<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; electronic commerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/electronic-commerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Marketplace purchases not covered by Consumer Credit Act &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/amazon-marketplace-purchases-not-covered-by-consumer-credit-act-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/amazon-marketplace-purchases-not-covered-by-consumer-credit-act-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale of goods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;If you pay Amazon and it passes the money on to the retailer, a loophole could leave you without redress.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 19th January 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you pay Amazon and it passes the money on to the retailer, a loophole could leave you without redress.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2013/jan/19/amazon-marketplace-purchases-not-covered-consumer-credit-act">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 19th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/amazon-marketplace-purchases-not-covered-by-consumer-credit-act-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RFU plans tough sanctions against ticket resellers after Supreme Court dismisses privacy concerns around disclosure &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/rfu-plans-tough-sanctions-against-ticket-resellers-after-supreme-court-dismisses-privacy-concerns-around-disclosure-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/rfu-plans-tough-sanctions-against-ticket-resellers-after-supreme-court-dismisses-privacy-concerns-around-disclosure-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A website operator must disclose the names and addresses of people who used the site to trade rugby tickets after the Supreme Court said that doing so would not be a disproportionate infringement of those individuals&#8217; privacy rights.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 22nd November 2012 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A website operator must disclose the names and addresses of people who used the site to trade rugby tickets after the Supreme Court said that doing so would not be a disproportionate infringement of those individuals&#8217; privacy rights.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/november/rfu-plans-tough-sanctions-against-ticket-resellers-after-supreme-court-dismisses-privacy-concerns-around-disclosure/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 22nd November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/rfu-plans-tough-sanctions-against-ticket-resellers-after-supreme-court-dismisses-privacy-concerns-around-disclosure-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online behavioural advertising transparency and opt out requirements to be set out in UK advertising rules &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/online-behavioural-advertising-transparency-and-opt-out-requirements-to-be-set-out-in-uk-advertising-rules-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/online-behavioural-advertising-transparency-and-opt-out-requirements-to-be-set-out-in-uk-advertising-rules-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[codes of practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Behavioural advertising networks will be subject to UK advertising rules from February next year, the advertising regulator has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 22nd November 2012 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Behavioural advertising networks will be subject to UK advertising rules from February next year, the advertising regulator has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/november/online-behavioural-advertising-transparency-and-opt-out-requirements-to-be-set-out-in-uk-advertising-rules/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 22nd November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/online-behavioural-advertising-transparency-and-opt-out-requirements-to-be-set-out-in-uk-advertising-rules-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT issues guidance to online retailers over delivering to remote areas &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/oft-issues-guidance-to-online-retailers-over-delivering-to-remote-areas-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/oft-issues-guidance-to-online-retailers-over-delivering-to-remote-areas-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Retailers should make it clear from the outset when residents of remote areas will be charged extra for delivery in online sales, consumer protection regulator the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 20th September 2012 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Retailers should make it clear from the outset when residents of remote areas will be charged extra for delivery in online sales, consumer protection regulator the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/september/oft-issues-guidance-to-online-retailers-over-delivering-to-remote-areas/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 20th September 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/09/oft-issues-guidance-to-online-retailers-over-delivering-to-remote-areas-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison websites &#8216;break the law&#8217; over disabled users &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/05/comparison-websites-break-the-law-over-disabled-users-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/05/comparison-websites-break-the-law-over-disabled-users-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=72053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;They may spend millions of pounds on advertising campaigns featuring mustachioed opera singers and cheeky meerkats, but some of the nation’s most popular comparison websites have been accused of breaking the law by denying access to more than 12m consumers with disabilities.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 7th May 2012 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They may spend millions of pounds on advertising campaigns featuring mustachioed opera singers and cheeky meerkats, but some of the nation’s most popular comparison websites have been accused of breaking the law by denying access to more than 12m consumers with disabilities.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/9246535/Comparison-websites-break-the-law-over-disabled-users.