<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; courts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/courts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:56:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>High Court warns parties not to try their luck with stricter approach to compliance &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/high-court-warns-parties-not-to-try-their-luck-with-stricter-approach-to-compliance-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/high-court-warns-parties-not-to-try-their-luck-with-stricter-approach-to-compliance-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It would be &#8216;unfortunate&#8217; if the stricter post-Jackson approach to compliance with orders should encourage parties to refuse reasonable requests for time extensions in the hope that the court might refuse any extension at all, the High Court has said.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 14th June 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It would be &#8216;unfortunate&#8217; if the stricter post-Jackson approach to compliance with orders should encourage parties to refuse reasonable requests for time extensions in the hope that the court might refuse any extension at all, the High Court has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/high-court-warns-parties-try-luck-with-stricter-approach-compliance">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 14th June 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/high-court-warns-parties-not-to-try-their-luck-with-stricter-approach-to-compliance-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministry of Justice plans to cut court services trigger strikes &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/ministry-of-justice-plans-to-cut-court-services-trigger-strikes-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/ministry-of-justice-plans-to-cut-court-services-trigger-strikes-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Court staff are being called out on strike on Monday amid growing opposition to the Ministry of Justice&#8217;s proposals to contract out services, cut legal aid and limit the use of judicial review.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 13th June 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Court staff are being called out on strike on Monday amid growing opposition to the Ministry of Justice&#8217;s proposals to contract out services, cut legal aid and limit the use of judicial review.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jun/13/ministry-justice-proposals-court-staff-strikes">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 13th June 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/ministry-of-justice-plans-to-cut-court-services-trigger-strikes-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family courts risk &#8216;collapse&#8217; as surge in custody cases follows legal aid cuts &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/family-courts-risk-collapse-as-surge-in-custody-cases-follows-legal-aid-cuts-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/family-courts-risk-collapse-as-surge-in-custody-cases-follows-legal-aid-cuts-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigants in person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The family court system is in danger of &#8216;collapsing in on itself&#8217; after a surge in the number of warring parents turning up in person to launch child custody cases because of legal aid cuts, leading lawyers are warning.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 11th June 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The family court system is in danger of &#8216;collapsing in on itself&#8217; after a surge in the number of warring parents turning up in person to launch child custody cases because of legal aid cuts, leading lawyers are warning.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10111462/Family-courts-risk-collapse-as-surge-in-custody-cases-follows-legal-aid-cuts.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 11th June 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/family-courts-risk-collapse-as-surge-in-custody-cases-follows-legal-aid-cuts-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five centuries of crime and punishment leave the Old Bailey in need of repairs &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/five-centuries-of-crime-and-punishment-leave-the-old-bailey-in-need-of-repairs-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/five-centuries-of-crime-and-punishment-leave-the-old-bailey-in-need-of-repairs-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historic buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;For nearly 500 years the Old Bailey has been one of the world’s most famous criminal courts, hosting the trials of notorious killers like Dr Crippen, Ruth Ellis, Peter Sutcliffe and Ian Huntley.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 9th June 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For nearly 500 years the Old Bailey has been one of the world’s most famous criminal courts, hosting the trials of notorious killers like Dr Crippen, Ruth Ellis, Peter Sutcliffe and Ian Huntley.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10108639/Five-centuries-of-crime-and-punishment-leave-the-Old-Bailey-in-need-of-repairs.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 9th June 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/five-centuries-of-crime-and-punishment-leave-the-old-bailey-in-need-of-repairs-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Helen Fenwick: Article 8 ECHR, the ‘Feminist Article’, Women and a Conservative Bill of Rights &#8211; UK Constitutional Law Group</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/helen-fenwick-article-8-echr-the-feminist-article-women-and-a-conservative-bill-of-rights-uk-constitutional-law-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/helen-fenwick-article-8-echr-the-feminist-article-women-and-a-conservative-bill-of-rights-uk-constitutional-law-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;There has been a lot of commentary on the Report of the Bill of Rights’ Commission, and the ‘damp squib’ analysis of the Report (see Mark Elliott) as a whole is one most commentators appear to assent to (see eg Joshua Rozenberg for the Guardian here). My view in general is that the squib could [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There has been a lot of commentary on the Report of the Bill of Rights’ Commission, and the ‘damp squib’ analysis of the Report (see Mark Elliott) as a whole is one most commentators appear to assent to (see eg Joshua Rozenberg for the Guardian here). My view in general is that the squib could reignite post-2015 if a Conservative government is elected, not in relation to the very hesitant ideas as to the possible future content of a Bill of Rights that the Report put forward, but in relation to its majority recommendation that there should be one (see further my previous post on the Commission Report here). If a BoR was to emerge under a Conservative government post-2015 I suggest that it would reflect the ideas of the Conservative nominees on the Commission which assumed a far more concrete form in the Report than the majority recommendations did (eg see here at p 192). This blog post due to its length is not intended to examine the probable nature of such a BoR based on those ideas in general, but to focus only on two aspects: the idea of curtailing the effects of an equivalent to Article 8 ECHR (right to respect for private and family life), and of requiring domestic courts to disapply Strasbourg jurisprudence under a BoR in a wider range of situations than at present under s2HRA (see Roger Masterman’s post on s2 on this blog here). In respect of the latter issue the potential impact of so doing will only be linked to selected aspects of Article 8 jurisprudence of especial actual and potential benefit to women.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/06/05/helen-fenwick-article-8-echr-the-feminist-article-women-and-a-conservative-bill-of-rights/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Constitutional Law Group, 5th June 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukconstitutionallaw.org">www.ukconstitutionallaw.