<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; freedom of establishment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/freedom-of-establishment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Myth’ that Britain cannot ban EU doctors &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/myth-that-britain-cannot-ban-eu-doctors-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/myth-that-britain-cannot-ban-eu-doctors-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=65641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Britain is free to ban foreign doctors from working in this country if they do not speak adequate English or there are concerns over their medical ability, an EU Commissioner insists today.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 29th January 2012 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Britain is free to ban foreign doctors from working in this country if they do not speak adequate English or there are concerns over their medical ability, an EU Commissioner insists today.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/9026267/Myth-that-Britain-cannot-ban-EU-doctors.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 29th January 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/01/myth-that-britain-cannot-ban-eu-doctors-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vodafone2 v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs – Times Law Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/06/vodafone2-v-commissioners-for-revenue-and-customs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/06/vodafone2-v-commissioners-for-revenue-and-customs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[corporation tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=22644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vodafone2 v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Court of Appeal &#8220;In order to interpret United Kingdom legislation concerning the profits of controlled foreign companies in a way which avoided any unlawful restriction of a taxpayer company’s right to freedom of establishment, conferred by article 43 of the European Treaty, the court was entitled to introduce [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article6576505.ece">Vodafone2 v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs</a></p>
<p>Court of Appeal</p>
<p>&#8220;In order to interpret United Kingdom legislation concerning the profits of controlled foreign companies in a way which avoided any unlawful restriction of a taxpayer company’s right to freedom of establishment, conferred by article 43 of the European Treaty, the court was entitled to introduce an additional exception to those contained in section 748(1)(a) to (e) and (3) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Times, 26th June 2009</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk">www.timesonline.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/06/vodafone2-v-commissioners-for-revenue-and-customs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vodafone 2 v Revenue and Customs Commissioners &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/05/vodafone-2-v-revenue-and-customs-commissioners-wlr-daily-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/05/vodafone-2-v-revenue-and-customs-commissioners-wlr-daily-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[corporation tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=21533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vodafone 2 v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2009] EWCA Civ 446; [2009] WLR (D) 170 &#8220;It was possible to provide a conforming interpretation of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 which avoided any unlawful restriction on a taxpayer company’s freedom of establishment, conferred by art 43EC of the EC Treaty, by the introduction of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/Vodaphone2_v_RevCustCmrs.html">Vodafone 2 v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2009] EWCA Civ 446; [2009] WLR (D) 170</a></p>
<p>&#8220;It was possible to provide a conforming interpretation of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 which avoided any unlawful restriction on a taxpayer company’s freedom of establishment, conferred by art 43EC of the EC Treaty, by the introduction of an additional exception to those contained in s 748(1)(a) to (e) and (3) in respect of the apportionment of profits of controlled foreign companies by the additional implication of the words &#8216; if [the company] is, in that accounting period, actually established in another member state of the EEA and carries on genuine economic activities there&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 21st May 2009</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk">www.lawreports.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/05/vodafone-2-v-revenue-and-customs-commissioners-wlr-daily-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Transport Workers&#8217; Federation and Another v Viking Line ABP and Another &#8211; Times Law Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/12/international-transport-workers-federation-and-another-v-viking-line-abp-and-another-times-law-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/12/international-transport-workers-federation-and-another-v-viking-line-abp-and-another-times-law-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/international-transport-workers-federation-and-another-v-viking-line-abp-and-another-times-law-reports/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International Transport Workers&#8217; Federation and Another v Viking Line ABP and Another Court of Justice of the European Communities &#8220;The protection of workers could justify industrial action causing a restriction on freedom of establishment of a shipowner proposing to reflag the vessel for economic reasons.&#8221; The Times, 14th December 2007 Source: www.timesonline.co.uk Please note the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article3048046.ece">International Transport Workers&#8217; Federation and Another v Viking Line ABP and Another</a></p>
<p>Court of Justice of the European Communities</p>
<p>&#8220;The protection of workers could justify industrial action causing a restriction on freedom of establishment of a shipowner proposing to reflag the vessel for economic reasons.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Times, 14th December 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/">www.timesonline.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/12/international-transport-workers-federation-and-another-v-viking-line-abp-and-another-times-law-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
