<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; ecclesiastical law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/ecclesiastical-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:14:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Months of frantic lobbying expected as women bishops debate is temporarily stayed by Church of England &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/07/months-of-frantic-lobbying-expected-as-women-bishops-debate-is-temporarily-stayed-by-church-of-england-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/07/months-of-frantic-lobbying-expected-as-women-bishops-debate-is-temporarily-stayed-by-church-of-england-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church of England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=75320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220; Supporters and opponents of women bishops are gearing up for months of frantic lobbying as a potentially historic vote which might have approved legislation today was temporarily stayed following an impassioned debate on the crucial issue.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 9th July 2012 Source: www.independent.co.uk &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220; Supporters and opponents of women bishops are gearing up for months of frantic lobbying as a potentially historic vote which might have approved legislation today was temporarily stayed following an impassioned debate on the crucial issue.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/months-of-frantic-lobbying-expected-as-women-bishops-debate-is-temporarily-stayed-by-church-of-england-7924528.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 9th July 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/07/months-of-frantic-lobbying-expected-as-women-bishops-debate-is-temporarily-stayed-by-church-of-england-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church of England meeting ahead of women bishops vote &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/07/church-of-england-meeting-ahead-of-women-bishops-vote-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/07/church-of-england-meeting-ahead-of-women-bishops-vote-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church of England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=75052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Church of England&#8217;s ruling synod is meeting in York ahead of a planned vote on whether to allow women bishops.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 6th July 2012 www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Church of England&#8217;s ruling synod is meeting in York ahead of a planned vote on whether to allow women bishops.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18731136#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 6th July 2012</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/07/church-of-england-meeting-ahead-of-women-bishops-vote-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Church Measures &#8211; legislation.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-134/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-134/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 09:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=52504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Care of Cathedrals Measure 2011 Ecclesiastical Fees (Amendment) Measure 2011 Source: www.legislation.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/2011/3/enacted">Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/2011/1/enacted">Care of Cathedrals Measure 2011</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/2011/2/enacted">Ecclesiastical Fees (Amendment) Measure 2011</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk">www.legislation.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/05/recent-statutory-instruments-legislation-gov-uk-134/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vacancies in Suffragan Sees and Other Ecclesiastical Offices Measure 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/vacancies-in-suffragan-sees-and-other-ecclesiastical-offices-measure-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/vacancies-in-suffragan-sees-and-other-ecclesiastical-offices-measure-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church of England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=32137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vacancies in Suffragan Sees and Other Ecclesiastical Offices Measure 2010 published Full text of Act Source: www.opsi.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vacancies in Suffragan Sees and Other Ecclesiastical Offices Measure 2010 published</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/uk-church-measures/2010/ukcm_20100002_en_1">Full text of Act</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk">www.opsi.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/vacancies-in-suffragan-sees-and-other-ecclesiastical-offices-measure-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crown Benefices (Parish Representatives) Measure 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/crown-benefices-parish-representatives-measure-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/crown-benefices-parish-representatives-measure-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=32078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crown Benefices (Parish Representatives) Measure 2010 published Full text of Act (PDF) Source: www.opsi.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crown Benefices (Parish Representatives) Measure 2010 published</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/uk-church-measures/2010/pdf/ukcm_20100003_en.pdf">Full text of Act</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk">www.opsi.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/crown-benefices-parish-representatives-measure-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church of England (Miscellaneous Provisions) Measure 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/church-of-england-miscellaneous-provisions-measure-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/church-of-england-miscellaneous-provisions-measure-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=32076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Church of England (Miscellaneous Provisions) Measure 2010 published Full text of Act (PDF) Source: www.opsi.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Church of England (Miscellaneous Provisions) Measure 2010 published</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/uk-church-measures/2010/pdf/ukcm_20100001_en.pdf">Full text of Act</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk">www.opsi.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/03/church-of-england-miscellaneous-provisions-measure-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re St Peter’s Church, Draycott &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/03/in-re-st-peter%e2%80%99s-church-draycott-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/03/in-re-st-peter%e2%80%99s-church-draycott-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=19337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re St Peter’s Church, Draycott; [2009] WLR (D) 105 &#8220;A consistory court should not exercise its jurisdiction to authorise the sale of a font in order to carry out repairs to a church, merely on the basis of a &#8216;financial need&#8217;. The court had to be satisfied that there was a &#8216;financial emergency&#8217; which [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="bodyboldblue"><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/OTH/Mar0.1.htm">In re St Peter’s Church, Draycott; [2009] WLR (D) 105</a></span></p>
<p><span class="bodyboldblue">&#8220;<span class="bodyblue">A consistory court should not exercise its jurisdiction to authorise the sale of a font in order to carry out repairs to a church, merely on the basis of a &#8216;financial need&#8217;. The court had to be satisfied that there was a &#8216;financial emergency&#8217; which meant an immediate pressing need to carry out urgent critical work for which funds were not, or could not be made, available.&#8221;</span></span></p>
<p><span class="bodyboldblue"><span class="bodyblue">WLR Daily, 23rd March 2009</span></span></p>
<p><span class="bodyboldblue"><span class="bodyblue">Source: <a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk">www.lawreports.co.uk</a> </span></span></p>
<p><span class="bodyboldblue"><span class="bodyblue"><span class="bodyboldblue"><span class="bodyblue"><em>Please note once a case has been fully reported in once of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.</em><br />
</span></span></p>
<p><!-- .entry-content --></p>