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/06/helen-fenwick-article-8-echr-the-feminist-article-women-and-a-conservative-bill-of-rights-uk-constitutional-law-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers warn privatisation of courts could damage City&#8217;s status as disputes centre &#8211; Legal Week</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lawyers-warn-privatisation-of-courts-could-damage-citys-status-as-disputes-centre-legal-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lawyers-warn-privatisation-of-courts-could-damage-citys-status-as-disputes-centre-legal-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 09:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;City lawyers have warned that London&#8217;s status as an international litigation centre will come under threat should the Government push ahead with proposals to privatise the courts service.&#8221; Full story Legal Week, 31st May 2013 Source: www.legalweek.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;City lawyers have warned that London&#8217;s status as an international litigation centre will come under threat should the Government push ahead with proposals to privatise the courts service.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/news/2271528/privatisation-of-courts-would-damage-londons-status-as-global-disputes-centre-warn-lawyers?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>Legal Week, 31st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legalweek.com">www.legalweek.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/lawyers-warn-privatisation-of-courts-could-damage-citys-status-as-disputes-centre-legal-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parties that fail to comply with court rules will be likely to face &#8216;severe sanctions&#8217;, says judge &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/parties-that-fail-to-comply-with-court-rules-will-be-likely-to-face-severe-sanctions-says-judge-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/parties-that-fail-to-comply-with-court-rules-will-be-likely-to-face-severe-sanctions-says-judge-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 08:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil procedure rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Courts are taking an increasingly tough stance on non-compliance with the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), an expert has said, following comments by a High Court judge that parties that do not comply with court rules and practice directions will be likely to face &#8216;severe sanctions&#8217;.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 31st May 2013 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Courts are taking an increasingly tough stance on non-compliance with the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), an expert has said, following comments by a High Court judge that parties that do not comply with court rules and practice directions will be likely to face &#8216;severe sanctions&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/may/parties-that-fail-to-comply-with-court-rules-will-be-likely-to-face-severe-sanctions-says-judge/?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 31st May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/parties-that-fail-to-comply-with-court-rules-will-be-likely-to-face-severe-sanctions-says-judge-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faster justice as unneccessary committal hearings are abolished &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/faster-justice-as-unneccessary-committal-hearings-are-abolished-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/faster-justice-as-unneccessary-committal-hearings-are-abolished-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[committals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=84001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Serious criminals will face justice as soon as possible with the abolition of committal hearings Justice Minister Damian Green said today.&#8221; Full story Ministry of Justice, 28th May 2013 Source: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Serious criminals will face justice as soon as possible with the abolition of committal hearings Justice Minister Damian Green said today.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/faster-justice-as-unneccessary-committal-hearings-are-abolished">Full story</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 28th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice">www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/faster-justice-as-unneccessary-committal-hearings-are-abolished-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts may be privatised to save Ministry of Justice £1bn &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/courts-may-be-privatised-to-save-ministry-of-justice-1bn-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/courts-may-be-privatised-to-save-ministry-of-justice-1bn-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 10:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The courts may be privatised in a justice shake-up that could save the Ministry of Justice £1 billion a year.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 28th May 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The courts may be privatised in a justice shake-up that could save the Ministry of Justice £1 billion a year.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10083214/Courts-may-be-privatised-to-save-Ministry-of-Justice-1bn.html?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 28th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/courts-may-be-privatised-to-save-ministry-of-justice-1bn-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaws in fraud case show worrying lapses by judges and lawyers &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/flaws-in-fraud-case-show-worrying-lapses-by-judges-and-lawyers-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/flaws-in-fraud-case-show-worrying-lapses-by-judges-and-lawyers-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Anthony White admitted fraud over mortgages, but analysis seems to show problems that senior judges failed to spot.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anthony White admitted fraud over mortgages, but analysis seems to show problems that senior judges failed to spot.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/23/fraud-case-lapses-judges-lawyers?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/flaws-in-fraud-case-show-worrying-lapses-by-judges-and-lawyers-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court bares post-Jackson teeth with stricter approach to relief from sanctions &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-with-stricter-approach-to-relief-from-sanctions-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-with-stricter-approach-to-relief-from-sanctions-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil procedure rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The High Court has sent the first sign of a hardened stance against missed deadlines since the new Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) came into force.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 23rd May 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The High Court has sent the first sign of a hardened stance against missed deadlines since the new Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) came into force.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-stricter-approach-relief-sanctions?utm_source=feedly">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 23rd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-bares-post-jackson-teeth-with-stricter-approach-to-relief-from-sanctions-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to justice at risk with court fee plans, warns CJC &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/access-to-justice-at-risk-with-court-fee-plans-warns-cjc-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/access-to-justice-at-risk-with-court-fee-plans-warns-cjc-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigants in person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Government plans to reform the regime for court fees remissions and introduce a means test are too severe and &#8216;will diminish access to justice for a sizeable group of low-income families&#8217;, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has warned.