<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; freedom of expression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/freedom-of-expression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>We should have anonymity for people who have been arrested but not charged, says Theresa May &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministers' powers and duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Criminal suspects who have been arrested should not normally be named until they are charged, the Home Secretary has said.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 16th May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Criminal suspects who have been arrested should not normally be named until they are charged, the Home Secretary has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-8618255.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 16th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/we-should-have-anonymity-for-people-who-have-been-arrested-but-not-charged-says-theresa-may-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should parliament give itself more powers? &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/should-parliament-give-itself-more-powers-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/should-parliament-give-itself-more-powers-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[constitutional reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Should parliament give itself more powers? That&#8217;s the intriguing question posed by a paper to be published next week by the Constitution Society, an educational charity established five years ago.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 2nd May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Should parliament give itself more powers? That&#8217;s the intriguing question posed by a paper to be published next week by the Constitution Society, an educational charity established five years ago.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/may/02/parliament-give-itself-more-powers">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 2nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/should-parliament-give-itself-more-powers-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamation Act reforms libel law &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/defamation-act-reforms-libel-law-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/defamation-act-reforms-libel-law-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Large scale reforms to the law governing cases of defamation have today become law as the Defamation Bill gains Royal Assent.&#8221; Full press release Ministry of Justice, 25th April 2013 Source: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Large scale reforms to the law governing cases of defamation have today become law as the Defamation Bill gains Royal Assent.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/defamation-act-reforms-libel-law">Full press release</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 25th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice">www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/defamation-act-reforms-libel-law-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff King: Deference, Dialogue and Animal Defenders International &#8211; UK Constitutional Law Group</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/jeff-king-deference-dialogue-and-animal-defenders-international-uk-constitutional-law-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/jeff-king-deference-dialogue-and-animal-defenders-international-uk-constitutional-law-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In Animal Defenders International, the European Court of Human Rights upheld the British ban on political advertising in the broadcast media (s.321 Communications Act 2003), consistently with the judgments of the UK House of Lords and High Court, but in an apparent departure from its previous caselaw in the VgT (Verein gegen Tierfabrik v. Switzerland, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In Animal Defenders International, the European Court of Human Rights upheld the British ban on political advertising in the broadcast media (s.321 Communications Act 2003), consistently with the judgments of the UK House of Lords and High Court, but in an apparent departure from its previous caselaw in the VgT (Verein gegen Tierfabrik v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94 ECHR 2001‑VI) case. The key issue in the case was whether a blanket ban (or ‘general measure’) was a proportionate restriction of the freedom of expression, or whether some class of exception (a ‘case-by-case’ approach) for groups such as the NGO in this case ought to be recognized.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Constitutional Law Group, 25th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/">www.ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/jeff-king-deference-dialogue-and-animal-defenders-international-uk-constitutional-law-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveson report: Newspapers reject press regulation plans &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/leveson-report-newspapers-reject-press-regulation-plans-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/leveson-report-newspapers-reject-press-regulation-plans-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The newspaper industry has rejected a plan for press regulation agreed by the three main political parties in the wake of the Leveson Inquiry.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 25th April 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The newspaper industry has rejected a plan for press regulation agreed by the<br />
three main political parties in the wake of the Leveson Inquiry.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22294722#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 25th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/leveson-report-newspapers-reject-press-regulation-plans-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government will be mightily relieved at decision to uphold political ads ban &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/government-will-be-mightily-relieved-at-decision-to-uphold-political-ads-ban-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/government-will-be-mightily-relieved-at-decision-to-uphold-political-ads-ban-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The court&#8217;s decision turned on the judges&#8217; assessment of what restrictions are necessary in a democratic society.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The court&#8217;s decision turned on the judges&#8217; assessment of what restrictions are necessary in a democratic society.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/apr/22/government-relieved-decision-political-ad">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/government-will-be-mightily-relieved-at-decision-to-uphold-political-ads-ban-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jacob Rowbottom: A surprise ruling? Strasbourg upholds the ban on paid political ads on TV and Radio &#8211; UK Constitutional Law Group</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/jacob-rowbottom-a-surprise-ruling-strasbourg-upholds-the-ban-on-paid-political-ads-on-tv-and-radio-uk-constitutional-law-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/jacob-rowbottom-a-surprise-ruling-strasbourg-upholds-the-ban-on-paid-political-ads-on-tv-and-radio-uk-constitutional-law-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal cruelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The European Court of Human Rights has given its decision in Animal Defenders International , holding that the ban on political advertising on the broadcast media does not violate Article 10. I had been convinced that the Strasbourg Court, following earlier decisions in Switzerland and Norway, would come to the opposite conclusion – but I [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The European Court of Human Rights has given its decision in Animal Defenders International , holding that the ban on political advertising on the broadcast media does not violate Article 10. I had been convinced that the Strasbourg Court, following earlier decisions in Switzerland and Norway, would come to the opposite conclusion – but I am relieved that they did not. The ban on political ads has been a crucial measure that has helped to keep the cost of politics down in the UK.  