/14/why-we-allow-dissent-by-our-judges/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 14th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/why-we-allow-dissent-by-our-judges-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the UK listening to the European Court of Human Rights? &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/is-the-uk-listening-to-the-european-court-of-human-rights-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/is-the-uk-listening-to-the-european-court-of-human-rights-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=78691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Ministry of Justice has published its annual report to the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the Government response to human rights judgments 2011–12. By signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights, the UK has committed to &#8216;abide by&#8217; judgments of the court. This commitment is monitored by the Council of Europe’s [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Ministry of Justice has published its annual report to the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the Government response to human rights judgments 2011–12. By signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights, the UK has committed to &#8216;abide by&#8217; judgments of the court. This commitment is monitored by the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers. The report presents a snapshot of the current state of play in relation to the European Court of Human Rights, makes for very interesting reading (trust me!). Here are some tidbits.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/09/12/is-the-uk-listening-to-the-european-court-of-human-rights/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 12th September 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/is-the-uk-listening-to-the-european-court-of-human-rights-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alvi judgement – how to handle cases &#8211; UK Border Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/alvi-judgement-how-to-handle-cases-uk-border-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/alvi-judgement-how-to-handle-cases-uk-border-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=78544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Guidance for caseworkers on deciding applications, responding to legal challenges and reconsideration requests.&#8221; Full guidance UK Border Agency, 7th September 2012 Source: www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Guidance for caseworkers on deciding applications, responding to legal challenges and reconsideration requests.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/policyandlaw/modernised/cross-cut/alvi-judgement/alvi.pdf?view=Binary">Full guidance</a></p>
<p>UK Border Agency, 7th September 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk">www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/alvi-judgement-how-to-handle-cases-uk-border-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In reL and another (Children) (Preliminary fact finding hearing: Judge’s power to reverse conclusions on findings of fact) &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/08/in-rel-and-another-children-preliminary-fact-finding-hearing-judges-power-to-reverse-conclusions-on-findings-of-fact-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/08/in-rel-and-another-children-preliminary-fact-finding-hearing-judges-power-to-reverse-conclusions-on-findings-of-fact-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[care orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[split hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=76855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reL and another (Children) (Preliminary fact finding hearing: Judge’s power to reverse conclusions on findings of fact) [2012] EWCA Civ 984; [2012] WLR (D) 240 &#8220;In respect of split hearings in family proceedings, the judge did not have a general licence to amend his judgment as to past fact at any time before he [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2012-240">In reL and another (Children) (Preliminary fact finding hearing: Judge’s power to reverse conclusions on findings of fact) [2012] EWCA Civ 984; [2012] WLR (D) 240</a></p>
<p>&#8220;In respect of split hearings in family proceedings, the judge did not have a general licence to amend his judgment as to past fact at any time before he had pronounced his judgment as to the future. In the interim period between judgment on a preliminary issue trial and the hearing of the second trial, a judge was precluded from taking account of developments relating to the findings on the preliminary issue trial unless they were substantial, if not fundamental. Where a judge was invited to expand his findings or reasons in further support of the stated conclusions in his judgment, he could not reverse his previously stated conclusion.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 18th July 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/08/in-rel-and-another-children-preliminary-fact-finding-hearing-judges-power-to-reverse-conclusions-on-findings-of-fact-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The air that we breathe: NGO’s appeal dismissed &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/the-air-that-we-breathe-ngos-appeal-dismissed-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/the-air-that-we-breathe-ngos-appeal-dismissed-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=73519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A newsflash, really, confirming that ClientEarth’s claim for a declaration and mandatory order against Defra in respect of air pollution was refused by the Court of Appeal, in line with the judgment below. And the lack of a link to the CA’s judgment because it is not available, I imagine, because the judgment was extempore, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A newsflash, really, confirming that ClientEarth’s claim for a declaration and mandatory order against Defra in respect of air pollution was refused by the Court of Appeal, in line with the judgment below. And the lack of a link to the CA’s judgment because it is not available, I imagine, because the judgment was extempore, and it is being transcribed at the moment. Sadly, that does not necessarily mean it gets onto  the public access site, Bailli, in due course: the first instance decision still languishes on subscription-only sites. So all I know is that ClientEarth’s appeal did not find favour with Laws and Pitchford LJJ, sitting with Sir John Chadwick, but this, as ClientEarth explains, may not be the end of the line.