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 22nd May 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government plans to reform the regime for court fees remissions and introduce a means test are too severe and &#8216;will diminish access to justice for a sizeable group of low-income families&#8217;, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has warned.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/access-justice-risk-court-fee-plans-warns-cjc">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 22nd May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/access-to-justice-at-risk-with-court-fee-plans-warns-cjc-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traffic courts in every area &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/traffic-courts-in-every-area-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/traffic-courts-in-every-area-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road traffic offences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Local areas are being urged to work with the judiciary to set up the courts as part of proposals to reduce delays and focus more on serious and contested cases. This forms part of the Government’s vision for a more efficient and effective criminal justice system that meet the needs of victims, witnesses and communities.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Local areas are being urged to work with the judiciary to set up the courts as part of proposals to reduce delays and focus more on serious and contested cases. This forms part of the Government’s vision for a more efficient and effective criminal justice system that meet the needs of victims, witnesses and communities.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/traffic-courts-in-every-area">Full story</a> </p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice">www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/traffic-courts-in-every-area-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special traffic courts to deal with motoring cases under ministers&#8217; plans &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/special-traffic-courts-to-deal-with-motoring-cases-under-ministers-plans-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/special-traffic-courts-to-deal-with-motoring-cases-under-ministers-plans-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road traffic offences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Traffic-light jumpers and speeding motorists are to be dealt with in special traffic courts in a bid to free up time for more serious cases, the government has announced.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 17th May 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Traffic-light jumpers and speeding motorists are to be dealt with in special traffic courts in a bid to free up time for more serious cases, the government has announced.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/may/17/special-traffic-courts-for-motoring-cases">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 17th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/special-traffic-courts-to-deal-with-motoring-cases-under-ministers-plans-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court Litigation Commercial Bargains and The Common Law &#8211; 11 KBW</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-litigation-commercial-bargains-and-the-common-law-11-kbw-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-litigation-commercial-bargains-and-the-common-law-11-kbw-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[company law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Employment litigation in the High Court is one of the most interesting and dynamic areas of practice. The cases tend to be fought at the point where countervailing currents commercial and employment law meet and many of the cases turn on resolving the tension between a bargain struck between commercial men and the portmanteau term [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Employment litigation in the High Court is one of the most interesting and dynamic areas of practice.   The cases tend to be fought at the point where countervailing currents commercial  and employment law meet and many of the cases turn on resolving the tension between a bargain struck between commercial men and the portmanteau term of trust and confidence.  That tension presents an opportunity for the creative advisor and a pitfall for the unwary&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.11kbw.com/app/files/Articles/ELApaper11Mar13_do_.pdf">Full story</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>11 KBW, 10th May 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.11kbw.com">www.11kbw.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/05/high-court-litigation-commercial-bargains-and-the-common-law-11-kbw-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crime and Courts Act 2013 &#8211; legislation.gov.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/crime-and-courts-act-2013-legislation-gov-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/crime-and-courts-act-2013-legislation-gov-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deferred prosecution agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national crime agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceeds of crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Full text of Act Source: www.legislation.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/22/contents/enacted">Full text of Act</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk">www.legislation.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/crime-and-courts-act-2013-legislation-gov-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSBC Bank plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/hsbc-bank-plc-v-tambrook-jersey-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/hsbc-bank-plc-v-tambrook-jersey-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[administrators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign jurisdictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HSBC Bank plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWHC 866 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 146 &#8220;The English court could not “assist” a foreign insolvency court for the purposes of section 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 where there were no existing insolvency proceedings in the foreign jurisdiction or any intention to commence such proceedings.&#8221; WLR [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2013-146">HSBC Bank plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWHC 866 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 146</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The English court could not “assist” a foreign insolvency court for the purposes of section 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 where there were no existing insolvency proceedings in the foreign jurisdiction or any intention to commence such proceedings.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 12th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/hsbc-bank-plc-v-tambrook-jersey-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government will be mightily relieved at decision to uphold political ads ban &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/government-will-be-mightily-relieved-at-decision-to-uphold-political-ads-ban-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/government-will-be-mightily-relieved-at-decision-to-uphold-political-ads-ban-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The court&#8217;s decision turned on the judges&#8217; assessment of what restrictions are necessary in a democratic society.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 22nd April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The court&#8217;s decision turned on the judges&#8217; assessment of what restrictions are necessary in a democratic society.