That said, it was a close shave. The ban was upheld by a majority of 9, with 8 dissenting. The decision was published earlier this morning, so what follows are my initial thoughts.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/04/22/jacob-rowbottom-a-surprise-ruling-strasbourg-upholds-the-ban-on-paid-political-ads-on-tv-and-radio/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Constitutional Law Group, 22nd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukconstitutionallaw.org">www.ukconstitutionallaw.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/jacob-rowbottom-a-surprise-ruling-strasbourg-upholds-the-ban-on-paid-political-ads-on-tv-and-radio-uk-constitutional-law-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christians launch landmark human rights case &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/christians-launch-landmark-human-rights-case-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/christians-launch-landmark-human-rights-case-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health & safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Christians are to launch a landmark legal case arguing their religion is being treated as a &#8216;thought crime&#8217; by government and courts.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 20th April 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Christians are to launch a landmark legal case arguing their religion is being treated as a &#8216;thought crime&#8217; by government and courts.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10007641/Christians-launch-landmark-human-rights-case.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 20th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/christians-launch-landmark-human-rights-case-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK ban on political advertising may be lifted &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/uk-ban-on-political-advertising-may-be-lifted-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/uk-ban-on-political-advertising-may-be-lifted-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal cruelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Britain may be forced to lift its ban on political advertising when the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) rules on its lawfulness tomorrow.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 21st April 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Britain may be forced to lift its ban on political advertising when the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) rules on its lawfulness tomorrow.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/advertising/uk-ban-on-political-advertising-may-be-lifted-8581502.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 21st April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/uk-ban-on-political-advertising-may-be-lifted-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing the manifestation of faith in the workplace &#8211; No. 5 Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/managing-the-manifestation-of-faith-in-the-workplace-no-5-chambers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/managing-the-manifestation-of-faith-in-the-workplace-no-5-chambers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Fatim Kurji considers the European Court of Human Rights’ verdict in the case of Eweida &#038; Others v The United Kingdom [2013] IRLR 231.&#8221; Full story No. 5 Chambers, 18th March 2013 Source: www.no5.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fatim Kurji considers the European Court of Human Rights’ verdict in the case of Eweida &#038; Others v The United Kingdom [2013] IRLR 231.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.no5.com/news-and-publications/publications/206-managing-the-manifestation-of-faith-in-the-workplace/">Full story</a></p>
<p>No. 5 Chambers, 18th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.no5.com">www.no5.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/managing-the-manifestation-of-faith-in-the-workplace-no-5-chambers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who, what, why: Can police stop protests at Margaret Thatcher’s funeral? &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/who-what-why-can-police-stop-protests-at-margaret-thatchers-funeral-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/who-what-why-can-police-stop-protests-at-margaret-thatchers-funeral-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;There has been widespread speculation that protests will take place during the funeral of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. But what laws will be in force?&#8221; Full story BBC News, 16th April 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There has been widespread speculation that protests will take place during the funeral of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. But what laws will be in force?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22160801">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 16th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/who-what-why-can-police-stop-protests-at-margaret-thatchers-funeral-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thatcher funeral: Police plan to arrest protesters under &#8216;draconian&#8217; Public Order Act &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/thatcher-funeral-police-plan-to-arrest-protesters-under-draconian-public-order-act-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/thatcher-funeral-police-plan-to-arrest-protesters-under-draconian-public-order-act-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Campaigners reacted angrily last night after Scotland Yard suggested protesters should consider avoiding Baroness Thatcher’s cortège – because they face arrest under a controversial public order law.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 15th April 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Campaigners reacted angrily last night after Scotland Yard suggested protesters should consider avoiding Baroness Thatcher’s cortège – because they face arrest under a controversial public order law.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/thatcher-funeral-police-plan-to-arrest-protesters-under-draconian-public-order-act-8572580.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 15th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/thatcher-funeral-police-plan-to-arrest-protesters-under-draconian-public-order-act-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blow to freedom of speech as key libel reform the Defamation Bill is blocked &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-the-inde/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-the-inde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government is to block plans to reform Britain’s &#8216;chilling&#8217; libel laws and to prevent large companies from silencing their critics with the threat of being sued.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 15th April 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government is to block plans to reform Britain’s &#8216;chilling&#8217; libel laws and to prevent large companies from silencing their critics with the threat of being sued.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-8574218.html">Full story</a> </p>
