<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; damages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/damages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now called mvf3 Apps) and others (Appellants) v Bestnet Europe Limited and others (Respondents) &#8211; Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/vestergaard-frandsen-as-now-called-mvf3-apps-and-others-appellants-v-bestnet-europe-limited-and-others-respondents-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/vestergaard-frandsen-as-now-called-mvf3-apps-and-others-appellants-v-bestnet-europe-limited-and-others-respondents-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract of employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now called mvf3 Apps) and others (Appellants) v Bestnet Europe Limited and others (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 31 &#124; UKSC 2011/0144 (YouTube) Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCSUYUaQqbU">Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now called mvf3 Apps) and others (Appellants) v Bestnet Europe Limited and others (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 31 | UKSC 2011/0144</a> (YouTube)</p>
<p>Supreme Court, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt">www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/vestergaard-frandsen-as-now-called-mvf3-apps-and-others-appellants-v-bestnet-europe-limited-and-others-respondents-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/aaa-v-associated-newspapers-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/aaa-v-associated-newspapers-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paternity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 554; [2013] WLR (D) 189 &#8220;Where a judge at first instance had carried out the careful balancing exercise required in respect of an individual’s right of privacy and a publisher’s right of freedom of expression, an appellate court should not intervene unless the judge had erred in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-189">AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 554; [2013] WLR (D) 189</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Where a judge at first instance had carried out the careful balancing exercise required in respect of an individual’s right of privacy and a publisher’s right of freedom of expression, an appellate court should not intervene unless the judge had erred in principle, or reached a conclusion which was plainly wrong or outside the ambit of conclusions that could reasonably be reached.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 20th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/aaa-v-associated-newspapers-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interflora wins trademark case against Marks &amp; Spencer &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/interflora-wins-trademark-case-against-marks-spencer-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/interflora-wins-trademark-case-against-marks-spencer-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Marks and Spencer has lost a five-year legal battle with Interflora after it bought advertising space tied to Google searches for the flower delivery network&#8217;s name.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 21st May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Marks and Spencer has lost a five-year legal battle with Interflora after it bought advertising space tied to Google searches for the flower delivery network&#8217;s name.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/may/21/interflora-wins-trademark-case-against-marks-spencer">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/interflora-wins-trademark-case-against-marks-spencer-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspaper royal charter plans are &#8216;bizarre&#8217;, says Liberty director &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/newspaper-royal-charter-plans-are-bizarre-says-liberty-director-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/newspaper-royal-charter-plans-are-bizarre-says-liberty-director-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ombudsmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A key adviser to the Leveson report, the civil rights campaigner Shami Chakrabarti, has hit out against politicians and newspaper barons, accusing them of letting down the public over promises to set up a new press watchdog.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 21st May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A key adviser to the Leveson report, the civil rights campaigner Shami Chakrabarti, has hit out against politicians and newspaper barons, accusing them of letting down the public over promises to set up a new press watchdog.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/may/21/newspaper-royal-charter-liberty">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 21st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/newspaper-royal-charter-plans-are-bizarre-says-liberty-director-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop and Tase? &#8211; Criminal Law and Justice Weekly</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stop-and-tase-criminal-law-and-justice-weekly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stop-and-tase-criminal-law-and-justice-weekly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Last month saw the launch of the judicial review of the &#8216;Taser Roll-out Programme&#8217;. The landmark challenge comes after the Metropolitan Police Service and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) began the roll-out of Tasers across all 32 boroughs of London without holding a public consultation or providing the public with information about [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last month saw the launch of the judicial review of the &#8216;Taser Roll-out Programme&#8217;. The landmark challenge comes after the Metropolitan Police Service and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) began the roll-out of Tasers across all 32 boroughs of London without holding a public consultation or providing the public with information about the Programme. Forty officers in each borough will be trained to use the Taser; eight officers per shift and two Emergency Response Teams will have Tasers with them at any one time. The judicial review also raises the issue that there was a legitimate expectation that the &#8216;Taser Policy&#8217; across London would remain in force and that there is an arguable breach of art.2 and 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights in continuing with the implementation of the Programme.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/features/Stop-and-Tase">Full story</a></p>
<p>Criminal Law and Justice Weekly, 18th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk">www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/stop-and-tase-criminal-law-and-justice-weekly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes to Civil Procedure Rules and court costs made in April 2013 &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/changes-to-civil-procedure-rules-and-court-costs-made-in-april-2013-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/changes-to-civil-procedure-rules-and-court-costs-made-in-april-2013-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil procedure rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;From 1 April 2013 a number of changes to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPRs) governing court action in England and Wales took effect. This is a summary of those changes.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From 1 April 2013 a number of changes to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPRs) governing court action in England and Wales took effect. This is a summary of those changes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/topics/dispute-resolution-and-litigation/court-procedure/changes-to-civil-procedure-rules-and-court-costs-made-in-april-2013/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/changes-to-civil-procedure-rules-and-court-costs-made-in-april-2013-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damages under section 13 DPA: Court of Appeal’s judgment in Halliday &#8211; Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/damages-under-section-13-dpa-court-of-appeals-judgment-in-halliday-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/damages-under-section-13-dpa-court-of-appeals-judgment-in-halliday-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I blogged a while ago about the ex tempore judgment from the Court of Appeal in a potentially groundbreaking case on damages under section 13 of the DPA, namely Halliday v Creation Consumer Finance [2013] EWCA Civ 333. The point of potential importance was that ‘nominal damages’ appeared to suffice for the purposes of section [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I blogged a while ago about the ex tempore judgment from the Court of Appeal in a potentially groundbreaking case on damages under section 13 of the DPA, namely Halliday v Creation Consumer Finance [2013] EWCA Civ 333. The point of potential importance was that ‘nominal damages’ appeared to suffice for the purposes of section 13(1), thereby opening up section 13(2). In short, the point is that claimants under the DPA cannot be compensated for distress unless they have also suffered financial harm. A ‘nominal damages’ approach to the concept of financial harm threatened to make the DPA’s compensation regime dramatically more claimant-friendly.