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/06/05/the-air-that-we-breathe-ngos-appeal-dismissed/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 5th June 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/06/the-air-that-we-breathe-ngos-appeal-dismissed-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julian Assange&#8217;s extradition stayed thanks to quick legal footwork &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/05/julian-assanges-extradition-stayed-thanks-to-quick-legal-footwork-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/05/julian-assanges-extradition-stayed-thanks-to-quick-legal-footwork-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=73391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Dinah Rose QC buys her client another two weeks &#8211; much to the supreme court&#8217;s embarrassment.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 30th May 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dinah Rose QC buys her client another two weeks &#8211; much to the supreme court&#8217;s embarrassment.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/may/30/assange-extradition-halted">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 30th May 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/05/julian-assanges-extradition-stayed-thanks-to-quick-legal-footwork-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courtroom cameras &#8216;risk turning trials into a circus&#8217; &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/courtroom-cameras-risk-turning-trials-into-a-circus-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/courtroom-cameras-risk-turning-trials-into-a-circus-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=69886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Plans to allow cameras into courtrooms would risk turning trials into media circuses and could jeopardise defendants&#8217; safety, ministers were warned last night by a leading solicitor.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 29th March 2012 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Plans to allow cameras into courtrooms would risk turning trials into media circuses and could jeopardise defendants&#8217; safety, ministers were warned last night by a leading solicitor.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/courtroom-cameras-risk-turning-trials-into-a-circus-7595013.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 29th March 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/courtroom-cameras-risk-turning-trials-into-a-circus-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord Neuberger&#8217;s seven principles empower judges to speak &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/lord-neubergers-seven-principles-empower-judges-to-speak-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/lord-neubergers-seven-principles-empower-judges-to-speak-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministers' powers and duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=69091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;What should judges be able say outside the courts? One of the most senior judges, Lord Neuberger, has proposed some principles for &#8216;extra-judicial&#8217; statements. These are likely to shape judicial contributions to public debate for some time to come, but do they go far enough?&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 16th March 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What should judges be able say outside the courts? One of the most senior judges, Lord Neuberger, has proposed some principles for &#8216;extra-judicial&#8217; statements. These are likely to shape judicial contributions to public debate for some time to come, but do they go far enough?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/mar/16/neuberger-principles-empower-judges">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 16th March 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/lord-neubergers-seven-principles-empower-judges-to-speak-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges issue guidelines for consideration of human trafficking &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/02/judges-issue-guidelines-for-consideration-of-human-trafficking-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/02/judges-issue-guidelines-for-consideration-of-human-trafficking-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trafficking in human beings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=67360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The &#8216;evil&#8217; crime of trafficking in human beings was highlighted by leading judges today.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 20th February 2012 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The &#8216;evil&#8217; crime of trafficking in human beings was highlighted by leading judges today.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/judges-issue-guidelines-for-consideration-of-human-trafficking-7232025.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 20th February 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/02/judges-issue-guidelines-for-consideration-of-human-trafficking-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judgment reserved in Twitter airport threat appeal &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/02/judgment-reserved-in-twitter-airport-threat-appeal-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/02/judgment-reserved-in-twitter-airport-threat-appeal-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threatening to destroy or damage property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=66711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Two senior judges have retired to consider whether a Twitter message threatening to blow up a snowbound Doncaster airport was a joke or a menace to society.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 8th February 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Two senior judges have retired to consider whether a Twitter message threatening to blow up a snowbound Doncaster airport was a joke or a menace to society.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/feb/08/judgment-reserved-twitter-threat-appeal">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 8th February 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/02/judgment-reserved-in-twitter-airport-threat-appeal-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are some rights to private life just not cricket? &#8211; Legal Week</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/are-some-rights-to-private-life-just-not-cricket-legal-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/are-some-rights-to-private-life-just-not-cricket-legal-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=63783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Given previous poor reporting of human rights cases, alarm bells began to ring when the Sunday Telegraph recently reported student Abdullah Munawar&#8217;s appeal on human rights grounds against a refusal to grant him leave to stay in the UK, citing his playing cricket as a reason he had a private life under Article 8 of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Given previous poor reporting of human rights cases, alarm bells began to ring when the Sunday Telegraph recently reported student Abdullah Munawar&#8217;s appeal on human rights grounds against a refusal to grant him leave to stay in the UK, citing his playing cricket as a reason he had a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/blog-post/2136255/rights-private-life-cricket?WT.rss_f=&#038;WT.rss_a=Are+some+rights+to+private+life+just+not+cricket%3F">Full story</a></p>