<p>The Independent, 15th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/blow-to-freedom-of-speech-as-key-libel-reform-the-defamation-bill-is-blocked-the-inde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Leveson: Stephen Sedley on press regulation &#8211; London Review of Books</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/after-leveson-london-review-of-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/after-leveson-london-review-of-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Privy Council, which will now be responsible for issuing a royal charter setting up a panel to vet the independence of a new press regulator, started licensing books in 1538. In 1557 a royal charter gave the members of the Stationers’ Company a monopoly of printing. In 1588 the anti-episcopal Marprelate Tracts (one of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Privy Council, which will now be responsible for issuing a royal charter setting up a panel to vet the independence of a new press regulator, started licensing books in 1538. In 1557 a royal charter gave the members of the Stationers’ Company a monopoly of printing. In 1588 the anti-episcopal Marprelate Tracts (one of whose authors, John Penry, was executed for publishing them) provoked a system of press licensing which survived in one form or another, though with diminishing effect, until the last decade of the 17th century.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n07/stephen-sedley/after-leveson">Full story</a></p>
<p>London Review of Books, 11th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk">www.lrb.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/after-leveson-london-review-of-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court backs ban against teacher who condemned &#8216;homosexual lifestyle&#8217; &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/high-court-backs-ban-against-teacher-who-condemned-homosexual-lifestyle-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/high-court-backs-ban-against-teacher-who-condemned-homosexual-lifestyle-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[disciplinary procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The High Court has upheld a classroom ban on a Christian school teacher who condemned the &#8216;homosexual lifestyle&#8217; in front of pupils.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 12th April 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The High Court has upheld a classroom ban on a Christian school teacher who condemned the &#8216;homosexual lifestyle&#8217; in front of pupils.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/high-court-backs-ban-against-teacher-who-condemned-homosexual-lifestyle-8570067.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 12th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/high-court-backs-ban-against-teacher-who-condemned-homosexual-lifestyle-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamation bill faces fresh attack from Conservatives &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/defamation-bill-faces-fresh-attack-from-conservatives-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/defamation-bill-faces-fresh-attack-from-conservatives-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The defamation bill, which was last month threatened with obliteration after a political row over Leveson press reforms, is once again under attack, but this time by the Tories who want to get rid of two key sections.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 11th April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The defamation bill, which was last month threatened with obliteration after a political row over Leveson press reforms, is once again under attack, but this time by the Tories who want to get rid of two key sections.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/apr/11/defamation-bill-faces-fresh-attack">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 11th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/defamation-bill-faces-fresh-attack-from-conservatives-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New equality guidance &#8220;recommends best practice&#8221; rather than creates new rights, says expert &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/new-equality-guidance-recommends-best-practice-rather-than-creates-new-rights-says-expert-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/new-equality-guidance-recommends-best-practice-rather-than-creates-new-rights-says-expert-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[belief discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Guidance on how employers should deal with requests made by employees in relation to religion or belief does not create new rights, but rather recommends &#8216;good practice&#8217; to help employers comply with existing laws, an expert has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 10th April 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Guidance on how employers should deal with requests made by employees in relation to religion or belief does not create new rights, but rather recommends &#8216;good practice&#8217; to help employers comply with existing laws, an expert has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/april/new-equality-guidance-recommends-best-practice-rather-than-creates-new-rights-says-expert/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 10th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/new-equality-guidance-recommends-best-practice-rather-than-creates-new-rights-says-expert-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vegans and druids to gain workplace rights under new equality rules &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/vegans-and-druids-to-gain-workplace-rights-under-new-equality-rules-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/vegans-and-druids-to-gain-workplace-rights-under-new-equality-rules-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[belief discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Vegetarian or vegan employees with deeply held beliefs should be allowed to exert their rights in the workplace by refusing to clean out office fridges containing meat or dairy products, according to new guidance.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 7th April 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Vegetarian or vegan employees with deeply held beliefs should be allowed to exert their rights in the workplace by refusing to clean out office fridges containing meat or dairy products, according to new guidance.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9977214/Vegans-and-druids-to-gain-workplace-rights-under-new-equality-rules.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 7th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/vegans-and-druids-to-gain-workplace-rights-under-new-equality-rules-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-councillor fails to suppress story about being drunk in supermarket in charge of daughter &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/ex-councillor-fails-to-suppress-story-about-being-drunk-in-supermarket-in-charge-of-daughter-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/ex-councillor-fails-to-suppress-story-about-being-drunk-in-supermarket-in-charge-of-daughter-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alcohol abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Labour councillor fined £100 after admitting being drunk in a supermarket while in charge of her two-year-old daughter has lost a High Court anonymity fight.