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/apr/22/government-relieved-decision-political-ad">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 22nd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/government-will-be-mightily-relieved-at-decision-to-uphold-political-ads-ban-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simplified court fee waivers to save taxpayers £7m &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/simplified-court-fee-waivers-to-save-taxpayers-7m-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/simplified-court-fee-waivers-to-save-taxpayers-7m-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A consultation published today sets out proposals for fee remissions (waivers) for courts and tribunals which are better targeted, fairer for the taxpayer and easy for users to understand.&#8221; Full press release Ministry of Justice, 18th April 2013 Source: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A consultation published today sets out proposals for fee remissions (waivers) for courts and tribunals which are better targeted, fairer for the taxpayer and easy for users to understand.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-court-fee-waivers-to-save-taxpayers-7m">Full press release</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 18th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice">www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/simplified-court-fee-waivers-to-save-taxpayers-7m-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Justice Modernisation Programme &#8211; Judiciary of England and Wales</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/family-justice-modernisation-programme-judiciary-of-england-and-wales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/family-justice-modernisation-programme-judiciary-of-england-and-wales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The President of the Family Division has issued this update on the process of reform.&#8221; Full press release Judiciary of England and Wales, 15th April 2013 Sorce: www.judiciary.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The President of the Family Division has issued this update on the process of reform.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications-and-reports/reports/family/the-family-justice-modernisation-programme/family-justice-modernisation-programme">Full press release</a></p>
<p>Judiciary of England and Wales, 15th April 2013</p>
<p>Sorce: <a href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk">www.judiciary.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/family-justice-modernisation-programme-judiciary-of-england-and-wales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fee remissions for the courts and tribunals &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/fee-remissions-for-the-courts-and-tribunals-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/fee-remissions-for-the-courts-and-tribunals-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=83087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This consultation paper sets our proposals for reform of the fee remissions system, which ensures that access to justice is maintained for those individuals on lower incomes who would otherwise have difficultly paying a fee to use court or tribunal services.&#8221; Full story Ministry of Justice, 18th April 2013 Source: www.justice.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This consultation paper sets our proposals for reform of the fee remissions system, which ensures that access to justice is maintained for those individuals on lower incomes who would otherwise have difficultly paying a fee to use court or tribunal services.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/fee-remissions-court-tribunals/consult_view">Full story</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 18th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk">www.justice.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/fee-remissions-for-the-courts-and-tribunals-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharia courts putting women at risk, CPS warns &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/sharia-courts-putting-women-at-risk-cps-warns-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/sharia-courts-putting-women-at-risk-cps-warns-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islamic law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Sharia courts are putting women at risk of violence from abusive husbands, the Crown Prosecution Service has warned.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 7th April 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sharia courts are putting women at risk of violence from abusive husbands, the Crown Prosecution Service has warned.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9976822/Sharia-courts-putting-women-at-risk-CPS-warns.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 7th April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/sharia-courts-putting-women-at-risk-cps-warns-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cautions for serious and repeat offenders under review &#8211; Ministry of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/cautions-for-serious-and-repeat-offenders-under-review-ministry-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/cautions-for-serious-and-repeat-offenders-under-review-ministry-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cautions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recidivists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Serious and repeat criminals should not expect to escape with a caution, Secretary of State for Justice Chris Grayling announced today with the launch of a Government review into cautions. &#8221; Full story Ministry of Justice, 3rd April 2013 Source: www.justice.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Serious and repeat criminals should not expect to escape with a caution, Secretary of State for Justice Chris Grayling announced today with the launch of a Government review into cautions. &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/press-releases/moj/cautions-for-serious-and-repeat-offenders-under-review">Full story</a></p>
<p>Ministry of Justice, 3rd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.justice.gov.uk">www.justice.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/cautions-for-serious-and-repeat-offenders-under-review-ministry-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police cautions to be reviewed by government &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/police-cautions-to-be-reviewed-by-government-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/police-cautions-to-be-reviewed-by-government-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cautions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recidivists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The government is launching a review of the use of police cautions in England and Wales, amid fears that they are being used to punish serious offences that should be dealt with by the courts.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 3rd April 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The government is launching a review of the use of police cautions in England and Wales, amid fears that they are being used to punish serious offences that should be dealt with by the courts.