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 7th May 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/05/comparison-websites-break-the-law-over-disabled-users-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eleven people sentenced over £1m iTunes and Amazon royalties fraud &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/eleven-people-sentenced-over-1m-itunes-and-amazon-royalties-fraud-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/eleven-people-sentenced-over-1m-itunes-and-amazon-royalties-fraud-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=70027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220; Ten men and one woman including a former IT teacher have been given jail terms, suspended prison sentences and community service for their part in a £1m &#8216;fake royalties&#8217; fraud of iTunes and Amazon.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 30th March 2012 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220; Ten men and one woman including a former IT teacher have been given jail terms, suspended prison sentences and community service for their part in a £1m &#8216;fake royalties&#8217; fraud of iTunes and Amazon.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/eleven-people-sentenced-over-1m-itunes-and-amazon-royalties-fraud-7600980.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 30th March 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/eleven-people-sentenced-over-1m-itunes-and-amazon-royalties-fraud-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Channel Islands VAT loophole closed to CD and DVD retailers &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/channel-islands-vat-loophole-closed-to-cd-and-dvd-retailers-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/channel-islands-vat-loophole-closed-to-cd-and-dvd-retailers-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guernsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=68956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Some of UK&#8217;s most popular online retailers will be forced to stop selling VAT-free CDs and DVDs after high court ruling.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 15th March 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some of UK&#8217;s most popular online retailers will be forced to stop selling VAT-free CDs and DVDs after high court ruling.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/mar/15/vat-loophole-on-cds-closed">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 15th March 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/03/channel-islands-vat-loophole-closed-to-cd-and-dvd-retailers-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/11/edate-advertising-gmbh-v-x-martinez-and-another-v-mgn-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/11/edate-advertising-gmbh-v-x-martinez-and-another-v-mgn-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[choice of forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=61540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10);  [2011] WLR (D)  330 &#8220;Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2011-330">eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10);  [2011] WLR (D)  330</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was established or before the courts of the member state in which the centre of his interests was based. Under article 3 of Directive 2000/31/EC (&#8216;the E-Commerce Directive&#8217;) member states had to ensure that, subject to the derogations authorised in accordance with the conditions set out in article 3(4), the provider of an electronic commerce service was not made subject to stricter requirements than those provided for by the substantive law applicable in the member state in which that service provider was established.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 25th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/11/edate-advertising-gmbh-v-x-martinez-and-another-v-mgn-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal over legality of Digital Economy Act could be successful, judge says &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/appeal-over-legality-of-digital-economy-act-could-be-successful-judge-says-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/appeal-over-legality-of-digital-economy-act-could-be-successful-judge-says-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=60453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;BT and TalkTalk have a &#8216;real prospect of success&#8217; in arguing that the UK&#8217;s Digital Economy Act (DEA) violates EU laws on liability for communications made over the internet, a UK judge has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 31st October 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BT and TalkTalk have a &#8216;real prospect of success&#8217; in arguing that the UK&#8217;s Digital Economy Act (DEA) violates EU laws on liability for communications made over the internet, a UK judge has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2011/october/appeal-over-legality-of-digital-economy-act-could-be-successful-judge-says/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 31st October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/appeal-over-legality-of-digital-economy-act-could-be-successful-judge-says-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever happened to the Digital Economy Act? &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/whatever-happened-to-the-digital-economy-act-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/whatever-happened-to-the-digital-economy-act-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=59971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The UK&#8217;s Digital Economy Act (DEA) was meant to make pirates quake in their boots, but so far it has failed to shiver any timbers.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 21st October 2011 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The UK&#8217;s Digital Economy Act (DEA) was meant to make pirates quake in their boots, but so far it has failed to shiver any timbers.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15390021">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 21st October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/whatever-happened-to-the-digital-economy-act-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT and TalkTalk given last chance to challenge Digital Economy Act &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/bt-and-talktalk-given-last-chance-to-challenge-digital-economy-act-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/bt-and-talktalk-given-last-chance-to-challenge-digital-economy-act-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=59212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;BT and TalkTalk have been granted permission to appeal against their failed legal challenge to the Digital Economy Act, which is central to the government&#8217;s attempts to curb illegal downloading.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 7th October 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BT and TalkTalk have been granted permission to appeal against their failed legal challenge to the Digital Economy Act, which is central to the government&#8217;s attempts to curb illegal downloading.