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 29th March 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Labour councillor fined £100 after admitting being drunk in a supermarket while in charge of her two-year-old daughter has lost a High Court anonymity fight.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/excouncillor-fails-to-suppress-story-about-being-drunk-in-supermarket-in-charge-of-daughter-8554775.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 29th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/ex-councillor-fails-to-suppress-story-about-being-drunk-in-supermarket-in-charge-of-daughter-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julie Burchill entitled to &#8216;offend&#8217; transsexuals, press watchdog rules &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/julie-burchill-entitled-to-offend-transsexuals-press-watchdog-rules-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/julie-burchill-entitled-to-offend-transsexuals-press-watchdog-rules-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transsexuals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Julie Burchill was entitled to write a controversial article about transsexuals because she was expressing her opinion, the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) has ruled.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 26th March 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Julie Burchill was entitled to write a controversial article about transsexuals<br />
because she was expressing her opinion, the Press Complaints Commission (PCC)<br />
has ruled.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9954733/Julie-Burchill-entitled-to-offend-transsexuals-press-watchdog-rules.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 26th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/julie-burchill-entitled-to-offend-transsexuals-press-watchdog-rules-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Individuals &#8216;have no right&#8217; to stop name being used online &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/individuals-have-no-right-to-stop-name-being-used-online-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/individuals-have-no-right-to-stop-name-being-used-online-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Ordinary people have no right to stop their names being used in web addresses because they are not famous enough, according to regulators.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 27th March 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ordinary people have no right to stop their names being used in web addresses<br />
because they are not famous enough, according to regulators.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/9955908/Individuals-have-no-right-to-stop-name-being-used-online.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 27th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/individuals-have-no-right-to-stop-name-being-used-online-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs likely to be excluded from press reforms by House of Lords &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/blogs-likely-to-be-excluded-from-press-reforms-by-house-of-lords-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/blogs-likely-to-be-excluded-from-press-reforms-by-house-of-lords-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Fears that bloggers and small-scale news websites will be dragged into the new proposed system of press regulation, so facing crippling costs, appeared to be lifting on Friday when Labour and the Liberal Democrats agreed to table last-minute amendments in the Lords to make it clear they will be excluded.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fears that bloggers and small-scale news websites will be dragged into the new proposed system of press regulation, so facing crippling costs, appeared to be lifting on Friday when Labour and the Liberal Democrats agreed to table last-minute amendments in the Lords to make it clear they will be excluded.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/22/blogs-excluded-press-reforms-lords">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/blogs-likely-to-be-excluded-from-press-reforms-by-house-of-lords-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Probation officers face social media gag as outsourcing row rumbles on &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/probation-officers-face-social-media-gag-as-outsourcing-row-rumbles-on-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/probation-officers-face-social-media-gag-as-outsourcing-row-rumbles-on-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil servants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The justice secretary, Chris Grayling, has issued instructions that probation officers face the risk of disciplinary action if they publicly criticise on Twitter or other social media his plans to outsource 70% of their work with offenders.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 21st March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The justice secretary, Chris Grayling, has issued instructions that probation officers face the risk of disciplinary action if they publicly criticise on Twitter or other social media his plans to outsource 70% of their work with offenders.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/mar/21/probation-officers-social-media-gag-outsourcing">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/probation-officers-face-social-media-gag-as-outsourcing-row-rumbles-on-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameron pulls the plug on press talks – and sets stage for fight &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/cameron-pulls-the-plug-on-press-talks-and-sets-stage-for-fight-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/cameron-pulls-the-plug-on-press-talks-and-sets-stage-for-fight-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;PM&#8217;s ejector-seat diplomacy over Leveson leaves him facing a complex parliamentary battle.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 14th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;PM&#8217;s ejector-seat diplomacy over Leveson leaves him facing a complex parliamentary battle.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/14/cameron-press-regulation-negotiations">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 14th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/cameron-pulls-the-plug-on-press-talks-and-sets-stage-for-fight-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Royal Charter on press regulation close to being agreed &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/historic-royal-charter-on-press-regulation-close-to-being-agreed-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/historic-royal-charter-on-press-regulation-close-to-being-agreed-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The three leading political parties were last night close to signing up to a historic Royal Charter to implement the recommendations of Lord Justice Leveson on reforming regulation of the press.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 12th March 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The three leading political parties were last night close to signing up to a historic Royal Charter to implement the recommendations of Lord Justice Leveson on reforming regulation of the press.