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/apr/03/police-cautions-reviewed">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 3rd April 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/04/police-cautions-to-be-reviewed-by-government-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regina v Applied Language Solutions Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/regina-v-applied-language-solutions-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/regina-v-applied-language-solutions-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpreters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maladministration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina v Applied Language Solutions Ltd: [2013] EWCA Crim 326;   [2013] WLR (D)  123 &#8220;Where a company had an agreement with the Ministry of Justice to provide interpreters, including interpreters for criminal proceedings, it was essential that an interpreter was provided on every occasion when one was required. If there was successive non-attendance of an [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2013-123">Regina v Applied Language Solutions Ltd: [2013] EWCA Crim 326;   [2013] WLR (D)  123</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Where a company had an agreement with the Ministry of Justice to provide interpreters, including interpreters for criminal proceedings, it was essential that an interpreter was provided on every occasion when one was required. If there was successive non-attendance of an individual interpreter or successive failures in systems a court was entitled to view that as amounting to serious misconduct rendering the company liable for the costs thereby incurred by the Crown Prosecution Service and the defence.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 25th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/regina-v-applied-language-solutions-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign lawsuits may face higher UK legal fees &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/foreign-lawsuits-may-face-higher-uk-legal-fees-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/foreign-lawsuits-may-face-higher-uk-legal-fees-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Higher fees may be introduced for foreign businessmen and Russian oligarchs who pursue their multimillion-pound disputes in British courts, under a review announced on Tuesday.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 26th March 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Higher fees may be introduced for foreign businessmen and Russian oligarchs who pursue their multimillion-pound disputes in British courts, under a review announced on Tuesday.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/mar/26/foreign-lawsuits-uk-legal-fees">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 26th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/foreign-lawsuits-may-face-higher-uk-legal-fees-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QB Master warns of “blood on the floor” after 1 April &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/qb-master-warns-of-blood-on-the-floor-after-1-april-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/qb-master-warns-of-blood-on-the-floor-after-1-april-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Jackson reforms will leave &#8216;blood on the floor&#8217; and a lack of resources behind the reforms will leave courts and judges &#8216;overwhelmed&#8217; by the extra workload, Master Cook of the Queen’s Bench Division has predicted.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 5th March 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Jackson reforms will leave &#8216;blood on the floor&#8217; and a lack of resources behind the reforms will leave courts and judges &#8216;overwhelmed&#8217; by the extra workload, Master Cook of the Queen’s Bench Division has predicted.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/qb-master-warns-blood-floor-1-april">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 5th March 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/03/qb-master-warns-of-blood-on-the-floor-after-1-april-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attack of the Clones: Supreme Court keeps its white male first eleven &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/attack-of-the-clones-supreme-court-keeps-its-white-male-first-eleven-uk-human-rights-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/attack-of-the-clones-supreme-court-keeps-its-white-male-first-eleven-uk-human-rights-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Baroness Helena Kennedy has argued that judges have a tendency to clone themselves when choosing successors. It is hard to avoid that impression in the Supreme Court, which kept its white male first eleven in place yesterday by appointing three new justices: Lord Justice Hughes, Lord Justice Toulson and Lord Hodge. The sole woman amongst [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Baroness Helena Kennedy has argued that judges have a tendency to clone themselves when choosing successors. It is hard to avoid that impression in the Supreme Court, which kept its white male first eleven in place yesterday by appointing three new justices: Lord Justice Hughes, Lord Justice Toulson and Lord Hodge. The sole woman amongst 12 justices of our highest appeal court remains Lady Hale. There are no black or Asian judges, not have there ever been.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/02/27/attack-of-the-clones-supreme-court-keeps-its-white-male-first-eleven/">Full story</a></p>
<p>UK Human Rights Blog, 27th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ukhumanrightsblog.com">www.ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/attack-of-the-clones-supreme-court-keeps-its-white-male-first-eleven-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial appointments: new boys at the supreme court &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/judicial-appointments-new-boys-at-the-supreme-court-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/judicial-appointments-new-boys-at-the-supreme-court-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Who&#8217;s in and who&#8217;s out of the top tier of the judiciary? Joshua Rozenberg&#8217;s money is on Lady Hale for deputy president.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 27th February 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who&#8217;s in and who&#8217;s out of the top tier of the judiciary? Joshua Rozenberg&#8217;s money is on Lady Hale for deputy president.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/feb/27/judicial-appointments-new-boys-supreme-court">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 27th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/judicial-appointments-new-boys-at-the-supreme-court-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson implementation lectures restart with patents court success story &#8211; Litigation Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/jackson-implementation-lectures-restart-with-patents-court-success-story-litigation-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/jackson-implementation-lectures-restart-with-patents-court-success-story-litigation-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=82091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Reforms to the Patents County Court (PCC) – including a costs cap – have been a “considerable success” and enabled more people to bring cases, the first Jackson implementation lecture in nearly nine months has revealed.&#8221; Full story Litigation Futures, 26th February 2013 Source: www.litigationfutures.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reforms to the Patents County Court (PCC) – including a costs cap – have been a “considerable success” and enabled more people to bring cases, the first Jackson implementation lecture in nearly nine months has revealed.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com/news/jackson-implementation-lectures-restart-patents-court-success-story">Full story</a></p>
<p>Litigation Futures, 26th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.litigationfutures.com">www.litigationfutures.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/jackson-implementation-lectures-restart-with-patents-court-success-story-litigation-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intellectual Property Litigation: Implementation of the Jackson Report&#8217;s Recommendations &#8211; Speech by Mr Justice Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/intellectual-property-litigation-implementation-of-the-jackson-reports-recommendations-speech-by-mr-justice-arnold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/intellectual-property-litigation-implementation-of-the-jackson-reports-recommendations-speech-by-mr-justice-arnold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Litigation: Implementation of the Jackson Report&#8217;s Recommendations (PDF) Speech by Mr Justice Arnold AIPPI UK, 14th February 2013 Source: www.judiciary.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/justice-arnold-speech-implementation-programme-lecture-17.pdf">Intellectual Property Litigation: Implementation of the Jackson Report&#8217;s Recommendations</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>Speech by Mr Justice Arnold</p>