<p></span><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/03/in-re-st-peter%e2%80%99s-church-draycott-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re Hutton Churchyard, Somerset &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/11/in-re-hutton-churchyard-somerset-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/11/in-re-hutton-churchyard-somerset-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=13929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re Hutton Churchyard, Somerset; [2008] WLR (D) 355 &#8220;Where responsibility for maintenance of closed churchyards had passed from a parish council to a local authority pursuant to s 215(3) of the Local Government Act 1972 a parish council retained sufficient interest to intervene in faculty proceedings concerning the laying flat of memorials in the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2008/CHAN/nov0.3.htm">In re Hutton Churchyard, Somerset; [2008] WLR (D) 355</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Where responsibility for maintenance of closed churchyards had passed from a parish council to a local authority pursuant to s 215(3) of the Local Government Act 1972 a parish council retained sufficient interest to intervene in faculty proceedings concerning the laying flat of memorials in the churchyards. The duty of “maintenance of the churchyard” imposed on the local authority under s 215(3) was the same as the duty to keep “in decent order” imposed on the parish council under s 215(1) of the 1972 Act. Where memorials had been laid flat this included an obligation (1) to take into account as a primary consideration the safety of memorials (2) to consider as a factor the appearance of the churchyard, but a district council was under no duty to reinstate memorials it had laid flat because of the appearance of the churchyard.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 13th November 2008</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk">www.lawreports.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/11/in-re-hutton-churchyard-somerset-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vicar accused of spitting at churchwarden faces sack &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/01/vicar-accused-of-spitting-at-churchwarden-faces-sack-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/01/vicar-accused-of-spitting-at-churchwarden-faces-sack-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/vicar-accused-of-spitting-at-churchwarden-faces-sack-the-guardian/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A vicar accused of spitting at a churchwarden and acting &#8216;like a medieval pope&#8217; faces the sack after a church court ruled he should be moved from his parish.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 25th January 2008 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A vicar accused of spitting at a churchwarden and acting &#8216;like a medieval pope&#8217; faces the sack after a church court ruled he should be moved from his parish.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jan/25/religion.world">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 25th January 2008</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/01/vicar-accused-of-spitting-at-churchwarden-faces-sack-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford &#8211; Times Law Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/10/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-times-law-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/10/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-times-law-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/10/08/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-times-law-reports/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Balancing mobile phone risks against benefits In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford Court of Appeal &#8220;In carrying out the balancing exercise necessary when considering whether to grant a faculty which would facilitate mobile telephone network coverage, it was necessary not to lose sight of the great benefits that had flowed from the introduction [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balancing mobile phone risks against benefits</p>
<p><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article2609705.ece">In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford</a></p>
<p>Court of Appeal</p>
<p>&#8220;In carrying out the balancing exercise necessary when considering whether to grant a faculty which would facilitate mobile telephone network coverage, it was necessary not to lose sight of the great benefits that had flowed from the introduction of the new technology when assessing the risk from evildoers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Times, 8th October 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/">www.timesonline.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online from 21days from the date of publication</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/10/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-times-law-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church court says yes to mobile mast &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/church-court-says-yes-to-mobile-mast-out-lawcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/church-court-says-yes-to-mobile-mast-out-lawcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/08/28/church-court-says-yes-to-mobile-mast-out-lawcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A church has been given permission to install a 3G mobile phone mast on its tower despite there being a risk that the mast will transmit pornography. An ecclesiastical appeals court has overturned an earlier order and allowed the mast&#8217;s installation.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 24th August 2007 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A church has been given permission to install a 3G mobile phone mast on its tower despite there being a risk that the mast will transmit pornography. An ecclesiastical appeals court has overturned an earlier order and allowed the mast&#8217;s installation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=8410">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 24th August 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/church-court-says-yes-to-mobile-mast-out-lawcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-wlr-daily/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford &#8220;In carrying out the balancing exercise necessary in considering whether or not to grant a faculty for the installation of telecommunications equipment it was necessary to differentiate between the effect of the installation of equipment on children and the effect on adults. Mobile phone operators had to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2007/OTH/aug0.1.htm">In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford</a></p>
<p>&#8220;In carrying out the balancing exercise necessary in considering whether or not to grant a faculty for the installation of telecommunications equipment it was necessary to differentiate between the effect of the installation of equipment on children and the effect on adults. Mobile phone operators had to ensure a reasonable response to countering the risk to children from pornography over the mobile phone network. In respect of the risk to adults, to bar something which would be of benefit to the public generally because there was a risk that some adults would be able privately to access material which many Christians and others deplored was to take an unbalanced approach.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 21st August 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/">www.lawreports.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/08/in-re-st-peter-and-st-paul-chingford-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (Gibbs) v. Bishop of Manchester &#8211; Times Law Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/04/regina-gibbs-v-bishop-of-manchester-times-law-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/04/regina-gibbs-v-bishop-of-manchester-times-law-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecclesiastical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/regina-gibbs-v-bishop-of-manchester-times-law-reports/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasonable notice is sufficient Regina (Gibbs) v. Bishop of Manchester Queen&#8217;s Bench Division &#8220;Since a lay worker in a diocese was not protected by employment legislation, his licence to serve might be revoked with no right of appeal, provided he had been given reasonable notice.&#8221; The Times, 25th April 2007 Source: www.timesonline.co.uk Please note the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasonable notice is sufficient</p>
<p><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article1700952.ece">Regina (Gibbs) v. Bishop of Manchester</a></p>
<p>Queen&#8217;s Bench Division</p>
<p>&#8220;Since a lay worker in a diocese was not protected by employment legislation, his licence to serve might be revoked with no right of appeal, provided he had been given reasonable notice.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Times, 25th April 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/">www.timesonline.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/04/regina-gibbs-v-bishop-of-manchester-times-law-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