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/historic-royal-charter-on-press-regulation-close-to-being-agreed-8531760.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 12th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/historic-royal-charter-on-press-regulation-close-to-being-agreed-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A dangerous use of police force to quell protest &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/a-dangerous-use-of-police-force-to-quell-protest-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/a-dangerous-use-of-police-force-to-quell-protest-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violent disorder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Alfie Meadows ruling is a reminder of the coalition&#8217;s hypocrisy on non-violent protest.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 10th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Alfie Meadows ruling is a reminder of the coalition&#8217;s hypocrisy on non-violent protest.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/10/dangerous-police-protest-alfie-meadows">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 10th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/a-dangerous-use-of-police-force-to-quell-protest-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open up family court hearings, says senior judge &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/open-up-family-court-hearings-says-senior-judge-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/open-up-family-court-hearings-says-senior-judge-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A senior judge has made an important ruling in favour of transparency in the family courts.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 2nd March 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A senior judge has made an important ruling in favour of transparency in the family courts.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9904617/Open-up-family-court-hearings-says-senior-judge.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 2nd March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/open-up-family-court-hearings-says-senior-judge-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaigners unite against secret courts &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/campaigners-unite-against-secret-courts-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/campaigners-unite-against-secret-courts-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;An alliance of more than 100 human rights groups, legal experts and free press campaigners has called on MPs to vote against government plans for &#8216;secret courts&#8217; – branding them &#8220;a charter for cover-ups&#8221; that will seriously undermine the principles of British justice.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 3rd March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;An alliance of more than 100 human rights groups, legal experts and free press campaigners has called on MPs to vote against government plans for &#8216;secret courts&#8217; – branding them &#8220;a charter for cover-ups&#8221; that will seriously undermine the principles of British justice.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/mar/03/justice-and-security-mi5">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 3rd  March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/campaigners-unite-against-secret-courts-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court challenge over banned &#8216;ex-gay&#8217; bus advert &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/high-court-challenge-over-banned-ex-gay-bus-advert-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/high-court-challenge-over-banned-ex-gay-bus-advert-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A ban on a bus advert claiming gay people can be &#8220;cured&#8221; is to be challenged in the High Court.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 28th February 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A ban on a bus advert claiming gay people can be &#8220;cured&#8221; is to be challenged in the High Court.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-21613433">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 28th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/high-court-challenge-over-banned-ex-gay-bus-advert-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telling tales out of school: balancing public authority employees’ duties of confidentiality with their right to freedom of expression &#8211; Employment Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/telling-tales-out-of-school-balancing-public-authority-employees-duties-of-confidentiality-with-their-right-to-freedom-of-expression-employment-law-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/telling-tales-out-of-school-balancing-public-authority-employees-duties-of-confidentiality-with-their-right-to-freedom-of-expression-employment-law-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A dinner lady told a child’s parents that their daughter had been tied to a fence and whipped with a skipping rope by some other pupils, repeated the same to the press and then was dismissed for breach of confidentiality and acting in a manner likely to bring the school into disrepute. An employment tribunal [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A dinner lady told a child’s parents that their daughter had been tied to a fence and whipped with a skipping rope by some other pupils, repeated the same to the press and then was dismissed for breach of confidentiality and acting in a manner likely to bring the school into disrepute. An employment tribunal found the dismissal procedurally unfair but dismissed her whistleblowing claim and reduced her compensation for unfair dismissal on the grounds of Polkey and for contributory fault. The tribunal did not, however, determine the question of whether the claimant could lawfully be disciplined for &#8216;telling tales out of school&#8217; (as it put it).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.employment11kbw.com/2013/02/telling-tales-out-of-school-balancing-public-authority-employees%E2%80%99-duties-of-confidentiality-with-their-right-to-freedom-of-expression/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Employment Law Blog, 27th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.employment11kbw.com">www.employment11kbw.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/telling-tales-out-of-school-balancing-public-authority-employees-duties-of-confidentiality-with-their-right-to-freedom-of-expression-employment-law-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peers compromise over press regulation &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/peers-compromise-over-press-regulation-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/peers-compromise-over-press-regulation-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Peers have staged a partial climbdown in their clash with the government over the introduction of Leveson-style controls on the press.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 26th February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Peers have staged a partial climbdown in their clash with the government over the introduction of Leveson-style controls on the press.