<p>AIPPI UK, 14th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: www.judiciary.gov.uk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/intellectual-property-litigation-implementation-of-the-jackson-reports-recommendations-speech-by-mr-justice-arnold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious courts and Sharia divorce &#8211; Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/religious-courts-and-sharia-divorce-halsburys-law-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/religious-courts-and-sharia-divorce-halsburys-law-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial provision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residence orders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;If you glanced at the front page of The Times for 1 February, with its headline &#8216;High Court opens way to Sharia divorces&#8217;, you could have been forgiven for thinking that the court had made some important pronouncement on the role of Sharia (Islamic law) in divorce proceedings. The story’s first paragraph would also have [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you glanced at the front page of The Times for 1 February, with its headline &#8216;High Court opens way to Sharia divorces&#8217;, you could have been forgiven for thinking that the court had made some important pronouncement on the role of Sharia (Islamic law) in divorce proceedings. The story’s first paragraph would also have led you naturally to that conclusion. &#8216;The prospect of divorce cases being settled by Sharia and religious courts&#8217;, it says, &#8216;has been opened up by landmark legal decision.&#8217; So it would have come as a bit of a jolt to read the start of the next paragraph: &#8216;A Jewish couple have had their divorce settlement under Beth Din, rabbinical law, approved by the High Court.&#8217; As this indicates, the case (AI v MT [2013] EWHC 100 (Fam)) says nothing whatsoever about Sharia.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/religious-courts-and-sharia-divorce/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange, 4th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/">www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/religious-courts-and-sharia-divorce-halsburys-law-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice minister, Chris Grayling, accused of legal interference &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/justice-minister-chris-grayling-accused-of-legal-interference-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/justice-minister-chris-grayling-accused-of-legal-interference-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imprisonment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor, was at the centre of a major legal row last night amid accusations that he politically interfered with a judicial decision taken by his own department.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 3rd February 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor, was at the centre of a major legal row last night amid accusations that he politically interfered with a judicial decision taken by his own department.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/justice-minister-chris-grayling-accused-of-legal-interference-8478605.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 3rd February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/justice-minister-chris-grayling-accused-of-legal-interference-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV cameras to be allowed into court of appeal &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/tv-cameras-to-be-allowed-into-court-of-appeal-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/tv-cameras-to-be-allowed-into-court-of-appeal-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;TV cameras will be allowed into the court of appeal for the first time from October and senior judges will be offered training before appearing on camera, the lord chief justice has revealed.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 30th January 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;TV cameras will be allowed into the court of appeal for the first time from October and senior judges will be offered training before appearing on camera, the lord chief justice has revealed.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jan/30/tv-cameras-appeal-court-warning">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 30th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/tv-cameras-to-be-allowed-into-court-of-appeal-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord Judge ‘troubled’ by court camera plan &#8211; Law Society&#8217;s Gazette</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/lord-judge-troubled-by-court-camera-plan-law-societys-gazette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/lord-judge-troubled-by-court-camera-plan-law-societys-gazette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video recordings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The lord chief justice has voiced opposition to the government’s plan to allow the filming of sentencing in the Crown court.&#8221; Full story Law Society&#8217;s Gazette, 30th January 2013 Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The lord chief justice has voiced opposition to the government’s plan to allow the filming of sentencing in the Crown court.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/lord-judge-troubled-court-camera-plan">Full story</a></p>
<p>Law Society&#8217;s Gazette, 30th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk">www.lawgazette.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/lord-judge-troubled-by-court-camera-plan-law-societys-gazette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tomorrow&#8217;s Lawyers: a virtual judiciary &#8211; extract &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/tomorrows-lawyers-a-virtual-judiciary-extract-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/tomorrows-lawyers-a-virtual-judiciary-extract-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Is court a service or a place? And what is the scope for the &#8216;decomposing and multi-sourcing&#8217; of judicial work?&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 29th January 2013 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is court a service or a place? And what is the scope for the &#8216;decomposing and multi-sourcing&#8217; of judicial work?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jan/29/tomorrows-lawyers-virtual-judiciary-richard-susskind">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 29th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/tomorrows-lawyers-a-virtual-judiciary-extract-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zakrzewski (Respondent) v The Regional Court in Lodz, Poland (Appellant) &#8211; Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/zakrzewski-respondent-v-the-regional-court-in-lodz-poland-appellant-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/zakrzewski-respondent-v-the-regional-court-in-lodz-poland-appellant-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign jurisdictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zakrzewski (Respondent) v The Regional Court in Lodz, Poland (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 2 &#124; UKSC 2012/0072 (YouTube) Supreme Court, 23rd January 2013 Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eikgurovYXE">Zakrzewski (Respondent) v The Regional Court in Lodz, Poland (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 2 | UKSC 2012/0072</a> (YouTube)</p>
