Hot-tubbing report sparks rule committee decision to take wider look at expert evidence – Litigation Futures

Posted November 30th, 2016 in civil procedure rules, evidence, expert witnesses, news, reports by tracey

‘The Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CRPC) is to look into the provision of expert evidence in court as it considers the recommendations of a recent report into concurrent evidence, known as hot-tubbing.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 28th November 2016

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on Hot-tubbing report sparks rule committee decision to take wider look at expert evidence – Litigation Futures

Breathing space for PI lawyers? Reforms unlikely to have impact until 2018 – Legal Futures

Posted November 21st, 2016 in civil procedure rules, news, personal injuries, small claims by sally

‘The government has indicated that its plans for personal injury reform will not become law for well over a year.’

Full story

Legal Futures, 21st November 2016

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Comments Off on Breathing space for PI lawyers? Reforms unlikely to have impact until 2018 – Legal Futures

CA upholds refusal to grant relief to solicitors who served witness statements late – Litigation Futures

Posted November 15th, 2016 in appeals, civil procedure rules, law firms, news, sanctions, solicitors, time limits, witnesses by tracey

‘Solicitors who served witness statements two months late cannot call any witnesses at trial after the Court of Appeal upheld the first instance judge’s decision to refuse relief from sanctions.’

Full story

Litigation futures, 14th November 2016

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on CA upholds refusal to grant relief to solicitors who served witness statements late – Litigation Futures

CA ruling on fixed fees to have ‘substantial’ effect – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted November 14th, 2016 in civil procedure rules, costs, damages, fees, insurance, news, personal injuries by tracey

‘The Court of Appeal delivered some good news to claimants last week with a ruling on the level of fees that apply to cases listed for disposal, in a decision that Lord Justice Briggs said would have a “substantial” cumulative effect.’

Full story

Law Society’s Gazette, 14th November 2016

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Comments Off on CA ruling on fixed fees to have ‘substantial’ effect – Law Society’s Gazette

Cardiff v Lee: Permission needed to enforce a suspended possession order – Hardwicke Chambers

‘Last week, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Cardiff County Council v Lee (Flowers) [2016] EWCA Civ 1034, confirming that all landlords, whether social or private, are required to seek the permission of the County Court under CPR r83.2 in order to obtain a warrant of possession for breach of a suspended possession order.’

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 26th November 2016

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

Comments Off on Cardiff v Lee: Permission needed to enforce a suspended possession order – Hardwicke Chambers

Caution: Slippery Claimant – Park Square Barristers

Posted November 9th, 2016 in appeals, civil procedure rules, costs, news, personal injuries by sally

‘Holly Clegg considers: If a Judge finds the Claimant’s evidence to be incredible, should the Defendant necessarily seek a finding of fundamental dishonesty? Not unless such a finding is clearly sustainable on the evidence, according to the case of Meadows v La Tasca Restaurants Limited.’

Full story

Park Square Barristers, 7th November 2016

Source: www.parksquarebarristers.co.uk

Comments Off on Caution: Slippery Claimant – Park Square Barristers

Litigants in Person, Costs Budgeting and McKenzie Friends: A Practical View from the Bar – Littleton Chambers

Posted November 9th, 2016 in budgets, civil procedure rules, costs, McKenzie friends, news by sally

‘In his monthly column, James Bickford Smith discusses two important decisions concerning respectively the applicability of costs budgeting rules to litigants in person and the court’s approach to attempts to control a litigant’s choice of McKenzie friends.’

Full story

Littleton Chambers, 7th November 2016

Source: www.littletonchambers.com

Comments Off on Litigants in Person, Costs Budgeting and McKenzie Friends: A Practical View from the Bar – Littleton Chambers

Exemplary Damages in the Tort of Deceit – Park Square Barristers

Posted November 9th, 2016 in civil procedure rules, costs, damages, deceit, fraud, insurance, news by sally

‘On the 1st November 2016 at Manchester County Court Toby Coupe, instructed by Toby Evans (Partner, Keoghs LLP) and Richard Harvey (Senior Claims Handler, Zurich Insurance PLC) to act on behalf of Zurich Insurance PLC (‘Zurich’), obtained an order that the Claimants and the Second Defendant do pay Zurich £5,000 in exemplary damages and £16,844.04 in indemnity costs, such costs to be enforceable to the full extent of the Order pursuant to CPR 44.16 (1), on the basis that the claims had been found to be fundamentally dishonest.’

Full story

Park Square Barristers, 2nd November 2016

Source: www.parksquarebarristers.co.uk

Comments Off on Exemplary Damages in the Tort of Deceit – Park Square Barristers

Thum v Thum – WLR Daily

Posted November 8th, 2016 in civil procedure rules, delay, divorce, EC law, law reports, regulations, service by sally

Thum v Thum [2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam)

‘Having issued a divorce petition in the English courts on 26 October 2015 the wife made no attempt to serve the husband until, on 19 January 2016, she sent the papers to the relevant court office for service out of the jurisdiction. A typographical error contained within the details of the husband’s address caused effective service to be further delayed until 27 February 2016. The husband, having issued his own German divorce petition on 19 January 2016, applied to dismiss or stay the wife’s petition on the ground that she had failed “subsequently [to] take the steps required of her to effect service upon the respondent” in accordance with article 16 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (“Brussels II revised”).’

WLR Daily, 21st October 2016

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Thum v Thum – WLR Daily

Court “does not have to accept” parties’ agreement not to budget – Litigation Futures

Posted November 8th, 2016 in appeals, budgets, civil procedure rules, competition, costs, news, tribunals by sally

‘A High Court judge has made it clear that the court is not required to go along with parties who agree to dispense with costs management.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 7th November 2016

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on Court “does not have to accept” parties’ agreement not to budget – Litigation Futures

Cost benefit analysis – New Law Journal

Posted October 31st, 2016 in civil procedure rules, costs, news, wasted costs orders by sally

‘Costs orders: who pays & when, asks Kerry Underwood.’