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com/2013/05/17/damages-under-section-13-dpa-court-of-appeals-judgment-in-halliday/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Panopticon, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com">www.panopticonblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/damages-under-section-13-dpa-court-of-appeals-judgment-in-halliday-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Button Moon creator Ian Allen wins court copyright fight &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/button-moon-creator-ian-allen-wins-court-copyright-fight-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/button-moon-creator-ian-allen-wins-court-copyright-fight-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The creator of children&#8217;s TV show Button Moon has won a damages claim against a businessman he said copied his designs on T-shirts and mugs.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 17th May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The creator of children&#8217;s TV show Button Moon has won a damages claim against a businessman he said copied his designs on T-shirts and mugs.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-22573733">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/button-moon-creator-ian-allen-wins-court-copyright-fight-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loveridge v Lambeth London Borough Council &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/loveridge-v-lambeth-london-borough-council-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/loveridge-v-lambeth-london-borough-council-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord & tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repossession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loveridge v Lambeth London Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 494; [2013] WLR (D) 173 &#8220;The valuation required by section 28(1) of the Housing Act 1988, in respect of damages for unlawful eviction under section 27, required that the propensity for the rights of a tenant of a local authority to change from those of a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-173">Loveridge v Lambeth London Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 494; [2013] WLR (D) 173</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The valuation required by section 28(1) of the Housing Act 1988, in respect of damages for unlawful eviction under section 27, required that the propensity for the rights of a tenant of a local authority to change from those of a secure tenant to those of an assured tenant on a sale of the reversion to a private landlord was to be factored into the hypothetical valuation of the landlord’s interest subject to the tenant’s rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 10th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/loveridge-v-lambeth-london-borough-council-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sun on Sunday pays damages to man wrongly linked to serial killer &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/sun-on-sunday-pays-damages-to-man-wrongly-linked-to-serial-killer-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/sun-on-sunday-pays-damages-to-man-wrongly-linked-to-serial-killer-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Sun on Sunday ran a front page &#8216;world exclusive&#8217; last November headlined &#8216;I&#8217;m Fred West&#8217;s love child&#8217;.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 13th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Sun on Sunday ran a front page &#8216;world exclusive&#8217; last November headlined &#8216;I&#8217;m Fred West&#8217;s love child&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2013/may/13/sun-on-sunday-medialaw">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 13th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/sun-on-sunday-pays-damages-to-man-wrongly-linked-to-serial-killer-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramsey: costs management limits being reviewed &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ramsey-costs-management-limits-being-reviewed-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ramsey-costs-management-limits-being-reviewed-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 10:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The £2m limit above which commercial cases are not subject to automatic costs management is being reviewed, the judge in charge of Jackson implementation has revealed, while also hinting that pre-issue costs may come within costs management in future.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 13th May 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The £2m limit above which commercial cases are not subject to automatic costs management is being reviewed, the judge in charge of Jackson implementation has revealed, while also hinting that pre-issue costs may come within costs management in future.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/ramsey-costs-management-limits-reviewed">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 13th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/ramsey-costs-management-limits-being-reviewed-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPc&#8217;s cut thumb will cost force £100,000 &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/wpcs-cut-thumb-will-cost-force-100000-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/wpcs-cut-thumb-will-cost-force-100000-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 09:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health & safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Taxpayers were last night facing a legal bill of at least £100,000 after a long-standing compensation row involving a female police officer who cut her thumb while on duty.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 10th May 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Taxpayers were last night facing a legal bill of at least £100,000 after a long-standing compensation row involving a female police officer who cut her thumb while on duty.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10046648/WPcs-cut-thumb-will-cost-force-100000.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 10th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/wpcs-cut-thumb-will-cost-force-100000-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solicitor James Watson attacks police &#8216;vendetta&#8217; &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/solicitor-james-watson-attacks-police-vendetta-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/solicitor-james-watson-attacks-police-vendetta-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 09:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false imprisonment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perverting the course of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A defence solicitor who secured more than £500,000 in damages from a police force after he was wrongly arrested says officers mounted a &#8216;vendetta&#8217; against him.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 11th May 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A defence solicitor who secured more than £500,000 in damages from a police force after he was wrongly arrested says officers mounted a &#8216;vendetta&#8217; against him.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/solicitor-james-watson-attacks-police-vendetta-8612061.