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/26/peers-compromise-press-regulation-leveson">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 26th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/peers-compromise-over-press-regulation-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill forcing papers to seek pre-publication approval is &#8216;flawed&#8217; &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bill-forcing-papers-to-seek-pre-publication-approval-is-flawed-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bill-forcing-papers-to-seek-pre-publication-approval-is-flawed-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Proposals for a new law which would require newspaper editors to seek regulatory approval for certain types of stories are flawed and should be abandoned, a number of peers have said.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Proposals for a new law which would require newspaper editors to seek regulatory approval for certain types of stories are flawed and should be abandoned, a number of peers have said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/22/bill-forcing-pre-publication-approval">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bill-forcing-papers-to-seek-pre-publication-approval-is-flawed-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICO to publish code of practice for the press on personal data processing &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/ico-to-publish-code-of-practice-for-the-press-on-personal-data-processing-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/ico-to-publish-code-of-practice-for-the-press-on-personal-data-processing-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[codes of practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ombudsmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The UK&#8217;s data protection watchdog has outlined its intention to set new guidelines for journalists on the processing of personal data for the purposes of journalism.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 21st February 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The UK&#8217;s data protection watchdog has outlined its intention to set new guidelines for journalists on the processing of personal data for the purposes of journalism.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/february/ico-to-publish-code-of-practice-for-the-press-on-personal-data-processing-/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 21st February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/ico-to-publish-code-of-practice-for-the-press-on-personal-data-processing-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Leveson: the 66-year press regulation journey that ends as it began &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/after-leveson-the-66-year-press-regulation-journey-that-ends-as-it-began-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/after-leveson-the-66-year-press-regulation-journey-that-ends-as-it-began-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In this extract from After Leveson, a book edited by John Mair, John Jewell, of the Cardiff school of journalism, takes us on the long journey that led publishers, editors, journalists and phone hacking victims to the royal courts of justice for the Leveson inquiry. His story begins 66 years ago…&#8221; Full story The Guardian, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In this extract from After Leveson, a book edited by John Mair, John Jewell, of the Cardiff school of journalism, takes us on the long journey that led publishers, editors, journalists and phone hacking victims to the royal courts of justice for the Leveson inquiry. His story begins 66 years ago…&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2013/feb/21/leveson-report-davidcameron">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/after-leveson-the-66-year-press-regulation-journey-that-ends-as-it-began-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveson report: what happened next – Q&amp;A &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/leveson-report-what-happened-next-qa-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/leveson-report-what-happened-next-qa-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;How the government has responded to Lord Justice Leveson&#8217;s recommendations on press regulation.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 12th February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How the government has responded to Lord Justice Leveson&#8217;s recommendations on press regulation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/12/leveson-what-happened-next">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 12th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/leveson-report-what-happened-next-qa-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice for dinner lady who told of school bullying &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/justice-for-dinner-lady-who-told-of-school-bullying-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/justice-for-dinner-lady-who-told-of-school-bullying-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair dismissal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A school dinner lady who was unfairly sacked after telling a seven-year-old girl’s parents that their daughter had been tied to a fence and hit with a skipping rope has won her two-year battle for compensation.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 12th February 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A school dinner lady who was unfairly sacked after telling a seven-year-old girl’s parents that their daughter had been tied to a fence and hit with a skipping rope has won her two-year battle for compensation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9865225/Justice-for-dinner-lady-who-told-of-school-bullying.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 12th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/justice-for-dinner-lady-who-told-of-school-bullying-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq war activists to get £4,000 compensation over 2003 protest &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/iraq-war-activists-to-get-4000-compensation-over-2003-protest-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/iraq-war-activists-to-get-4000-compensation-over-2003-protest-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Anti-war protesters who were prevented by police from attending a mass rally outside an RAF airbase have been awarded more than £4,000 each in compensation.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 8th February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anti-war protesters who were prevented by police from attending a mass rally outside an RAF airbase have been awarded more than £4,000 each in compensation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/08/iraq-war-compensation-police-detention">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 8th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/iraq-war-activists-to-get-4000-compensation-over-2003-protest-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAF Fairford protesters win legal battle against police &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/raf-fairford-protesters-win-legal-battle-against-police-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/raf-fairford-protesters-win-legal-battle-against-police-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Anti-war campaigners whose coaches were prevented from joining a mass rally against the Iraq war have won their legal battle against police.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 8th February 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anti-war campaigners whose coaches were prevented from joining a mass rally against the Iraq war have won their legal battle against police.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-21382889">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 8th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/raf-fairford-protesters-win-legal-battle-against-police-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trial by Google? Juries, social media and the internet &#8211; Attorney General&#8217;s Office</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/trial-by-google-juries-social-media-and-the-internet-attorney-generals-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/trial-by-google-juries-social-media-and-the-internet-attorney-generals-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strict liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC MP speaks of the challenge to jury trial posed by the internet. Originally given at University of Kent.&#8221; Full story Attorney General&#8217;s Office, 6th February 2013 Source: www.gov.uk/ago]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC MP speaks of the challenge to jury trial posed by the internet. Originally given at University of Kent.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/trial-by-google-juries-social-media-and-the-internet">Full story</a></p>