Full story

New Law Journal, 20th October 2016

Source: www.newlawjournal.co.uk

Comments Off on Cost benefit analysis – New Law Journal

Kazakhstan Kagazy plc and others v Zhunus and others – WLR Daily

Posted October 31st, 2016 in civil procedure rules, contribution, fraud, freezing injunctions, law reports by sally

Kazakhstan Kagazy plc and others v Zhunus and others [2016] EWCA Civ 1036

‘The claimants were a group of companies. The first and second defendants had been, respectively, the chairman of the board and the chief executive officer of the first and second claimants. The third defendant had been the finance director of the second claimant. The claimants issued proceedings alleging, inter alia, that the defendants had dishonestly caused the claimant companies to enter into transactions in which large sums of money were paid to entities owned or controlled by the defendants and which had caused the claimants to incur substantial financial losses. All three defendants served defences denying fraud and dishonesty or that they had personally benefitted from the transactions. Subsequently, the first defendant reached a settlement of the claim against him with the claimants. The second and third defendants applied for permission pursuant to CPR r 20.6(2)(b) to bring a contribution claim against the first defendant, no such claim having been filed and served when they served their defence. The second defendant further sought a worldwide freezing order against the first defendant. The judge refused the applications, holding that (i) the claim for contribution was bound to fail because the draft contribution notice sought to be relied upon by the second and third defendants did not advance a case of actual fraud or wrongdoing by the first defendant and, following the their settlement agreement with the first defendant, no such case was being advanced by the claimants which the second and third defendants could adopt as an alternative to their primary position that they had acted honestly; and (ii) the court could only grant a freezing injunction once the applicant had an accrued cause of action, which, in the context of a claim for contribution, was once the contribution notice had been filed and served under CPR r 20.6(2).’

WLR Daily, 26th October 2016

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Kazakhstan Kagazy plc and others v Zhunus and others – WLR Daily

Departing Jackson – New Law Journal

Posted October 31st, 2016 in budgets, case management, civil procedure rules, costs, news by sally

‘Francis Kendall reports on a positive result for costs budgeting.’

Full story

New Law Journal, 18th October 2016

Source: www.newlawjournal.co.uk

Comments Off on Departing Jackson – New Law Journal

High Court rejects security for costs application in face of £5m ATE policy – Litigation Futures

Posted October 25th, 2016 in civil procedure rules, costs, insurance, news by michael

‘The High Court has accepted after-the-event (ATE) insurance cover of £5m as sufficient to dismiss an application for security for costs.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 24th October 2016

Source: www. litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on High Court rejects security for costs application in face of £5m ATE policy – Litigation Futures

High Court bids to minimise delay in bitter costs dispute between solicitors – Litigation Futures

Posted October 25th, 2016 in civil procedure rules, costs, delay, law firms, news, solicitors by michael

‘A High Court master has rejected an application from a Leicestershire solicitor for trial of a preliminary issue in a costs claim involving another law firm, citing the “high degree of personal animosity between the parties”.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 18th October 2016

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on High Court bids to minimise delay in bitter costs dispute between solicitors – Litigation Futures

Compliance with the pre-action protocol for construction and engineering disputes – Out-Law.com

Posted October 24th, 2016 in building law, civil procedure rules, news by michael

‘A specific pre-action protocol applies to construction and engineering disputes. These claims are typically heard by the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) division of the High Court.’

Full guide

Out-Law.com, 21st October 2016

Source: www.out-law.com

Comments Off on Compliance with the pre-action protocol for construction and engineering disputes – Out-Law.com

Budgeting v Assessment– Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust – Zenith PI Blog

Posted October 21st, 2016 in budgets, civil procedure rules, costs, news by sally

‘The court, with District Judge Lumb sitting as Regional Costs Judge, was asked to decide as a preliminary issue, “to what extent, if at all, does the costs budgeting regime under CPR Part 3 fetter the powers and discretion of the costs judge at a detailed assessment of costs under CPR part 47.”’

Full story

Zenith PI Blog, 19th October 2016

Source: www.zenithpi.wordpress.com

Comments Off on Budgeting v Assessment– Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust – Zenith PI Blog

Budgeting “does not fetter” costs judge on detailed assessment – Litigation Futures

Posted October 18th, 2016 in budgets, civil procedure rules, costs, judges, news by sally

‘The budgeting regime does not fetter the powers and discretion of the judge at detailed assessment even if the receiving party comes in within the budgeted figures, a regional costs judge has ruled.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 14th October 2016

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on Budgeting “does not fetter” costs judge on detailed assessment – Litigation Futures

Jackson: call for multi-track fixed costs is not an admission of costs management’s failure – Litigation Futures

Posted October 14th, 2016 in case management, civil procedure rules, costs, news by sally

‘Lord Justice Jackson said today that his call to extend fixed recoverable costs to the lower reaches of the multi-track is not an admission that costs management has not worked.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 13th October 2016

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on Jackson: call for multi-track fixed costs is not an admission of costs management’s failure – Litigation Futures

New bill of costs set to become compulsory from October 2017 – Litigation Futures

Posted October 10th, 2016 in civil procedure rules, costs, news by sally

‘The new format bill of costs is set to become compulsory in a year’s time after the rule committee decoupled it from mandatory use of the J-Codes, it has emerged.’

Full story

Litigation Futures, 6th October 2016

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Comments Off on New bill of costs set to become compulsory from October 2017 – Litigation Futures