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/oct/07/bt-talktalk-digital-economy-act">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 7th October 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/10/bt-and-talktalk-given-last-chance-to-challenge-digital-economy-act-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy watchdog publishes e-privacy laws compliance guidance &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/privacy-watchdog-publishes-e-privacy-laws-compliance-guidance-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/privacy-watchdog-publishes-e-privacy-laws-compliance-guidance-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=58145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The UK&#8217;s data protection watchdog&#8217;s guidance includes amendments made to the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) in May. The changes transposed an EU Directive into national law.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 15th September 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The UK&#8217;s data protection watchdog&#8217;s guidance includes amendments made to the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) in May. The changes transposed an EU Directive into national law.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2011/september/privacy-watchdog-publishes-e-privacy-laws-compliance-guidance/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 15th September 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/privacy-watchdog-publishes-e-privacy-laws-compliance-guidance-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT investigates hidden airline charges &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/oft-investigates-hidden-airline-charges-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/oft-investigates-hidden-airline-charges-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=57798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Office of Fair Trading has launched an investigation into whether airlines are hitting customers with hidden card surcharges when they book flights online.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 8th September 2011 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Office of Fair Trading has launched an investigation into whether airlines are hitting customers with hidden card surcharges when they book flights online.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/8750210/OFT-investigates-hidden-airline-charges.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 8th September 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/09/oft-investigates-hidden-airline-charges-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review into viability of website blocking rules to be announced soon, Government says &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/review-into-viability-of-website-blocking-rules-to-be-announced-soon-government-says-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/review-into-viability-of-website-blocking-rules-to-be-announced-soon-government-says-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=54901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A report into a whether website blocking measures are viable is to be published shortly, the Culture Minister has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 11th July 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A report into a whether website blocking measures are viable is to be published shortly, the Culture Minister has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=12072&#038;lang=en-gb&#038;utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 11th July 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/07/review-into-viability-of-website-blocking-rules-to-be-announced-soon-government-says-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court orders trader to repay customers after late deliveries and failure to refund purchases &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/court-orders-trader-to-repay-customers-after-late-deliveries-and-failure-to-refund-purchases-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/court-orders-trader-to-repay-customers-after-late-deliveries-and-failure-to-refund-purchases-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=54078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A court has ordered an online trader to refund consumers that he failed to deliver goods or pay refunds to, the UK&#8217;s consumer protection regulator the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 24th June 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A court has ordered an online trader to refund consumers that he failed to deliver goods or pay refunds to, the UK&#8217;s consumer protection regulator the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=12028&#038;lang=en-gb&#038;utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 24th June 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/court-orders-trader-to-repay-customers-after-late-deliveries-and-failure-to-refund-purchases-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT and TalkTalk denied Digital Economy Act appeal &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/bt-and-talktalk-denied-digital-economy-act-appeal-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/bt-and-talktalk-denied-digital-economy-act-appeal-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=53822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;BT and TalkTalk have been refused permission to appeal against their failed legal challenge of the Digital Economy Act.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 21st June 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BT and TalkTalk have been refused permission to appeal against their failed legal challenge of the Digital Economy Act.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/21/bt-talk-talk-digital-economy-act">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st June 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/bt-and-talktalk-denied-digital-economy-act-appeal-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Act will cost nearly £6m &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/digital-economy-act-will-cost-nearly-6m-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/digital-economy-act-will-cost-nearly-6m-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=53701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Government plans to curb illicit filesharing under the Digital Economy Act will have cost rights holders, Ofcom and internet providers almost £6m by the time the controversial legislation is implemented next year, according to figures released under the Freedom of Information Act.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 17th June 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government plans to curb illicit filesharing under the Digital Economy Act will have cost rights holders, Ofcom and internet providers almost £6m by the time the controversial legislation is implemented next year, according to figures released under the Freedom of Information Act.