<p>Legal Week, 10th January 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legalweek.com">www.legalweek.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/are-some-rights-to-private-life-just-not-cricket-legal-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cases in point &#8211; The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/cases-in-point-the-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/cases-in-point-the-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=63777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The top cases of 2011 show why London is still the centre of the litigation world &#8211; and why it is likely to stay that way.&#8221; Full story The Lawyer, 9th January 2012 Source: www.thelawyer.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The top cases of 2011 show why London is still the centre of the litigation world &#8211; and why it is likely to stay that way.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/cases-in-point/1010834.article">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Lawyer, 9th January 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com">www.thelawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/cases-in-point-the-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designated Officer for Sunderland Magistrates Court v Krager and another &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/12/designated-officer-for-sunderland-magistrates-court-v-krager-and-another-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/12/designated-officer-for-sunderland-magistrates-court-v-krager-and-another-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charging orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=63077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Designated Officer for Sunderland Magistrates Court v Krager and another: [2011] EWHC 3283 (Ch);  [2011] WLR (D)  367 &#8220;The Crown Court did not have exclusive jurisdiction in relation to all aspects of the enforcement of confiscation orders.&#8221; WLR Daily, 14th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2011-367">Designated Officer for Sunderland Magistrates Court v Krager and another: [2011] EWHC 3283 (Ch);  [2011] WLR (D)  367</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The Crown Court did not have exclusive jurisdiction in relation to all aspects of the enforcement of confiscation orders.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 14th December 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/12/designated-officer-for-sunderland-magistrates-court-v-krager-and-another-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re A (Children) (Judgment: Adequacy of Trial Judge’s Reasoning) &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/12/in-re-a-children-judgment-adequacy-of-trial-judge%e2%80%99s-reasoning-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/12/in-re-a-children-judgment-adequacy-of-trial-judge%e2%80%99s-reasoning-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=62323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re A (Children) (Judgment: Adequacy of Trial Judge’s Reasoning) [2011] EWCA Civ 1205; [2011] WLR (D) 346 &#8220;The Court of Appeal gave guidance as to the practice to be adopted where there was concern about the adequacy of a trial judge’s reasoning, when adjourning, part heard, an appeal by the mother of two children, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2011-346">In re A (Children) (Judgment: Adequacy of Trial Judge’s Reasoning) [2011] EWCA Civ 1205; [2011] WLR (D) 346</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The Court of Appeal gave guidance as to the practice to be adopted where there was concern about the adequacy of a trial judge’s reasoning, when adjourning, part heard, an appeal by the mother of two children, A and L, against the decision of Judge Compston, sitting as a judge of the Family Division on 27 May 2011, as to the adequacy of his judgment on a fact finding hearing in ongoing care proceedings relating to the children, and inviting the judge to provide such further reasons on particular matters as he might think appropriate by way of elucidation, clarification, elaboration or otherwise of his judgment.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 27th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/12/in-re-a-children-judgment-adequacy-of-trial-judge%e2%80%99s-reasoning-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK supreme court judges air concerns over having to follow Europe&#8217;s lead &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/uk-supreme-court-judges-air-concerns-over-having-to-follow-europes-lead-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/uk-supreme-court-judges-air-concerns-over-having-to-follow-europes-lead-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=60192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The UK&#8217;s supreme court is not always &#8216;supreme&#8217; because it has to follow the lead of the European court of human rights in Strasbourg, whose rulings are sometimes too narrow in scope, according to the country&#8217;s most senior judge, Lord Phillips.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 26th October 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The UK&#8217;s supreme court is not always &#8216;supreme&#8217; because it has to follow the lead of the European court of human rights in Strasbourg, whose rulings are sometimes too narrow in scope, according to the country&#8217;s most senior judge, Lord Phillips.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/oct/26/uk-supreme-court-european-court-human-rights">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 26th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/uk-supreme-court-judges-air-concerns-over-having-to-follow-europes-lead-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcripts Guide &#8211; revised edition</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/transcripts-guide-revised-edition-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/transcripts-guide-revised-edition-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=60072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In February of this year the Inner Temple Library produced a revised edition of Transcripts of Judicial Proceedings in England and Wales: a guide to sources. Since that edition was published a number of changes caused by the creation of Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, and of the new government web portal, Justice, have [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In February of this year the Inner Temple Library produced a revised edition of <em>Transcripts of Judicial Proceedings in England and Wales: a guide to sources</em>.</p>
