<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness &#187; building law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/category/building-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>from the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Making rights to light more transparent &#8211; Law Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/making-rights-to-light-more-transparent-law-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/making-rights-to-light-more-transparent-law-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to light]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=81955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In a consultation opening today the Law Commission is asking for views on the current law on rights to light, including their creation, enforcement and extinguishment.&#8221; Full story Law Commission, 18th February 2013 Source: www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a consultation opening today the Law Commission is asking for views on the current law on rights to light, including their creation, enforcement and extinguishment.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/news/rights-to-light-news.htm">Full story</a></p>
<p>Law Commission, 18th February 2013</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk">www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2013/02/making-rights-to-light-more-transparent-law-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meg Burgess wall death: Builder George Collier jailed &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/meg-burgess-wall-death-builder-george-collier-jailed-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/meg-burgess-wall-death-builder-george-collier-jailed-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[causing death of children or vulnerable adults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health & safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=79436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A builder has been given a two year jail term after a three-year-old girl died when she was crushed by a collapsing wall.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 5th October 2012 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A builder has been given a two year jail term after a three-year-old girl died when she was crushed by a collapsing wall.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-19841005#">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 5th October 2012</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2012/10/meg-burgess-wall-death-builder-george-collier-jailed-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jenson and another v Faux &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/jenson-and-another-v-faux-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/jenson-and-another-v-faux-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defective premises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory duty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=50678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenson and another v Faux [2011] EWCA Civ 423;  [2011] WLR (D)  133 &#8220;A contractor who carried out works to a dwelling owed a duty under section 1 of the Defective Premises Act 1972 to see that the work was done in a workmanlike or professional manner. That duty was owed to the person for whom the works were [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR Dailies/WLRD 2011/wlrd2011-133">Jenson and another v Faux [2011] EWCA Civ 423;  [2011] WLR (D)  133</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A contractor who carried out works to a dwelling owed a duty under section 1 of the Defective Premises Act 1972 to see that the work was done in a workmanlike or professional manner. That duty was owed to the person for whom the works were carried out and the purchaser to whom that property was subsequently sold where the dwelling was new, or if refurbished or extended, it was wholly different from the old dwelling. The Act did not apply to improvements which did not sufficiently change the character of the property so as to amount to a new dwelling.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 13th April 2011</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.iclr.co.uk/">www.iclr.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2011/04/jenson-and-another-v-faux-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People in rural villages to be allowed to build on green belt without planning permission &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/07/people-in-rural-villages-to-be-allowed-to-build-on-green-belt-without-planning-permission-daily-telegraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/07/people-in-rural-villages-to-be-allowed-to-build-on-green-belt-without-planning-permission-daily-telegraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=37273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;People living in rural communities will be able to give themselves the right to build on local green belt land without planning permission, under plans to be unveiled today.&#8221; Full story Daily Telegraph, 23rd July 2010 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People living in rural communities will be able to give themselves the right to build on local green belt land without planning permission, under plans to be unveiled today.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/7905033/People-in-rural-villages-to-be-allowed-to-build-on-green-belt-without-planning-permission.html">Full story</a></p>
<p>Daily Telegraph, 23rd July 2010</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">www.telegraph.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2010/07/people-in-rural-villages-to-be-allowed-to-build-on-green-belt-without-planning-permission-daily-telegraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bath Spa: Council paid £4m compensation for delay – BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/12/bath-spa-council-paid-4m-compensation-for-delay-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/12/bath-spa-council-paid-4m-compensation-for-delay-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/bath-spa-council-paid-4m-compensation-for-delay-bbc-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Bath and North East Somerset Council was paid at least £4.17m in compensation for the delayed Bath Spa Project, its accounts have revealed.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 9th December 2009 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bath and North East Somerset Council was paid at least £4.17m in compensation for the delayed Bath Spa Project, its accounts have revealed.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/somerset/8404244.stm">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 9th December 2009</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/12/bath-spa-council-paid-4m-compensation-for-delay-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory for anti-scald campaign – BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/06/victory-for-anti-scald-campaign-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/06/victory-for-anti-scald-campaign-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health & safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal injuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=22098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A campaign to reduce injuries caused by scalding in the bath has brought about a change to building regulations.