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 11th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: www.independent.co.uk </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/solicitor-james-watson-attacks-police-vendetta-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice and another; Regina (Sturnham) v Parole Board and another &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-faulkner-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-and-another-regina-sturnham-v-parole-board-and-another-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-faulkner-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-and-another-regina-sturnham-v-parole-board-and-another-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imprisonment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice and another; Regina (Sturnham) v Parole Board and another [2013] UKSC 23; [2013] WLR (D) 162 &#8220;Where it was established on a balance of probabilities that a delay in holding a hearing before the Parole Board, in violation of art 5.4 of the Convention for the Protection [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-162">Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice and another; Regina (Sturnham) v Parole Board and another [2013] UKSC 23;  [2013] WLR (D)  162</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Where it was established on a balance of probabilities that a delay in holding a hearing before the Parole Board, in violation of art 5.4 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, had resulted in the detention of a prisoner beyond the date when he would otherwise have been released, damages should ordinarily be awarded as compensation for the resultant detention.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 1st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/regina-faulkner-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-and-another-regina-sturnham-v-parole-board-and-another-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Met Police pay libel damages to riots &#8216;Good Samaritan&#8217; &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/met-police-pay-libel-damages-to-riots-good-samaritan-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/met-police-pay-libel-damages-to-riots-good-samaritan-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Metropolitan Police is to pay substantial damages to a man who was wrongly pictured in &#8216;wanted&#8217; posters following the London riots in 2011.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 3rd May 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Metropolitan Police is to pay substantial damages to a man who was wrongly<br />
pictured in &#8216;wanted&#8217; posters following the London riots in 2011.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-22399150#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 3rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/met-police-pay-libel-damages-to-riots-good-samaritan-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidance from the Supreme Court on human rights damages &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/guidance-from-the-supreme-court-on-human-rights-damages-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/guidance-from-the-supreme-court-on-human-rights-damages-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Faulkner, R (on the application of ) v Secretary of State for Justice and another [2013] UKSC 23. The Supreme Court has taken a fresh look at what is meant by the Human Rights Act exhortation to take Strasbourg jurisprudence &#8216;into account&#8217; when fashioning remedies for violations of Convention rights, in this case the right [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Faulkner, R (on the application of ) v Secretary of State for Justice and another [2013] UKSC 23. The Supreme Court has taken a fresh look at what is meant by the Human Rights Act exhortation to take Strasbourg jurisprudence &#8216;into account&#8217; when fashioning remedies for violations of Convention rights, in this case the right not to be arbitrarily detained under Article 5.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/05/02/guidance-from-the-supreme-court-on-human-rights-damages/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 2nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/guidance-from-the-supreme-court-on-human-rights-damages-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An introduction to qualified one way costs shifting: New CPR 44.13-17 &#8211; Hardwicke Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/an-introduction-to-qualified-one-way-costs-shifting-new-cpr-44-13-17-hardwicke-chambers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/an-introduction-to-qualified-one-way-costs-shifting-new-cpr-44-13-17-hardwicke-chambers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil procedure rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In &#8216;part-payment&#8217; for the loss of recoverability of the CFA success fee, Lord Justice Jackson gave Claimants a 10% uplift on general damages, which was enacted in rather peculiar fashion by the Court of Appeal in Simmons v Castle by means that can only be described as &#8216;judicial legislating&#8217;.&#8221; Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 19th April [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In &#8216;part-payment&#8217; for the loss of recoverability of the CFA success fee, Lord Justice Jackson gave Claimants a 10% uplift on general damages, which was enacted in rather peculiar fashion by the Court of Appeal in Simmons v Castle by means that can only be described as &#8216;judicial legislating&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hardwicke.co.uk/insights/articles/an-introduction-to-qualified-one-way-costs-shifting-new-cpr-4413-17">Full story</a></p>
<p>Hardwicke Chambers, 19th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.hardwicke.co.uk">www.hardwicke.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/an-introduction-to-qualified-one-way-costs-shifting-new-cpr-44-13-17-hardwicke-chambers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can the courts manage the Facebook phenomenon? &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/how-can-the-courts-manage-the-facebook-phenomenon-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/how-can-the-courts-manage-the-facebook-phenomenon-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In this somewhat chaotic action, the Plaintiff sued ten defendants, in anonymised form by her father and next friend.&#8221; Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 24th April 2013 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In this somewhat chaotic action, the Plaintiff sued ten defendants, in anonymised form by her father and next friend.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/04/24/how-can-the-courts-manage-the-facebook-phenomenon/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 24th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/how-can-the-courts-manage-the-facebook-phenomenon-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dale Farm protester awarded damages &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/dale-farm-protester-awarded-damages-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/dale-farm-protester-awarded-damages-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false imprisonment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A protester arrested at the Dale Farm traveller eviction will receive undisclosed damages after she complained she was left in a police van for too long.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 23rd April 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A protester arrested at the Dale Farm traveller eviction will receive undisclosed damages after she complained she was left in a police van for too long.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10012010/Dale-Farm-protester-awarded-damages.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 23rd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/dale-farm-protester-awarded-damages-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teacher wins right to have dropped allegation removed from criminal record checks &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/teacher-wins-right-to-have-dropped-allegation-removed-from-criminal-record-checks-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/teacher-wins-right-to-have-dropped-allegation-removed-from-criminal-record-checks-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[criminal records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A police force unlawfully infringed a physical education teacher&#8217;s human rights by refusing to remove detail of an 18-year-old woman&#8217;s harassment allegation from a &#8216;criminal record certificate&#8217; available to potential employers, a High Court judge has ruled.