<p>Supreme Court, 23rd January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt">www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/zakrzewski-respondent-v-the-regional-court-in-lodz-poland-appellant-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Almost £2 billion in court fines and confiscation orders remain unpaid &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/almost-2-billion-in-court-fines-and-confiscation-orders-remain-unpaid-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/almost-2-billion-in-court-fines-and-confiscation-orders-remain-unpaid-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[assets recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Nearly £2 billion in court fines and confiscation orders remain unpaid, official figures show, as the Government admitted it needed to do more to tackle the debt.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 19th January 2013 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nearly £2 billion in court fines and confiscation orders remain unpaid, official figures show, as the Government admitted it needed to do more to tackle the debt.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9812660/Almost-2-billion-in-court-fines-and-confiscation-orders-remain-unpaid.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 19th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/almost-2-billion-in-court-fines-and-confiscation-orders-remain-unpaid-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off with his head: Recent developments in severability &#8211; Hardwicke Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/off-with-his-head-recent-developments-in-severability-hardwicke-chambers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/off-with-his-head-recent-developments-in-severability-hardwicke-chambers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Adjudicators are increasingly called upon to adjudicate upon complex, multi-faceted disputes. It is now well established that &#8216;a dispute&#8217; can encompass several discrete issues and the TCC has striven to avoid an overly legalistic approach and to apply common sense when deciding whether a claim encompasses &#8216;a dispute&#8217; or not.&#8221; Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 7th [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Adjudicators are increasingly called upon to adjudicate upon complex, multi-faceted disputes. It is now well established that &#8216;a dispute&#8217; can encompass several discrete issues and the TCC has striven to avoid an overly legalistic approach and to apply common sense when deciding whether a claim encompasses &#8216;a dispute&#8217; or not.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hardwicke.co.uk/insights/articles/off-with-his-head-recent-developments-in-severability">Full story</a></p>
<p>Hardwicke Chambers, 7th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.hardwicke.co.uk">www.hardwicke.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/off-with-his-head-recent-developments-in-severability-hardwicke-chambers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What has the European Court of Human Rights ever done for us? &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/what-has-the-european-court-of-human-rights-ever-done-for-us-the-independent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/what-has-the-european-court-of-human-rights-ever-done-for-us-the-independent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Court of Human Rights has a bad press in Britain – but for thousands of desperate people it is their last shot at justice.&#8221; Full story The Independent, 14th January 2013 Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Court of Human Rights has a bad press in Britain – but for thousands of desperate people it is their last shot at justice.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/what-has-the-european-court-of-human-rights-ever-done-for-us-8451406.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Independent, 14th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/what-has-the-european-court-of-human-rights-ever-done-for-us-the-independent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal challenge to put an end to court papers &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/legal-challenge-to-put-an-end-to-court-papers-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/legal-challenge-to-put-an-end-to-court-papers-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Saying you’re going to end the legal world’s reliance on paper sounds almost as audacious a claim as announcing you’re going to stop banks paying bonuses. Graham Smith, however, believes his small London-based business is set to revolutionise the way trials and other hearings are managed all over the world by doing exactly that.&#8221; Full [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Saying you’re going to end the legal world’s reliance on paper sounds almost as audacious a claim as announcing you’re going to stop banks paying bonuses. Graham Smith, however, believes his small London-based business is set to revolutionise the way trials and other hearings are managed all over the world by doing exactly that.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businessclub/9786257/Legal-challenge-to-put-an-end-to-court-papers.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 8th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/legal-challenge-to-put-an-end-to-court-papers-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court custody suites criticised by prisons watchdog &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/court-custody-suites-criticised-by-prisons-watchdog-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/court-custody-suites-criticised-by-prisons-watchdog-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Women and children awaiting trial are being kept too close to men in court custody suites, a watchdog has found.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 8th January 2013 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Women and children awaiting trial are being kept too close to men in court custody suites, a watchdog has found.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20942007">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 8th January 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/01/court-custody-suites-criticised-by-prisons-watchdog-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More trials being disrupted over interpreter failings &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/more-trials-being-disrupted-over-interpreter-failings-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/more-trials-being-disrupted-over-interpreter-failings-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpreters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Nearly 200 trials were disrupted or postponed in England and Wales in the first quarter of the year because interpreters provided by a private firm failed to appear, according to a damning report by the select committee.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 14th December 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nearly 200 trials were disrupted or postponed in England and Wales in the first quarter of the year because interpreters provided by a private firm failed to appear, according to a damning report by the select committee.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/dec/14/trials-disrupted-interpreter-failings">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 14th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/more-trials-being-disrupted-over-interpreter-failings-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court of Appeal: Criminal Appeals Heard More Quickly &#8211; Judiciary of England and Wales</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/court-of-appeal-criminal-appeals-heard-more-quickly-judiciary-of-england-and-wales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/court-of-appeal-criminal-appeals-heard-more-quickly-judiciary-of-england-and-wales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) heard appeals against conviction and sentence more quickly last year than in previous years according to the Court’s annual report published today (Tuesday 11 December).&#8221; Full story Judiciary of England and Wales, 11th December 2012 Source: www.judiciary.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) heard appeals against conviction and sentence more quickly last year than in previous years according to the Court’s annual report published today (Tuesday 11 December).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/media-releases/2012/coa-news-release-crim-appeals-heard-more-quickly-11122012">Full story</a></p>