<p>Since that edition was published a number of changes caused by the creation of Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, and of the new government web portal, Justice, have affected the currency of some of the content. The information in the Guide has been updated, and is now, as far as possible, correct as at 1 July 2011.</p>
<p>More information can be found <a href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/transcripts-guide/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/transcripts-guide-revised-edition-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts need not be bound by Europe, says top judge &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/courts-need-not-be-bound-by-europe-says-top-judge-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/courts-need-not-be-bound-by-europe-says-top-judge-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precedent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=59808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, said the UK need only &#8216;take account&#8217; of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights but not necessarily follow it.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 20th october 2011 Source: www.teelgraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, said the UK need only &#8216;take account&#8217; of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights but not necessarily follow it.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8836487/Courts-need-not-be-bound-by-Europe-says-top-judge.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 20th october 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.teelgraph.co.uk">www.teelgraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/courts-need-not-be-bound-by-europe-says-top-judge-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent schools can decide charitable status, says Tribunal &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/independent-schools-can-decide-charitable-status-says-tribunal-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/independent-schools-can-decide-charitable-status-says-tribunal-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=59680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8221; It is not for the Charity Commission or the courts to impose on trustees of a school their own idea of what is for the &#8216;public benefit&#8217; so as to qualify for charitable status, the Upper Tribunal has ruled. In a detailed assessment of the law on charitable status both before and after the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; It is not for the Charity Commission or the courts to impose on trustees of a school their own idea of what is for the &#8216;public benefit&#8217; so as to qualify for charitable status, the Upper Tribunal has ruled. In a detailed assessment of the law on charitable status both before and after the Charities Act, the Tribunal has indicated that the Act has not introduced any legal requirement to act in a way prescribed by the Charity Commission or anyone else.  Provided they run their charity to ensure that the poor are able to benefit in a way that is more than minimal or tokenistic, they should be free to make their own considered assessment of what is for the &#8216;public benefit&#8217; in the circumstances pertaining to their own institution.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/10/18/independent-schools-are-still-charities-says-tribunal/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 18th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/independent-schools-can-decide-charitable-status-says-tribunal-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Hale leads panel making feminist readings of court judgments &#8211; The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/lady-hale-leads-panel-making-feminist-readings-of-court-judgments-the-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/lady-hale-leads-panel-making-feminist-readings-of-court-judgments-the-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=59661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A panel of distinguished female lawyers and legal scholars gathered at Norton Rose’s InterLaw Diversity Forum event on Thursday 13 October to discuss judgments from a feminist lawyer’s point of view.&#8221; Full story The Lawyer, 17th October 2011 Source: www.thelawyer.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A panel of distinguished female lawyers and legal scholars gathered at Norton Rose’s InterLaw Diversity Forum event on Thursday 13 October to discuss judgments from a feminist lawyer’s point of view.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/lady-hale-leads-panel-making-feminist-readings-of-court-judgments/1009845.article">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Lawyer, 17th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com">www.thelawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/lady-hale-leads-panel-making-feminist-readings-of-court-judgments-the-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Carver merry-go-round and assorted other attractions &#8211; Zenith Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/the-carver-merry-go-round-and-assorted-other-attractions-zenith-chambers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/the-carver-merry-go-round-and-assorted-other-attractions-zenith-chambers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil procedure rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 36 offers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=59316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;New rules and developments in Part 36.&#8221; Full story (PDF) Zenith Chambers, 10th October 2011 Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;New rules and developments in Part 36.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.zenithchambers.co.uk/cms/document/Part_36_update_article.pdf">Full story</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Zenith Chambers, 10th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.zenithchambers.co.uk">www.zenithchambers.