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 22nd April 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A police force unlawfully infringed a physical education teacher&#8217;s human rights by refusing to remove detail of an 18-year-old woman&#8217;s harassment allegation from a &#8216;criminal record certificate&#8217; available to potential employers, a High Court judge has ruled.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/teacher-wins-right-to-have-dropped-allegation-removed-from-criminal-record-checks-8582669.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 22nd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/teacher-wins-right-to-have-dropped-allegation-removed-from-criminal-record-checks-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cutting to the chase &#8211; New Law Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/cutting-to-the-chase-new-law-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/cutting-to-the-chase-new-law-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal injuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Jackson and associated reforms in civil court procedure are largely now in place. Extended &#8216;tracks&#8217; and &#8216;portals&#8217;, reduced fixed fees, costs budgeting and non-recoverability of success fees will force lawyers to take a close look at the costs incurred in presenting an injury claim and how most efficiently to put the claim together. The [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Jackson and associated reforms in civil court procedure are largely now in place. Extended &#8216;tracks&#8217; and &#8216;portals&#8217;, reduced fixed fees, costs budgeting and non-recoverability of success fees will force lawyers to take a close look at the costs incurred in presenting an injury claim and how most efficiently to put the claim together. The medical report is essential, providing the foundations of much of the claim.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/cutting-chase">Full story</a></p>
<p>New Law Journal, 19th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk">www.newlawjournal.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/cutting-to-the-chase-new-law-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court awards anonymity for victim of libellous “paedophile” allegations &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/court-awards-anonymity-for-victim-of-libellous-paedophile-allegations-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/court-awards-anonymity-for-victim-of-libellous-paedophile-allegations-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blackmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The permanent damage that internet publications can inflict is very much the focus of Tugendhat J’s assessment of damages in this case, encapsulated in the memorable description he quoted in an earlier judgment: &#8216;what is to be found on the internet may become like a tattoo&#8217;.&#8221; Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 21st April 2013 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The permanent damage that internet publications can inflict is very much the focus of Tugendhat J’s assessment of damages in this case, encapsulated in the memorable description he quoted in an earlier judgment: &#8216;what is to be found on the internet may become like a tattoo&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/04/21/18091/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 21st April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/court-awards-anonymity-for-victim-of-libellous-paedophile-allegations-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phone hacking: NoW publisher pays damages to Neil Hamilton &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/phone-hacking-now-publisher-pays-damages-to-neil-hamilton-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/phone-hacking-now-publisher-pays-damages-to-neil-hamilton-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Reality TV star Jady Goody&#8217;s estate, former Conservative MP Neil Hamilton and his wife Christine and a former aide to Tony Blair are among eight of the latest claimants to settle their cases against News of the World for phone hacking.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 19th April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reality TV star Jady Goody&#8217;s estate, former Conservative MP Neil Hamilton and his wife Christine and a former aide to Tony Blair are among eight of the latest claimants to settle their cases against News of the World for phone hacking.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/apr/19/phone-hacking-news-of-the-world-damages">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 19th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/phone-hacking-now-publisher-pays-damages-to-neil-hamilton-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Private Trusts and the Court of Protection &#8211; No. 5 Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/private-trusts-and-the-court-of-protection-no-5-chambers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/private-trusts-and-the-court-of-protection-no-5-chambers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Court of Protection has jurisdiction over the property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity to make decisions for themselves. Among its various roles the Court is responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of enduring powers of attorney (“EPA”), and Lasting Powers of Attorney (&#8216;LPA&#8217;), appointing new trustees, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Court of Protection has jurisdiction over the property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity to make decisions for themselves. Among its various roles the Court is responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of enduring powers of attorney (“EPA”), and Lasting Powers of Attorney (&#8216;LPA&#8217;), appointing new trustees, authorising certain gifts and making statutory wills.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.no5.com/news-and-publications/publications/203-private-trusts-and-the-court-of-protection/">Full story</a></p>
<p>No. 5 Chambers, 4th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.no5.com">www.no5.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/private-trusts-and-the-court-of-protection-no-5-chambers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts can use hypothetical licensing arrangements to calculate trade mark damages, says High Court &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/courts-can-use-hypothetical-licensing-arrangements-to-calculate-trade-mark-damages-says-high-court-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/courts-can-use-hypothetical-licensing-arrangements-to-calculate-trade-mark-damages-says-high-court-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Courts can calculate trade mark infringement damages based on a hypothetical licensing arrangement, the High Court has said.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 17th April 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Courts can calculate trade mark infringement damages based on a hypothetical licensing arrangement, the High Court has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/april/courts-can-use-hypothetical-licensing-arrangements-to-calculate-trade-mark-damages-says-high-court-/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 17th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/courts-can-use-hypothetical-licensing-arrangements-to-calculate-trade-mark-damages-says-high-court-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sally Bercow faces first high court hearing in Twitter libel battle &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/sally-bercow-faces-first-high-court-hearing-in-twitter-libel-battle-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/sally-bercow-faces-first-high-court-hearing-in-twitter-libel-battle-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Sally Bercow, the wife of the Commons speaker, faces her first high court hearing next week as part of the libel battle with Lord McAlpine over an allegedly defamatory Twitter message.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 12th April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sally Bercow, the wife of the Commons speaker, faces her first high court hearing next week as part of the libel battle with Lord McAlpine over an allegedly defamatory Twitter message.