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 11th June 2009 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A campaign to reduce injuries caused by scalding in the bath has brought about a change to building regulations.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/8096636.stm">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 11th June 2009</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2009/06/victory-for-anti-scald-campaign-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council to sue £21m over Bath Spa &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/12/council-to-sue-21m-over-bath-spa-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/12/council-to-sue-21m-over-bath-spa-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=15553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Bath and North East Somerset Council is to sue a building firm for £21m after a luxury spa opened five years late.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 15th December 2008 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bath and North East Somerset Council is to sue a building firm for £21m after a luxury spa opened five years late.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/7782410.stm">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 15th December 2008</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/12/council-to-sue-21m-over-bath-spa-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge slams Wembley dispute’s £22m costs total &#8211; The Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/10/judge-slams-wembley-dispute%e2%80%99s-22m-costs-total-the-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/10/judge-slams-wembley-dispute%e2%80%99s-22m-costs-total-the-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=11567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A judge has hit out at the participants involved in a four-year dispute over the construction of Wembley Stadium after they racked up £22m in costs, including £1m on photocopying.&#8221; Full story The Lawyer, 6th October 2008 Source: www.thelawyer.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A judge has hit out at the participants involved in a four-year dispute over the construction of Wembley Stadium after they racked up £22m in costs, including £1m on photocopying.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelawyer.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=135014">Full story</a></p>
<p>The Lawyer, 6th October 2008</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thelawyer.com">www.thelawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/10/judge-slams-wembley-dispute%e2%80%99s-22m-costs-total-the-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law change call for bust builders &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/05/law-change-call-for-bust-builders-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/05/law-change-call-for-bust-builders-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/?p=5600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Laws need to be tightened to ensure homeowners are not out of pocket when builders go bankrupt, the housing minister for Wales has said.&#8221; Full story BBC News, 19th May 2008 Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Laws need to be tightened to ensure homeowners are not out of pocket when builders go bankrupt, the housing minister for Wales has said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/7407351.stm">Full story</a></p>
<p>BBC News, 19th May 2008</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/05/law-change-call-for-bust-builders-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reinwood Ltd v L Brown &amp; Sons Ltd &#8211; WLR Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/03/reinwood-ltd-v-l-brown-sons-ltd-wlr-daily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/03/reinwood-ltd-v-l-brown-sons-ltd-wlr-daily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/reinwood-ltd-v-l-brown-sons-ltd-wlr-daily/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reinwood Ltd v L Brown &#38; Sons Ltd [2008] UKHL 12; WLR (D) 77 &#8220;Where under the JCT Standard Form of Building Contract, 1998 ed, Private with Quantities the architect granted the contractor an extension of time after the employer had served a withholding notice and paid under an interim certificate on the assumption that [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2008/HLPC/mar0.1.htm">Reinwood Ltd v L Brown &amp; Sons Ltd [2008] UKHL 12; WLR (D) 77</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Where under the JCT Standard Form of Building Contract, 1998 ed, Private with Quantities the architect granted the contractor an extension of time after the employer had served a withholding notice and paid under an interim certificate on the assumption that it had the right to rely on a non-completion certificate previously served, the grant of the extension of time did not deprive the employer of that right since it did not cancel the non-completion notice restrospectively.&#8221;</p>
<p>WLR Daily, 10th March 2008</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk">www.lawreports.co.uk</a></p>
<p><i>Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.<br />
</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2008/03/reinwood-ltd-v-l-brown-sons-ltd-wlr-daily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melville Dundas Ltd and Others v George Wimpey UK Ltd and Others &#8211; Times Law Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/05/melville-dundas-ltd-and-others-v-george-wimpey-uk-ltd-and-others-times-law-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/05/melville-dundas-ltd-and-others-v-george-wimpey-uk-ltd-and-others-times-law-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 09:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[building law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/2007/05/08/melville-dundas-ltd-and-others-v-george-wimpey-uk-ltd-and-others-times-law-reports/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Receivership prevents notice of intention from being given Melville Dundas Ltd. and Others v. George Wimpey UK Ltd. and Others House of Lords &#8220;A provision that a party to a construction contract could not, unless he had given notice of intention to do so, withhold payment after the final date for payment of a sum [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Receivership prevents notice of intention from being given</p>
<p><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article1759965.ece">Melville Dundas Ltd. and Others v. George Wimpey UK Ltd. and Others</a></p>
<p>House of Lords</p>
<p>&#8220;A provision that a party to a construction contract could not, unless he had given notice of intention to do so, withhold payment after the final date for payment of a sum due under the contract, did not apply to a lawful ground for withholding payment, such as the contractor going into receivership, when it was not possible for notice to have been given within the statutory time frame.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Times, 8th May 2007</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/">www.timesonline.co.uk</a></p>
<p><em>Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2007/05/melville-dundas-ltd-and-others-v-george-wimpey-uk-ltd-and-others-times-law-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