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/the-carver-merry-go-round-and-assorted-other-attractions-zenith-chambers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court rules computer simulations can obtain patent protection &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/high-court-rules-computer-simulations-can-obtain-patent-protection-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/high-court-rules-computer-simulations-can-obtain-patent-protection-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=59314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Computer simulations of designs are not &#8216;unpatentable&#8217; mental acts, the High Court has ruled.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 11th October 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Computer simulations of designs are not &#8216;unpatentable&#8217; mental acts, the High Court has ruled.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2011/october/high-court-rules-computer-simulations-can-obtain-patent-protection/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 11th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/high-court-rules-computer-simulations-can-obtain-patent-protection-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t throw the BAILII out with the bath water &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/dont-throw-the-bailii-out-with-the-bath-water-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/dont-throw-the-bailii-out-with-the-bath-water-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=58616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Guardian published an editorial today (26 September) arguing that court judgments should be opened up to the public. The editorial challenges the fact that BAILII, the charity which currently publishes most judgments online, is not searchable on Google.&#8221; Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 26th September 2011 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Guardian published an editorial today (26 September) arguing that court judgments should be opened up to the public. The editorial challenges the fact that BAILII, the charity which currently publishes most judgments online, is not searchable on Google.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/09/26/dont-throw-the-bailii-out-with-the-bath-water/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 26th September 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/dont-throw-the-bailii-out-with-the-bath-water-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Televised sentencing: a screen test for open justice &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/televised-sentencing-a-screen-test-for-open-justice-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/televised-sentencing-a-screen-test-for-open-justice-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=57642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;David Cameron&#8217;s plan to allow TV cameras into court will shed light on the judicial process but, crucially, leave parts in the dark.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 6th September 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;David Cameron&#8217;s plan to allow TV cameras into court will shed light on the judicial process but, crucially, leave parts in the dark.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/sep/06/televised-sentencing-courts-cameras-cameron">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 6th September 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/televised-sentencing-a-screen-test-for-open-justice-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Cameron to announce court verdicts will be televised &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/david-cameron-to-announce-court-verdicts-will-be-televised-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/david-cameron-to-announce-court-verdicts-will-be-televised-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verdicts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=57609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Judges&#8217; sentencing of offenders is to be televised under plans to be unveiled by the prime minister shortly, the Guardian has learned.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 5th September 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Judges&#8217; sentencing of offenders is to be televised under plans to be unveiled by the prime minister shortly, the Guardian has learned.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/sep/05/david-cameron-court-verdicts-televised">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 5th September 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/david-cameron-to-announce-court-verdicts-will-be-televised-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcript: Judge criticises prosecutors over disclosure of evidence &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/08/transcript-judge-criticises-prosecutors-over-disclosure-of-evidence-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/08/transcript-judge-criticises-prosecutors-over-disclosure-of-evidence-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crown Prosecution Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withholding information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=56916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This is the transcript of the judge&#8217;s comments in one of the three cases in which the Crown Prosecution Service has been accused of withholding evidence.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 17th August 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is the transcript of the judge&#8217;s comments in one of the three cases in which the Crown Prosecution Service has been accused of withholding evidence.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/undercover-with-paul-lewis-and-rob-evans/interactive/2011/aug/17/disclosure-of-evidence">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 17th August 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/08/transcript-judge-criticises-prosecutors-over-disclosure-of-evidence-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitration ruling shields London status &#8211; The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/08/arbitration-ruling-shields-london-status-the-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/08/arbitration-ruling-shields-london-status-the-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=56258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;There was a collective sigh of relief last week as the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court ruling to find that arbitrators cannot be classed as employees and therefore are not subject to UK equality rules.&#8221; Full story The Lawyer, 1st August 2011 Source: www.thelawyer.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There was a collective sigh of relief last week as the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court ruling to find that arbitrators cannot be classed as employees and therefore are not subject to UK equality rules.