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/apr/12/sally-bercow-twitter-libel-battle">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 12th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/sally-bercow-faces-first-high-court-hearing-in-twitter-libel-battle-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damages-based agreements &#8211; Are you at risk of being sued? &#8211; Hardwicke Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/damages-based-agreements-are-you-at-risk-of-being-sued-hardwicke-chambers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/damages-based-agreements-are-you-at-risk-of-being-sued-hardwicke-chambers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undersettlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Damages-Based Agreements (&#8216;DBAs&#8217;) became lawful on 1 April 2013 thanks to the Jackson reforms and more particularly the Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2013. A DBA is a contingency fee arrangement whereby the lawyers can take a percentage of the damages (up to a maximum of 25% in personal injury cases, 35% in employment cases and 50% [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Damages-Based Agreements (&#8216;DBAs&#8217;) became lawful on 1 April 2013 thanks to the Jackson reforms and more particularly the Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2013. A DBA is a contingency fee arrangement whereby the lawyers can take a percentage of the damages (up to a maximum of 25% in personal injury cases, 35% in employment cases and 50% in most other cases).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hardwicke.co.uk/insights/articles/damages-based-agreements---are-you-at-risk-of-being-sued">Full story</a></p>
<p>Hardwicke Chambers, 2nd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.hardwicke.co.uk">www.hardwicke.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/damages-based-agreements-are-you-at-risk-of-being-sued-hardwicke-chambers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former lady of Blarney Castle wins damages after being branded &#8216;psycho&#8217; &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/former-lady-of-blarney-castle-wins-damages-after-being-branded-psycho-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/former-lady-of-blarney-castle-wins-damages-after-being-branded-psycho-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The former wife of the owner of Blarney Castle, where the Blarney Stone is kept, has won damages at the High Court after being branded as a &#8216;psycho&#8217; who should be avoided.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 10th April 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk The Daily Telegraph have recently introduced a limited paywall. Users will be permitted to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The former wife of the owner of Blarney Castle, where the Blarney Stone is kept, has won damages at the High Court after being branded as a &#8216;psycho&#8217; who should be avoided.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9985544/Former-lady-of-Blarney-Castle-wins-damages-after-being-branded-psycho.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 10th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>The Daily Telegraph have recently introduced a limited paywall. Users will be permitted to view 20 Daily Telegraph articles per month for free, after which they will need to pay a subscription fee to access content.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/former-lady-of-blarney-castle-wins-damages-after-being-branded-psycho-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, suspects are sometimes innocent &#8211; but secret arrests are not the answer &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/yes-suspects-are-sometimes-innocent-but-secret-arrests-are-not-the-answer-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/yes-suspects-are-sometimes-innocent-but-secret-arrests-are-not-the-answer-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Senior judges support a blanket ban on naming defendants, but public must understand there can be smoke without fire.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 10th April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Senior judges support a blanket ban on naming defendants, but public must understand there can be smoke without fire.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/apr/10/secret-arrests-not-answer">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 10th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/yes-suspects-are-sometimes-innocent-but-secret-arrests-are-not-the-answer-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Albion v Dwr Cymru: Incompetence and counterfactuals &#8211; Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/albion-v-dwr-cymru-incompetence-and-counterfactuals-competition-bulletin-from-blackstone-chambers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/albion-v-dwr-cymru-incompetence-and-counterfactuals-competition-bulletin-from-blackstone-chambers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Competition Appeal Tribunal today delivered that rarest of beasts: a judgment awarding damages in a follow-on claim. After its decade-long fight, Albion Water has been awarded around £2 million for Dŵr Cymru’s abuse of dominant position in relation to the price it was prepared to charge Albion for the use of its water pipes.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Competition Appeal Tribunal today delivered that rarest of beasts: a judgment awarding damages in a follow-on claim. After its decade-long fight, Albion Water has been awarded around £2 million for Dŵr Cymru’s abuse of dominant position in relation to the price it was prepared to charge Albion for the use of its water pipes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://competitionbulletin.com/2013/03/28/albion-v-dwr-cymru-incompetence-and-counterfactuals/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers, 28th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.competitionbulletin.com">www.competitionbulletin.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/albion-v-dwr-cymru-incompetence-and-counterfactuals-competition-bulletin-from-blackstone-chambers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson reforms: trials and tribulation &#8211; Law Society&#8217;s Gazette</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/jackson-reforms-trials-and-tribulation-law-societys-gazette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/jackson-reforms-trials-and-tribulation-law-societys-gazette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;One could be forgiven for thinking the campaign to halt or defer the main planks of the civil justice reforms devised by Sir Rupert Jackson is still in full swing. To be fair to the refusniks, the impression that all was not settled has been given in part by the last-minute approach the Ministry of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One could be forgiven for thinking the campaign to halt or defer the main planks of the civil justice reforms devised by Sir Rupert Jackson is still in full swing. To be fair to the refusniks, the impression that all was not settled has been given in part by the last-minute approach the Ministry of Justice has taken to issuing details on implementation. If the government and the senior judiciary had yet to say what was to come on, respectively, damages-based agreements and big-ticket costs budgeting, perhaps they were still open to persuasion?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/features/jackson-reforms-trials-and-tribulation">Full story</a></p>
<p>Law Society&#8217;s Gazette, 25th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk">www.lawgazette.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/jackson-reforms-trials-and-tribulation-law-societys-gazette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swift v Secretary of State for Justice &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/swift-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/swift-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193; [2013] WLR (D) 118 &#8220;The exclusion of a person, cohabiting for less than two years with another who had subsequently died, from the classes of family members entitled to claim damages for loss of dependency under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, as amended, was [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-118">Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193; [2013] WLR (D) 118</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The exclusion of a person, cohabiting for less than two years with another who had subsequently died, from the classes of family members entitled to claim damages for loss of dependency under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, as amended, was a proportionate means of pursuing the legitimate legislative aim of confining the right to recovery to those who had relationships of some degree of permanence and dependence. Accordingly, section 1(3)(b) of the 1976 Act, as substituted by section 3(1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1982, was not incompatible with article 14, in conjunction with article 8, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the choice made by the legislature was not manifestly without foundation and was one Parliament was entitled to make. And even if the section amounted to an interference with the right to respect for family life in breach of article 8.1, the interference was justified under article 8.2.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 18th March 2013</p>