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/17/digital-economy-act-cost">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 17th June 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/digital-economy-act-will-cost-nearly-6m-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT and TalkTalk will appeal High Court DEA ruling &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/bt-and-talktalk-will-appeal-high-court-dea-ruling-out-law-co-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/bt-and-talktalk-will-appeal-high-court-dea-ruling-out-law-co-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=52970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;BT and TalkTalk will ask the Court of Appeal to assess a UK law that could force internet service providers (ISPs) to disconnect users who infringe copyrights online. The companies say the Digital Economy Act (DEA) breaks EU laws.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 1st June 2011 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BT and TalkTalk will ask the Court of Appeal to assess a UK law that could force internet service providers (ISPs) to disconnect users who infringe copyrights online. The companies say the Digital Economy Act (DEA) breaks EU laws.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-11971">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 1st June 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/06/bt-and-talktalk-will-appeal-high-court-dea-ruling-out-law-co-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Act is proving hard to follow with real progress &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/digital-economy-act-is-proving-hard-to-follow-with-real-progress-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/digital-economy-act-is-proving-hard-to-follow-with-real-progress-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 09:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=51265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A year on from its parliamentary approval the Digital Economy Act leaves a lot to be desired, reports Jemima Kiss.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 9th May 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A year on from its parliamentary approval the Digital Economy Act leaves a lot to be desired, reports Jemima Kiss.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media-tech-law/digital-economy-act-progress">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 9th May 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/digital-economy-act-is-proving-hard-to-follow-with-real-progress-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filesharing: BT and TalkTalk fail in challenge to Digital Economy Act &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/filesharing-bt-and-talktalk-fail-in-challenge-to-digital-economy-act-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/filesharing-bt-and-talktalk-fail-in-challenge-to-digital-economy-act-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=50828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Government plans to curb illegal filesharing received a significant boost on Wednesday, as a judicial review of the controversial Digital Economy Act failed to halt the legislation.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 20th April 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government plans to curb illegal filesharing received a significant boost on Wednesday, as a judicial review of the controversial Digital Economy Act failed to halt the legislation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/20/filesharing-bt-talktalk-digital-economy-act">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 20th April 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/filesharing-bt-and-talktalk-fail-in-challenge-to-digital-economy-act-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Act: filesharing code delayed by six months &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/digital-economy-act-filesharing-code-delayed-by-six-months-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/digital-economy-act-filesharing-code-delayed-by-six-months-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[codes of practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=50283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The government&#8217;s code to clamp down on illegal filesharing will not come into force for another six months as the Digital Economy Act is held up by a high court challenge.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 5th April 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The government&#8217;s code to clamp down on illegal filesharing will not come into force for another six months as the Digital Economy Act is held up by a high court challenge.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/05/digital-economy-act-filesharing">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 5th April 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/digital-economy-act-filesharing-code-delayed-by-six-months-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Act: &#8216;rushed&#8217; anti-piracy laws delayed until 2012 &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/digital-economy-act-rushed-anti-piracy-laws-delayed-until-2012-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/digital-economy-act-rushed-anti-piracy-laws-delayed-until-2012-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=49426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government has admitted that it cannot implement legislation to curb internet piracy until spring 2012 at the earliest, as it prepares for a legal battle in the High Court.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 21st March 2011 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government has admitted that it cannot implement legislation to curb internet piracy until spring 2012 at the earliest, as it prepares for a legal battle in the High Court.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8391308/Digital-Economy-Act-rushed-anti-piracy-laws-delayed-until-2012.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 21st March 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/03/digital-economy-act-rushed-anti-piracy-laws-delayed-until-2012-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT to test e-commerce contracts for fairness – OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/02/oft-to-test-e-commerce-contracts-for-fairness-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/02/oft-to-test-e-commerce-contracts-for-fairness-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=30518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Consumer protection regulator the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has launched an investigation into whether complex contracts for goods and services are unfair to consumers. The investigation will particularly focus on online transactions.&#8221; Full story Out-Law.com, 9th February 2010 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Consumer protection regulator the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has launched an investigation into whether complex contracts for goods and services are unfair to consumers. The investigation will particularly focus on online transactions.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-10736">Full story</a></p>