<p>Attorney General&#8217;s Office, 6th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/ago">www.gov.uk/ago</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/trial-by-google-juries-social-media-and-the-internet-attorney-generals-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (Gallastegui) v Westminster City Council and others &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/regina-gallastegui-v-westminster-city-council-and-others-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/regina-gallastegui-v-westminster-city-council-and-others-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (Gallastegui) v Westminster City Council and others [2013] EWCA Civ 28; [2013] WLR (D) 45 &#8220;Sections 143 and 145 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 were carefully targeted to prevent protesters camping with tents or sleeping equipment on Parliament Square Gardens, but did not generally impair freedom to protest at all. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-045">Regina (Gallastegui) v Westminster City Council and others [2013] EWCA Civ 28; [2013] WLR (D)  45</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Sections 143 and 145 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 were carefully targeted to prevent protesters camping with tents or sleeping equipment on Parliament Square Gardens, but did not generally impair freedom to protest at all. As a consequence they were not incompatible with the rights to freedom of expression and protest in articles 10 and 11 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Sincethe procedure set out in the 2011 Act allowed for access to a court, article 6 of the Convention was not engaged.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 30th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/regina-gallastegui-v-westminster-city-council-and-others-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter cases &#8216;threat to freedom of speech’ &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/twitter-cases-threat-to-freedom-of-speech-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/twitter-cases-threat-to-freedom-of-speech-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosecutions, said too many investigations into comments on networks such as Twitter would have a &#8216;chilling effect&#8217; on free speech. He issued his warning as he signalled that anyone who posted an offensive message but then quickly removed it could escape prosecution.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 3rd February 2013 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosecutions, said too many investigations<br />
into comments on networks such as Twitter would have a &#8216;chilling effect&#8217; on free<br />
speech. He issued his warning as he signalled that anyone who posted an<br />
offensive message but then quickly removed it could escape prosecution.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9846043/Twitter-cases-threat-to-freedom-of-speech.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 3rd February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/twitter-cases-threat-to-freedom-of-speech-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveson: Press and politicians still seek solution &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/leveson-press-and-politicians-still-seek-solution-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/leveson-press-and-politicians-still-seek-solution-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;For months, the Leveson Inquiry dominated the news, as a succession of high-profile witnesses gave evidence &#8211; actors Hugh Grant and Sienna Miller, singer Charlotte Church; the parents of Milly Dowler and Madeleine McCann; editors, proprietors, police chiefs, politicians.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 27th January 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For months, the Leveson Inquiry dominated the news, as a succession of high-profile witnesses gave evidence &#8211; actors Hugh Grant and Sienna Miller, singer Charlotte Church; the parents of Milly Dowler and Madeleine McCann; editors, proprietors, police chiefs, politicians.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21221834">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 27th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/leveson-press-and-politicians-still-seek-solution-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public insults to be legalised but grossly offensive messages still criminal &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/public-insults-to-be-legalised-but-grossly-offensive-messages-still-criminal-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/public-insults-to-be-legalised-but-grossly-offensive-messages-still-criminal-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986, which outlaws the use of &#8216;threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour&#8217; will be amended to remove the word ‘insulting’. The amendment is the result of a successful, high-profile campaign which asked &#8216;Do we really need the police and the courts to deal with insults?&#8217;&#8221; Full story [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986, which outlaws the use of &#8216;threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour&#8217; will be amended to remove the word ‘insulting’. The amendment is the result of a successful, high-profile campaign which asked &#8216;Do we really need the police and the courts to deal with insults?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/01/15/public-insults-to-be-legalised-but-grossly-offensive-messages-still-criminal/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 15th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/public-insults-to-be-legalised-but-grossly-offensive-messages-still-criminal-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Insulting words&#8217; crime ditched &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/insulting-words-crime-ditched-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/insulting-words-crime-ditched-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The crime of &#8216;insulting&#8217; someone through words or behaviour, which once led to the arrest of a student for asking a police officer whether his horse was gay, is to be dropped.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 14th January 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The crime of &#8216;insulting&#8217; someone through words or behaviour, which once led to the arrest of a student for asking a police officer whether his horse was gay, is to be dropped.