<p>Source:<a href="http:// www.iclr.co.uk"> www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/swift-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs likely to be excluded from press reforms by House of Lords &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/blogs-likely-to-be-excluded-from-press-reforms-by-house-of-lords-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/blogs-likely-to-be-excluded-from-press-reforms-by-house-of-lords-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Fears that bloggers and small-scale news websites will be dragged into the new proposed system of press regulation, so facing crippling costs, appeared to be lifting on Friday when Labour and the Liberal Democrats agreed to table last-minute amendments in the Lords to make it clear they will be excluded.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fears that bloggers and small-scale news websites will be dragged into the new proposed system of press regulation, so facing crippling costs, appeared to be lifting on Friday when Labour and the Liberal Democrats agreed to table last-minute amendments in the Lords to make it clear they will be excluded.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/22/blogs-excluded-press-reforms-lords">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/blogs-likely-to-be-excluded-from-press-reforms-by-house-of-lords-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent ordered to pay damages for Nazi war criminal error &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/independent-ordered-to-pay-damages-for-nazi-war-criminal-error-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/independent-ordered-to-pay-damages-for-nazi-war-criminal-error-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war crimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Croatian actor has accepted substantial undisclosed libel damages over an article in the Independent which wrongly identified him as a Nazi war criminal.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Croatian actor has accepted substantial undisclosed libel damages over an article in the Independent which wrongly identified him as a Nazi war criminal.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/22/independent-damages-nazi-war0criminal-error">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/independent-ordered-to-pay-damages-for-nazi-war-criminal-error-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damages-Based Agreements: potential or  potential pitfall? &#8211; 11 Stone Buildings</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/damages-based-agreements-potential-or-potential-pitfall-11-stone-buildings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/damages-based-agreements-potential-or-potential-pitfall-11-stone-buildings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;As part of the Jackson Reforms the much talked about Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2013 come into force on 1st April 2013. Damages Based agreements (&#8216;DBAs&#8217;) open up the prospect of fees becoming entirely divorced from the actual hours worked on a case. This can lead to much higher fees than those which will arise using [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As part of the Jackson Reforms the much talked about Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2013 come into force on 1st April 2013. Damages Based agreements (&#8216;DBAs&#8217;) open up the prospect of fees becoming entirely divorced from the actual hours worked on a case. This can lead to much higher fees than those which will arise using the hour-based method, even on a CFA with a 100% uplift. However, there are some potentially serious implications to consider. Don McCue takes a closer look at the potential impact of using DBAs, how they compare to Conditional Fee Agreements (&#8216;CFAs&#8217;) in different litigation scenarios, and how DBAs relate to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (&#8216;SRA&#8217;) Code of Conduct.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.11sb.com/pdf/insider-dbas-dmc-march-2013.pdf?500%3bhttp%3a%2f%2fwww.11sb.com%3a80%2fhome%2fhome.asp">Full story</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>11 Stone Buildings, March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.11sb.com">www.11sb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/damages-based-agreements-potential-or-potential-pitfall-11-stone-buildings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press regulation: publishers may have grounds for legal challenge &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/press-regulation-publishers-may-have-grounds-for-legal-challenge-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/press-regulation-publishers-may-have-grounds-for-legal-challenge-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Newspapers likely to take action over regulations that will require huge payouts when stories are wrong.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 19th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Newspapers likely to take action over regulations that will require huge payouts when stories are wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/19/press-regulation-pressandpublishing">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 19th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/press-regulation-publishers-may-have-grounds-for-legal-challenge-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vehicle Control Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/vehicle-control-services-ltd-v-revenue-and-customs-comrs-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/vehicle-control-services-ltd-v-revenue-and-customs-comrs-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Revenue & Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vehicle Control Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs: [2013] EWCA Civ 186;   [2013] WLR (D)  105 &#8220;A taxpayer company which entered into a contract with owners or lawful occupiers of car parks or land to provide parking control services, and levied parking penalty charges on motorists for breach of the particular car park’s rules [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2013-105">Vehicle Control Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs: [2013] EWCA Civ 186;   [2013] WLR (D)  105</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A taxpayer company which entered into a contract with owners or lawful occupiers of car parks or land to provide parking control services, and levied parking penalty charges on motorists for breach of the particular car park’s rules by issuing a charge notice against a motorist in breach, was entitled to claim that the charges amounted to damages for breach of contract made between the taxpayer and the motorist or damages for trespass; and the taxpayer was therefore not liable to pay VAT on those charges.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 13th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/vehicle-control-services-ltd-v-revenue-and-customs-comrs-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damages for death and human rights &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/damages-for-death-and-human-rights-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/damages-for-death-and-human-rights-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declarations of incompatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Swift v. Secretary of State for Justice, Court of Appeal, 18 February 2013. Ms Swift lost her live-in partner in an accident at work caused by negligence. She was pregnant with her partner’s child, but had only been living with him for 6 months. Had she been with him for 2 years, she could have [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Swift v. Secretary of State for Justice, Court of Appeal, 18 February 2013. Ms Swift lost her live-in partner in an accident at work caused by negligence. She was pregnant with her partner’s child, but had only been living with him for 6 months. Had she been with him for 2 years, she could have claimed damages for his death under section 1(3) of the Fatal Accidents Act – set out at [1] of the CA judgment. She would then have been a &#8216;dependant&#8217; as defined under the FAA. So she argued that her rights under Articles 8 (family) and 14 (discrimination) of the ECHR were not properly respected by the law governing damages for the death of a relative – there was no justification for this stark cut-off – 1 year 11 months no claim, 2 years a claim. The judge refused to grant a declaration of incompatibility between the ECHR and the Fatal Accidents Act, and the Court of Appeal has just upheld his decision.