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/arbitration-ruling-shields-london-status/1008804.article">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Lawyer, 1st August 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com">www.thelawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/08/arbitration-ruling-shields-london-status-the-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wilberforce silk fails to win over Supreme Court in pensions case &#8211; The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/wilberforce-silk-fails-to-win-over-supreme-court-in-pensions-case-the-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/wilberforce-silk-fails-to-win-over-supreme-court-in-pensions-case-the-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=56003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) is set to redraft pensions legislation after defeat in a key pensions case in the Supreme Court this morning.&#8221; Full story The Lawyer, 27th July 2011 Source: www.thelawyer.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) is set to redraft pensions legislation after defeat in a key pensions case in the Supreme Court this morning.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/wilberforce-silk-fails-to-win-over-supreme-court-in-pensions-case/1008773.article">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Lawyer, 27th July 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com">www.thelawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/wilberforce-silk-fails-to-win-over-supreme-court-in-pensions-case-the-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online marketplaces liable for sellers&#8217; infringement in &#8216;promoted&#8217; sales, says ECJ &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/online-marketplaces-liable-for-sellers-infringement-in-promoted-sales-says-ecj-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/online-marketplaces-liable-for-sellers-infringement-in-promoted-sales-says-ecj-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=54958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;EBay and other online marketplaces will be liable for sellers&#8217; trade mark infringements if they promote infringing sales or help sellers to &#8216;optimise&#8217; their pages, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 12th July 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;EBay and other online marketplaces will be liable for sellers&#8217; trade mark infringements if they promote infringing sales or help sellers to &#8216;optimise&#8217; their pages, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-12077">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 12th July 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/online-marketplaces-liable-for-sellers-infringement-in-promoted-sales-says-ecj-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred Goodwin told by judge details of his affair were in the public interest &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/fred-goodwin-told-by-judge-details-of-his-affair-were-in-the-public-interest-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/fred-goodwin-told-by-judge-details-of-his-affair-were-in-the-public-interest-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=53257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The former chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland could not have expected to keep an alleged affair with a colleague concealed by the use of privacy injunctions because the nature of his job meant there was a public interest in his relationships, a judge has said.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 9th June 2011 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The former chief executive of the Royal Bank of  Scotland could not have expected to keep an alleged affair with a  colleague concealed by the use of privacy injunctions because the  nature of his job meant there was a public interest in his relationships, a  judge has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/09/fred-goodwin-judge-affair-public-interest">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 9th June 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk ">www.guardian.co.uk </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/fred-goodwin-told-by-judge-details-of-his-affair-were-in-the-public-interest-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of an injunction: OPQ v two anonymous others &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/anatomy-of-an-injunction-opq-v-two-anonymous-others-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/anatomy-of-an-injunction-opq-v-two-anonymous-others-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=52466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We identify the key passages in the judgment handed down allowing an injunction for a man known only as OPQ.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 24th May 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We identify the key passages in the judgment handed down allowing an injunction for a man known only as OPQ.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/interactive/2011/may/24/privacy-superinjunctions">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 24th May 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/anatomy-of-an-injunction-opq-v-two-anonymous-others-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Secretary warning over ECHR judgments &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/justice-secretary-warning-over-echr-judgments-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/justice-secretary-warning-over-echr-judgments-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=50938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has been &#8216;rather too ready to substitute its own judgment for that of national courts&#8217;, the Justice Secretary said today.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 26th April 2011 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has been &#8216;rather too ready to substitute its own judgment for that of national courts&#8217;, the Justice Secretary said today.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/justice-secretary-warning-over-echr-judgments-2274962.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 26th April 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/justice-secretary-warning-over-echr-judgments-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court results put on Twitter by West Midlands Police &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/court-results-put-on-twitter-by-west-midlands-police-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/court-results-put-on-twitter-by-west-midlands-police-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=50792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Results from cases heard at Birmingham Magistrates&#8217; Court are being put on Twitter by West Midlands Police.