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21020737">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 14th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/insulting-words-crime-ditched-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gagging order preventing Sun report on child protection scandal overturned &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/gagging-order-preventing-sun-report-on-child-protection-scandal-overturned-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/gagging-order-preventing-sun-report-on-child-protection-scandal-overturned-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fostering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Sun has won a two-month battle to overturn an injunction brought by Bristol City Council that prevented it from reporting details of a child protection scandal.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 9th January 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Sun has won a two-month battle to overturn an injunction brought by Bristol City Council that prevented it from reporting details of a child protection scandal.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/jan/09/gagging-order-sun-child-protection-overturned">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 9th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/gagging-order-preventing-sun-report-on-child-protection-scandal-overturned-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poppy burning teenager meets forces personnel in lieu of criminal charges &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/poppy-burning-teenager-meets-forces-personnel-in-lieu-of-criminal-charges-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/poppy-burning-teenager-meets-forces-personnel-in-lieu-of-criminal-charges-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restorative justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A teenager who was arrested after posting a picture of a burning poppy on Facebook has escaped charges after meeting serving and former military personnel as part of a restorative justice programme.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 20th December 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A teenager who was arrested after posting a picture of a burning poppy on Facebook has escaped charges after meeting serving and former military personnel as part of a restorative justice programme.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/dec/20/poppy-burning-teenager-meets-forces">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 20th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/poppy-burning-teenager-meets-forces-personnel-in-lieu-of-criminal-charges-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New prosecution guidance on offensive speech online: sensible, but the law is still out of date &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/new-prosecution-guidance-on-offensive-speech-online-sensible-but-the-law-is-still-out-of-date-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/new-prosecution-guidance-on-offensive-speech-online-sensible-but-the-law-is-still-out-of-date-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has published interim guidance on when to prosecute people for grossly offensive and obscene messages they send on social media. The guidelines are now subject to a full public consultation. Earlier this year, I took part in a series of round table discussions with the DPP over how the guidelines [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has published interim guidance on when to prosecute people for grossly offensive and obscene messages they send on social media. The guidelines are now subject to a full public consultation. Earlier this year, I took part in a series of round table discussions with the DPP over how the guidelines would look.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/12/19/new-prosecution-guidance-on-offensive-speech-online-sensible-but-the-law-is-still-out-of-date/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 19th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/new-prosecution-guidance-on-offensive-speech-online-sensible-but-the-law-is-still-out-of-date-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling time on Scandalising the Court &#8211; Law Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/calling-time-on-scandalising-the-court-law-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/calling-time-on-scandalising-the-court-law-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute law revision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Law Commission is recommending that the offence of scandalising the court should be abolished and not replaced.&#8221; Full story Law Commission, 19th December 2012 Source: www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Law Commission is recommending that the offence of scandalising the court should be abolished and not replaced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/news/2140.htm">Full story</a></p>
<p>Law Commission, 19th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk">www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/calling-time-on-scandalising-the-court-law-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPP launches public consultation on prosecutions involving social media communications &#8211; Crown Prosecution Service</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/dpp-launches-public-consultation-on-prosecutions-involving-social-media-communications-crown-prosecution-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/dpp-launches-public-consultation-on-prosecutions-involving-social-media-communications-crown-prosecution-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, has today published interim guidelines setting out the approach prosecutors should take in cases involving communications sent via social media.&#8221; Full story Crown Prosecution Service, 19th December 2012 Source: http://blog.cps.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, has today published interim guidelines setting out the approach prosecutors should take in cases involving communications sent via social media.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2012/12/dpp-launches-public-consultation-on-prosecutions-involving-social-media-communications-.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Crown Prosecution Service, 19th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://blog.cps.gov.uk">http://blog.cps.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/dpp-launches-public-consultation-on-prosecutions-involving-social-media-communications-crown-prosecution-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet porn: Automatic block rejected &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/internet-porn-automatic-block-rejected-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/internet-porn-automatic-block-rejected-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Ministers have rejected plans to automatically block internet access to pornography on all computers, saying the move is not widely supported.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 15th December 2012 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ministers have rejected plans to automatically block internet access to pornography on all computers, saying the move is not widely supported.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20738746">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 15th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/internet-porn-automatic-block-rejected-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