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/18/damages-for-death-and-human-rights/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 18th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/damages-for-death-and-human-rights-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court of Appeal rules on damages for frustration at DPA breach &#8211; Panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/court-of-appeal-rules-on-damages-for-frustration-at-dpa-breach-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/court-of-appeal-rules-on-damages-for-frustration-at-dpa-breach-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;On a day in which the remedying of privacy breaches of the kind considered by Leveson LJ dominated parliamentary debate, the Court of Appeal (Arden LJ, Lloyd LJ and Ryder J) delivered an interesting judgment on remedies for privacy breaches of the data protection variety.&#8221; Full story Panopticon, 18th March 2013 Source: www.panopticonblog.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On a day in which the remedying of privacy breaches of the kind considered by Leveson LJ dominated parliamentary debate, the Court of Appeal (Arden LJ, Lloyd LJ and Ryder J) delivered an interesting judgment on remedies for privacy breaches of the data protection variety.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com/2013/03/18/court-of-appeal-rules-on-damages-for-frustration-at-dpa-breach/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Panopticon, 18th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.panopticonblog.com/">www.panopticonblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/court-of-appeal-rules-on-damages-for-frustration-at-dpa-breach-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labour MP given &#8216;substantial damages&#8217; after Sun accessed text messages &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/labour-mp-given-substantial-damages-after-sun-accessed-text-messages-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/labour-mp-given-substantial-damages-after-sun-accessed-text-messages-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh has accepted &#8216;very substantial damages&#8217; from News International, with the Sun admitting that it accessed text messages from her mobile phone after it was stolen, the high court has heard.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 18th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh has accepted &#8216;very substantial damages&#8217; from News International, with the Sun admitting that it accessed text messages from her mobile phone after it was stolen, the high court has heard.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/18/labour-mp-damages-sun-accessed-texts">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 18th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/labour-mp-given-substantial-damages-after-sun-accessed-text-messages-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facilitating the Return of Abducted Children &#8211; The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights &#8211; Family Law Week</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/facilitating-the-return-of-abducted-children-the-judgment-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-family-law-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/facilitating-the-return-of-abducted-children-the-judgment-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-family-law-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Esther Lieu, a Pupil at Coram Chambers, and Adam Weiss, Legal Director, The AIRE Centre, explain the ECtHR&#8217;s recent decision in Raw v France which considered, amongst other matters, the enforcement of court orders and the circumstances in which a parent could represent their children in Strasbourg proceedings.&#8221; Full story Family Law Week, 18th March [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Esther Lieu, a Pupil at Coram Chambers, and Adam Weiss, Legal Director, The AIRE Centre, explain the ECtHR&#8217;s recent decision in Raw v France which considered, amongst other matters, the enforcement of court orders and the circumstances in which a parent could represent their children in Strasbourg proceedings.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed112500">Full story</a></p>
<p>Family Law Week, 18th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.familylawweek.com">www.familylawweek.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/facilitating-the-return-of-abducted-children-the-judgment-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-family-law-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carmarthenshire blogger loses libel case against council chief &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/carmarthenshire-blogger-loses-libel-case-against-council-chief-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/carmarthenshire-blogger-loses-libel-case-against-council-chief-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A blogger who sued a council chief executive for libel says she is &#8216;absolutely devastated&#8217; after losing the case and being told to pay him £25,000 damages when he counter-sued.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 15th March 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A blogger who sued a council chief executive for libel says she is &#8216;absolutely devastated&#8217; after losing the case and being told to pay him £25,000 damages when he counter-sued.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-21798153#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 15th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/carmarthenshire-blogger-loses-libel-case-against-council-chief-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Couple falsely accused of child abuse win damages from Haringey council &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/couple-falsely-accused-of-child-abuse-win-damages-from-haringey-council-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/couple-falsely-accused-of-child-abuse-win-damages-from-haringey-council-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Two experienced senior social workers who were plunged into a &#8216;nightmare&#8217; after officials unlawfully investigated them over false allegations they had ill-treated their young daughter have won damages in the high court.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 14th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Two experienced senior social workers who were plunged into a &#8216;nightmare&#8217; after officials unlawfully investigated them over false allegations they had ill-treated their young daughter have won damages in the high court.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/mar/14/couple-accused-of-child-abuse-win-damages">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 14th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/couple-falsely-accused-of-child-abuse-win-damages-from-haringey-council-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Gear up before Top Judges &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/top-gear-up-before-top-judges-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/top-gear-up-before-top-judges-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 09:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious falsehood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[striking out]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Court of Appeal has refused an appeal against the strike out of a libel claim against the BBC in relation to a review of an electric sports car by the &#8216;Top Gear&#8217; programme. The judge below had been correct in concluding that there was no sufficient prospect of the manufacturer recovering a substantial sum [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Court of Appeal has refused an appeal against the strike out of a libel claim against the BBC in relation to a review of an electric sports car by the &#8216;Top Gear&#8217; programme. The judge below had been correct in concluding that there was no sufficient prospect of the manufacturer recovering a substantial sum of damages such as to justify continuing the case to trial.