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 19th April 2011 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Results from cases heard at Birmingham Magistrates&#8217; Court are being put on Twitter by West Midlands Police.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-13127533">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 19th April 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/court-results-put-on-twitter-by-west-midlands-police-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Community trade mark court rulings should apply across the EU, ECJ rules &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/community-trade-mark-court-rulings-should-apply-across-the-eu-ecj-rules-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/community-trade-mark-court-rulings-should-apply-across-the-eu-ecj-rules-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=50568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Rulings by Community trade mark courts should in most cases apply across the EU and not just in the country in which they were made, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 13th April 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rulings by Community trade mark courts should in most cases apply across the EU and not just in the country in which they were made, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=11866&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+(OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP)&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 13th April 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/community-trade-mark-court-rulings-should-apply-across-the-eu-ecj-rules-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicians to blame for human rights rulings, says judge &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/politicians-to-blame-for-human-rights-rulings-says-judge-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/politicians-to-blame-for-human-rights-rulings-says-judge-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=49855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Politicians should stop criticising human rights ruling as they are to blame for tying the hands of courts, the country’s most senior judge signalled yesterday.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 29th March 2011 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Politicians should stop criticising human rights ruling as they are to blame for tying the hands of courts, the country’s most senior judge signalled yesterday.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8412152/Politicians-to-blame-for-human-rights-rulings-says-judge.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 29th March 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/politicians-to-blame-for-human-rights-rulings-says-judge-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Master of the rolls to judges: keep your judgments simple &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/master-of-the-rolls-to-judges-keep-your-judgments-simple-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/master-of-the-rolls-to-judges-keep-your-judgments-simple-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=49649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Judges should avoid making judgments that are &#8216;readable by few, comprehendible by fewer still&#8217;, said Lord Neuberger in a speech on open justice last week. With a nod to Gilbert and Sullivan&#8217;s accessible opera he offered Lord Atkin&#8217;s decision in Donoghue v Stevenson as &#8216;a very model of a modern major judgment&#8217;. The case, decided [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Judges should avoid making judgments that are &#8216;readable by few, comprehendible by fewer still&#8217;, said Lord Neuberger in a speech on open justice last week. With a nod to Gilbert and Sullivan&#8217;s accessible opera he offered Lord Atkin&#8217;s decision in Donoghue v Stevenson as &#8216;a very model of a modern major judgment&#8217;. The case, decided by the House of Lords in 1932, features a decomposed snail in a bottle of ginger beer and is known to every lawyer in the land: it sets out, in clear terms, the scope of the law of negligence.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/mar/23/master-of-the-rolls-simple-judgment">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 23rd March 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/master-of-the-rolls-to-judges-keep-your-judgments-simple-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Justice Unbound? &#8211; Speech by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/open-justice-unbound-speech-by-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/open-justice-unbound-speech-by-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=49230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open Justice Unbound? (PDF) Speech by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, Master of the Rolls Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture, 16th March 2011 Source: www.judiciary.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/mr-speech-jsb-lecture-march-2011.pdf">Open Justice Unbound?</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Speech by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, Master of the Rolls</p>
<p>Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture, 16th March 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk">www.judiciary.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/open-justice-unbound-speech-by-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full judgment: Attorney general v Associated Newspapers and News Group Newspapers &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/full-judgment-attorney-general-v-associated-newspapers-and-news-group-newspapers-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/full-judgment-attorney-general-v-associated-newspapers-and-news-group-newspapers-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=48572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Read the judgment from the high court finding the Mail Online and Sun Online guilty of contempt after publishing online image of accused man with pistol during murder trial.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 3rd March 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Read the judgment from the high court finding the Mail Online and Sun Online guilty of contempt after publishing online image of accused man with pistol during murder trial.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/interactive/2011/mar/03/mail-sun-online-contempt-judgment">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 3rd March 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/full-judgment-attorney-general-v-associated-newspapers-and-news-group-newspapers-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