<p>Judiciary of England and Wales, 11th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.judiciary.gov.uk">www.judiciary.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/court-of-appeal-criminal-appeals-heard-more-quickly-judiciary-of-england-and-wales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unmeritorious appeals ‘clogging the arteries’ of CoA &#8211; Law Society&#8217;s Gazette</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/unmeritorious-appeals-clogging-the-arteries-of-coa-law-societys-gazette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/unmeritorious-appeals-clogging-the-arteries-of-coa-law-societys-gazette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Increasing numbers of ‘unmeritorious’ appeals could have the effect of ‘clogging the arteries’ of the court of appeal, the registrar of criminal appeals has warned.&#8221; Full story Law Society&#8217;s Gazette, 11th December 2012 Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Increasing numbers of ‘unmeritorious’ appeals could have the effect of ‘clogging the arteries’ of the court of appeal, the registrar of criminal appeals has warned.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/unmeritorious-appeals-clogging-arteries-coa">Full story</a></p>
<p>Law Society&#8217;s Gazette, 11th December 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk">www.lawgazette.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/12/unmeritorious-appeals-clogging-the-arteries-of-coa-law-societys-gazette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Votes for prisoners &#8211; opening the door? &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/votes-for-prisoners-opening-the-door-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/votes-for-prisoners-opening-the-door-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Polls suggest the public are incredulous at the idea. And, famously, we all know that it makes David Cameron physically sick.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 19th November 2012 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Polls suggest the public are incredulous at the idea. And, famously, we all know that it makes David Cameron physically sick.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20397871">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 19th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/votes-for-prisoners-opening-the-door-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equal pay claims: should equal pay claims be brought in an ordinary court? &#8211; Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/equal-pay-claims-should-equal-pay-claims-be-brought-in-an-ordinary-court-halsburys-law-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/equal-pay-claims-should-equal-pay-claims-be-brought-in-an-ordinary-court-halsburys-law-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;As Harvey points out in Division K, there have been inconsistent decisions over the last year on whether equal pay claims can be brought in an ordinary court, the obvious point being that in a tribunal a claimant must claim within six months of leaving the employment whereas in a court action the limitation period [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As <em>Harvey</em> points out in Division K, there have been inconsistent decisions over the last year on whether equal pay claims can be brought in an ordinary court, the obvious point being that in a tribunal a claimant must claim within six months of leaving the employment whereas in a court action the limitation period would be six years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/equal-pay-claims-should-equal-pay-claims-be-brought-in-an-ordinary-court/">Full story</a></p>
<p>Halsbury&#8217;s Law Exchange, 19th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk">www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/equal-pay-claims-should-equal-pay-claims-be-brought-in-an-ordinary-court-halsburys-law-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More criminals to escape courts under new police commissioners, magistrates warn &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/more-criminals-to-escape-courts-under-new-police-commissioners-magistrates-warn-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/more-criminals-to-escape-courts-under-new-police-commissioners-magistrates-warn-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cautions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magistrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;More offenders will be &#8216;let off&#8217; with cautions and fines following the introduction of police and crime commissioners, magistrates fear.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 19th November 2012 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;More offenders will be &#8216;let off&#8217; with cautions and fines following the introduction of police and crime commissioners, magistrates fear.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9686235/More-criminals-to-escape-courts-under-new-police-commissioners-magistrates-warn.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 19th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/more-criminals-to-escape-courts-under-new-police-commissioners-magistrates-warn-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial dialogue? Straw and Bratza deliver choice words on Strasbourg &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/judicial-dialogue-straw-and-bratza-deliver-choice-words-on-strasbourg-the-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/judicial-dialogue-straw-and-bratza-deliver-choice-words-on-strasbourg-the-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lectures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lord chancellor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Former lord chancellor suggests the human rights court will be the architect of its own demise as the former president recalls its achievements.&#8221; Full story The Guardian, 14th November 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Former lord chancellor suggests the human rights court will be the architect of its own demise as the former president recalls its achievements.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/nov/14/straw-bratza-strasbourg">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Guardian, 14th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/judicial-dialogue-straw-and-bratza-deliver-choice-words-on-strasbourg-the-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil courts could get powers to enforce compensation for wronged consumers &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/civil-courts-could-get-powers-to-enforce-compensation-for-wronged-consumers-out-law-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/civil-courts-could-get-powers-to-enforce-compensation-for-wronged-consumers-out-law-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=80112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;New powers that could make it easier for consumers to demand reimbursement from companies who have overcharged or mis-sold them products have been proposed by the Government.&#8221; Full story OUT-LAW.com, 7th November 2012 Source: www.out-law.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;New powers that could make it easier for consumers to demand reimbursement from companies who have overcharged or mis-sold them products have been proposed by the Government.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/november/civil-courts-could-get-powers-to-enforce-compensation-for-wronged-consumers/">Full story</a></p>
<p>OUT-LAW.com, 7th November 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.out-law.com">www.out-law.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/11/civil-courts-could-get-powers-to-enforce-compensation-for-wronged-consumers-out-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