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/03/06/top-gear-up-before-top-judges/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 6th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/top-gear-up-before-top-judges-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collective actions and access to justice &#8211; Legal Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/collective-actions-and-access-to-justice-legal-voice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/collective-actions-and-access-to-justice-legal-voice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Government recently confirmed its intention to introduce ‘collective actions’ in the UK for competition law. Not only should this enable large numbers of consumers and small businesses to obtain redress against anti-competitive behaviour, but an important by-product is that leftover damages could benefit access to justice more generally.&#8221; Full story Legal Voice, 1st March [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Government recently confirmed its intention to introduce ‘collective actions’ in the UK for competition law. Not only should this enable large numbers of consumers and small businesses to obtain redress against anti-competitive behaviour, but an important by-product is that leftover damages could benefit access to justice more generally.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://legalvoice.org.uk/blog/collective-actions-and-access-to-justice/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=collective-actions-and-access-to-justice">Full story</a></p>
<p>Legal Voice, 1st March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legalvoice.org.uk">www.legalvoice.org.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/collective-actions-and-access-to-justice-legal-voice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libyan politician offers to settle UK lawsuit for £3 and an apology &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/libyan-politician-offers-to-settle-uk-lawsuit-for-3-and-an-apology-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/libyan-politician-offers-to-settle-uk-lawsuit-for-3-and-an-apology-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closed material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidnapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Libyan politician who is suing the former foreign secretary Jack Straw and the British government for damages after being kidnapped and taken to one of Gaddafi&#8217;s jails has offered to settle the case for just £3, providing he also receives an unreserved apology.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 4th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Libyan politician who is suing the former foreign secretary Jack Straw and the British government for damages after being kidnapped and taken to one of Gaddafi&#8217;s jails has offered to settle the case for just £3, providing he also receives an unreserved apology.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/04/libyan-politician-uk-lawsuit-apology">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 4th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/libyan-politician-offers-to-settle-uk-lawsuit-for-3-and-an-apology-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bar Council calls for changes as peers prepare to vote on new CFA and DBA rules &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bar-council-calls-for-changes-as-peers-prepare-to-vote-on-new-cfa-and-dba-rules-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bar-council-calls-for-changes-as-peers-prepare-to-vote-on-new-cfa-and-dba-rules-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[barristers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The government needs to deal with range of defects in the new rules for conditional fee agreements (CFAs) and damages-based agreements (DBAs), the Bar Council has urged ahead of a debate on them in the House of Lords tomorrow.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 25th February 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The government needs to deal with range of defects in the new rules for conditional fee agreements (CFAs) and damages-based agreements (DBAs), the Bar Council has urged ahead of a debate on them in the House of Lords tomorrow.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/bar-council-calls-changes-peers-prepare-vote-new-cfa-dba-rules">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 25th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bar-council-calls-for-changes-as-peers-prepare-to-vote-on-new-cfa-and-dba-rules-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hooper and another v Oates &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/hooper-and-another-v-oates-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/hooper-and-another-v-oates-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale of land]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hooper and another v Oates [2013] EWCA Civ 91; [2013] WLR (D) 72 &#8220;The date for assessment of damages for breach of a contract for the sale of land where the purchaser had failed or refused to complete the purchase was not the date of the breach but the date when the vendors brought to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-072">Hooper and another v Oates [2013] EWCA Civ 91; [2013] WLR (D) 72</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The date for assessment of damages for breach of a contract for the sale of land where the purchaser had failed or refused to complete the purchase was not the date of the breach but the date when the vendors brought to an end their reasonable attempts to resell the property and took the property back for their own use.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 20th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/hooper-and-another-v-oates-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill forcing papers to seek pre-publication approval is &#8216;flawed&#8217; &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bill-forcing-papers-to-seek-pre-publication-approval-is-flawed-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bill-forcing-papers-to-seek-pre-publication-approval-is-flawed-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Proposals for a new law which would require newspaper editors to seek regulatory approval for certain types of stories are flawed and should be abandoned, a number of peers have said.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Proposals for a new law which would require newspaper editors to seek regulatory approval for certain types of stories are flawed and should be abandoned, a number of peers have said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/22/bill-forcing-pre-publication-approval">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/bill-forcing-papers-to-seek-pre-publication-approval-is-flawed-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord McAlpine drops defamation claims against Twitter users with fewer than 500 followers &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/lord-mcalpine-drops-defamation-claims-against-twitter-users-with-fewer-than-500-followers-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/lord-mcalpine-drops-defamation-claims-against-twitter-users-with-fewer-than-500-followers-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Lord McAlpine has announced that he is dropping defamation claims against Twitter users with fewer than 500 followers who wrongly named him as a paedophile, instead asking for a charitable donation.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 21st February 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lord McAlpine has announced that he is dropping defamation claims against Twitter users with fewer than 500 followers who wrongly named him as a paedophile, instead asking for a charitable donation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/lord-mcalpine-drops-defamation-claims-against-twitter-users-with-fewer-than-500-followers-8504840.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 21st February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/lord-mcalpine-drops-defamation-claims-against-twitter-users-with-fewer-than-500-followers-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