<p>Out-Law.com, 9th February 2010</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/02/oft-to-test-e-commerce-contracts-for-fairness-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-commerce Regulations updated to exempt ISPs from hate speech charges – OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/01/e-commerce-regulations-updated-to-exempt-isps-from-hate-speech-charges-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/01/e-commerce-regulations-updated-to-exempt-isps-from-hate-speech-charges-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inciting religious hatred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=29533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government has published Regulations that will absolve internet service providers (ISPs) and other digital service providers of responsibility for religion or sexuality-related hate speech transmitted over their networks.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 14th January 2010 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government has published Regulations that will absolve internet service providers (ISPs) and other digital service providers of responsibility for religion or sexuality-related hate speech transmitted over their networks.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=10664">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 14th January 2010</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/01/e-commerce-regulations-updated-to-exempt-isps-from-hate-speech-charges-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government White Paper sets out changes for UK consumer law &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/07/government-white-paper-sets-out-changes-for-uk-consumer-law-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/07/government-white-paper-sets-out-changes-for-uk-consumer-law-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=23102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The UK Government will appoint a Consumer Advocate with powers to sue on behalf of consumers, the rules for selling digital downloads will change and the law of misrepresentation will be simplified, according to plans published on Thursday.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 6th July 2009 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The UK Government will appoint a Consumer Advocate with powers to sue on behalf of consumers, the rules for selling digital downloads will change and the law of misrepresentation will be simplified, according to plans published on Thursday.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-10147">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 6th July 2009</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/07/government-white-paper-sets-out-changes-for-uk-consumer-law-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Database rights are too tough on business, says expert &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/09/database-rights-are-too-tough-on-business-says-expert-out-lawcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/09/database-rights-are-too-tough-on-business-says-expert-out-lawcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=10314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The European Union&#8217;s Database Directive is too restrictive and has the opposite of the desired effect of boosting e-commerce, an intellectual property expert has warned.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 5th September 2008 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The European Union&#8217;s Database Directive is too restrictive and has the opposite of the desired effect of boosting e-commerce, an intellectual property expert has warned.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-9406">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 5th September 2008</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/09/database-rights-are-too-tough-on-business-says-expert-out-lawcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lords to rule on overseas credit card protection &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/10/lords-to-rule-on-overseas-credit-card-protection-out-lawcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/10/lords-to-rule-on-overseas-credit-card-protection-out-lawcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/10/05/lords-to-rule-on-overseas-credit-card-protection-out-lawcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A forthcoming decision by the House of Lords could seriously dent confidence in cross-border e-commerce. The Lords have been hearing arguments in the case this week.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 5th October 2007 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A forthcoming decision by the House of Lords could seriously dent confidence in cross-border e-commerce. The Lords have been hearing arguments in the case this week.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=8530">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 5th October 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/10/lords-to-rule-on-overseas-credit-card-protection-out-lawcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When e-money providers must verify identity: new guidance &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/when-e-money-providers-must-verify-identity-%e2%80%93-new-guidance-out-lawcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/when-e-money-providers-must-verify-identity-%e2%80%93-new-guidance-out-lawcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money laundering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/when-e-money-providers-must-verify-identity-%e2%80%93-new-guidance-out-lawcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG) has published draft amended guidance for electronic money. It covers products that are card-based as well as those that are entirely software-based.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 28th August 2007 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG) has published draft amended guidance for electronic money. It covers products that are card-based as well as those that are entirely software-based.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=8418">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 28th August 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/when-e-money-providers-must-verify-identity-%e2%80%93-new-guidance-out-lawcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
